Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Kubernetes and SUSE Rancher 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Komodor
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (39.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (42.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Kubernetes
Star Rating
(145)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (39.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about KubernetesSUSE Rancher
Star Rating
(118)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SUSE RancherSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Kubernetes excels in scalability with a score of 9.2, allowing organizations to efficiently manage large-scale containerized applications, while Rancher, with a score of 8.8, is noted for its ease of use in smaller environments.
- Reviewers mention that Kubernetes offers superior orchestration capabilities, scoring 9.6, which is crucial for automating deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications, whereas Rancher, scoring 8.8, provides a more user-friendly interface that simplifies these processes for less complex setups.
- G2 users highlight Kubernetes' robust performance and stability with a score of 9.0, making it a preferred choice for mission-critical applications, while Rancher, with a score of 8.5, is appreciated for its ease of setup, making it ideal for teams looking to quickly deploy container management solutions.
- Users on G2 report that Kubernetes has a more comprehensive developer toolkit, scoring 8.6, which is beneficial for teams needing advanced features, while Rancher, with a score of 7.8, is seen as more accessible for developers who prioritize simplicity over extensive functionality.
- Reviewers mention that Kubernetes provides better access control features, scoring 9.1, which is essential for organizations with strict security requirements, while Rancher, scoring 8.5, offers adequate access control but may not meet the needs of highly regulated environments.
- Users say that Kubernetes shines in its architecture with a score of 9.0, allowing for flexible deployment options, while Rancher, with a score of 8.4, is recognized for its straightforward management of multi-cluster environments, making it easier for teams to oversee multiple Kubernetes clusters.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Kubernetes
No pricing availableSUSE Rancher
No pricing availableFree Trial
Kubernetes
No trial information availableSUSE Rancher
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.2
120
8.6
89
Ease of Use
7.9
128
8.8
99
Ease of Setup
7.3
82
8.4
69
Ease of Admin
8.0
70
8.7
60
Quality of Support
8.4
102
8.2
80
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
56
8.6
54
Product Direction (% positive)
9.7
116
9.6
89
Features by Category
Edge
Not enough data
8.8
15
Not enough data
9.2
15
Not enough data
8.7
15
Not enough data
8.8
15
Operations
Not enough data
9.3
15
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
9.5
16
Not enough data
9.1
15
Performance
Not enough data
9.5
16
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.2
15
Management
8.8
64
8.5
77
Feature Not Available
8.4
74
Feature Not Available
8.1
72
Organization
9.1
61
8.5
75
9.0
65
8.8
74
9.6
66
8.7
75
Development
8.7
52
7.8
72
9.1
65
8.5
74
9.0
52
8.2
72
9.1
55
8.7
74
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Kubernetes and SUSE Rancher are categorized as Container Management
Unique Categories
Kubernetes is categorized as Container Orchestration
SUSE Rancher is categorized as IoT Edge Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Kubernetes
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SUSE Rancher
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
32.6%
Information Technology and Services
20.6%
Telecommunications
9.9%
Financial Services
5.0%
Internet
3.5%
Other
28.4%
Information Technology and Services
25.7%
Computer Software
9.7%
Telecommunications
5.3%
Financial Services
5.3%
Banking
4.4%
Other
49.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
What are the main features of Kubernetes?
1 Comment
![Yiorgos [George] A.](/assets/transparent-ad5be28fbcd25b7b08d2cebe1d957125437fb5407d75ee717965ad22c8808791.gif "Yiorgos [George] A.")
YA
- Container orchestration utilising available hardware or VMs, thus decreasing costs
- High Availability within a data center / availability zone
- Ability...Read more
What does Kubernetes do?
1 Comment
MG
Container orchestration and container management.
You can also configure properties on the basis of which scaling of pods will be done.
It makes your...Read more
Kubernetes has no more discussions with answers
What are features of Rancher?
1 Comment
EV
Rancher creates and manages Kubernetes clusters. It has the most complete GUI to interact with Kubernetes clusters without diving deep in "kubectl" and YAMLs.Read more
How is Rancher different from Kubernetes?
1 Comment
EV
You don't compare these products. Rancher creates and manages Kubernetes clusters like VMWare ESXi creates and manages virtual machines.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
