Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare McGraw-Hill Connect and WebAssign 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Speakable
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Synap
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Go1
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (37.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
McGraw-Hill Connect
Star Rating
(176)3.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about McGraw-Hill ConnectWebAssign
Star Rating
(24)3.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about WebAssignSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that McGraw-Hill Connect excels in providing a variety of question types, scoring a high 9.0 in question variety, which enhances the assessment experience compared to WebAssign, which does not have a specific score for this feature.
- Reviewers mention that McGraw-Hill Connect's progress reporting is particularly strong, with a score of 8.9, allowing educators to track student performance effectively, while WebAssign's reporting features are rated lower at 7.1, indicating less robust analytics capabilities.
- G2 users highlight that McGraw-Hill Connect offers better pre-made content, scoring 8.5, which is beneficial for instructors looking for ready-to-use materials, whereas WebAssign's pre-made content is rated lower at 8.3, suggesting it may not be as comprehensive.
- Users on G2 indicate that McGraw-Hill Connect provides a more favorable quality of support, with a score of 7.3, compared to WebAssign's lower score of 6.3, which may affect user satisfaction and assistance during implementation.
- Reviewers say that McGraw-Hill Connect's automated grading feature is rated at 7.9, making it a reliable choice for educators seeking efficiency, while WebAssign's gamification aspect is rated lower at 5.7, indicating it may not engage students as effectively.
- Users report that McGraw-Hill Connect's adaptive learning capabilities score 7.6, allowing for personalized learning paths, while WebAssign's offerings in this area are less emphasized, potentially limiting customization for diverse learning needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
McGraw-Hill Connect
No pricing availableWebAssign
No pricing availableFree Trial
McGraw-Hill Connect
No trial information availableWebAssign
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
7.9
142
8.2
18
Ease of Use
7.3
142
7.4
19
Ease of Setup
7.5
25
7.3
5
Ease of Admin
7.5
24
7.7
5
Quality of Support
7.3
130
6.3
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
24
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
140
4.5
19
Features by Category
Assessment delivery
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
Grading and reporting
7.9
7
Not enough data
5.7
5
Not enough data
6.7
7
Not enough data
7.1
7
Not enough data
Administration
6.3
5
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
Learning Content
8.5
13
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
7.3
13
Not enough data
6.5
11
Not enough data
Personalization
7.1
11
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
8.2
14
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics
7.4
11
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Learning Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting Analysis
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
Course Management
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Integration
6.9
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
Customer Assistance
6.7
6
Not enough data
Platform Customization
6.7
6
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Online Learning Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Features
8.5
10
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
8.1
19
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
8.2
18
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
McGraw-Hill Connect and WebAssign are categorized as Online Learning Platform
Unique Categories
McGraw-Hill Connect is categorized as Digital Learning Platforms, Study Tools, Assessment, and Classroom Management
WebAssign has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
McGraw-Hill Connect
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
WebAssign
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Higher Education
38.3%
Education Management
24.6%
E-Learning
12.0%
Primary/Secondary Education
6.6%
Accounting
3.0%
Other
15.6%
Higher Education
33.3%
Education Management
33.3%
E-Learning
12.5%
Telecommunications
4.2%
Human Resources
4.2%
Other
12.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
How easy it is for students to get access at home?
3 Comments
JV
It isn't always consistent and even if they can access it they'll wish they never had because this is an awful program.Read more
WebAssign has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
