OpenText Application Quality Management vs Zephyr Enterprise
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found OpenText Application Quality Management easier to use. However, Zephyr Enterprise is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Zephyr Enterprise overall.
Reviewers felt that Zephyr Enterprise meets the needs of their business better than OpenText Application Quality Management.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Zephyr Enterprise is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Zephyr Enterprise over OpenText Application Quality Management.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing available
Zephyr Enterprise
No pricing available
Free Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information available
Zephyr Enterprise
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.3
69
Ease of Use
7.9
118
7.8
71
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
8.4
39
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
8.6
38
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.2
55
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.