When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found SUSE Rancher easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Kubernetes overall.
Reviewers felt that Kubernetes meets the needs of their business better than SUSE Rancher.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Kubernetes is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Kubernetes over SUSE Rancher.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Kubernetes
No pricing available
SUSE Rancher
No pricing available
Free Trial
Kubernetes
No trial information available
SUSE Rancher
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
127
8.5
92
Ease of Use
7.9
135
8.7
102
Ease of Setup
7.4
89
8.3
72
Ease of Admin
8.0
71
8.7
62
Quality of Support
8.5
109
8.1
83
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
- Container orchestration utilising available hardware or VMs, thus decreasing costs
- High Availability within a data center / availability zone
- Ability...Read more
What does Kubernetes do?
1 Comment
MG
Container orchestration and container management.
You can also configure properties on the basis of which scaling of pods will be done.
It makes your...Read more
Rancher creates and manages Kubernetes clusters. It has the most complete GUI to interact with Kubernetes clusters without diving deep in "kubectl" and YAMLs.Read more
How is Rancher different from Kubernetes?
1 Comment
EV
You don't compare these products. Rancher creates and manages Kubernetes clusters like VMWare ESXi creates and manages virtual machines.Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.