Red Hat OpenShift Reviews & Product Details

I really appreciate Red Hat OpenShift for its strong security features. It delivers security by default through restricted security policies and non-root containers, which reduce risk without requiring extra setup. The RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) model is clear and practical, making it easy to control who can deploy, manage, or access resources and clearly separate admin, DevOps, and developer responsibilities. We use OpenShift on a daily basis for running and managing production workloads, and features like automated scaling, rolling updates, health checks, and image scanning help us meet enterprise security and compliance needs. While the initial setup requires Kubernetes knowledge, the guided installation, good documentation, and Red Hat support make implementation manageable. Integration with existing tools like CI/CD, monitoring, and identity providers is straightforward, and Red Hat’s customer support is responsive and reliable when issues arise. Overall, it feels like a secure, well-governed platform that still keeps things simple for our team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One drawback of Red Hat OpenShift is that it can feel heavy and complex compared to plain Kubernetes, especially for smaller teams or simple workloads. The learning curve is steeper due to OpenShift-specific concepts like Routes and Operators. Also, upgrades require careful planning. The initial setup of Red Hat OpenShift was moderately complex, and while the installation process is well-documented, it still requires solid Kubernetes and infrastructure knowledge. For experienced teams, it's manageable, but for a smaller team, it feels heavy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like Red Hat OpenShift because we use it for deploying and managing our applications in containers, making scaling easy for us. The consistent experience across cloud, on-prem, and hybrid environments is really valuable, as code works the same in all environments right through to production. The transition to OpenShift solved our issues with code standardization across different machines. Its inbuilt DevOps features like pipelines and workflows are an added advantage. We chose OpenShift over Amazon EKS and Google Kubernetes Engine due to its hybrid nature and common functionality checks across environments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't like the high cost of Red Hat OpenShift compared to other alternatives in the market. The initial transition phase is complex and takes a lot of time to set up, which can be overwhelming. Also, it's heavy on processing, requiring more resources than we initially had. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love that Red Hat OpenShift is built on Kubernetes, which significantly enhances my ability to streamline developer workflows. This integration allows me to leverage Kubernetes' powerful orchestration tools, providing a robust infrastructure for deploying and managing containerized applications at scale. Additionally, I appreciate the granular control it offers, enabling me to fine-tune deployments according to specific needs across hybrid cloud environments. This level of control is crucial in optimizing resource allocation and ensuring efficient application management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Red Hat OpenShift to be a bit costly, which can be a significant consideration when managing budgets. Additionally, even though there are numerous configuration options available, the platform tends to feel quite opinionated, which can lead to a steep learning curve for users trying to fully leverage its capabilities. Moreover, the initial setup process is somewhat complex, which can be daunting when first getting started with the software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate Red Hat OpenShift for its ability to streamline developer workflows in application development and modernization. Its unified enterprise-grade Kubernetes platform simplifies complexity, automates manual tasks, and ensures consistency across deployments. I love its consistent and automated environment which allows developers to build and deploy applications effortlessly across various platforms. The initial setup is highly automated, requiring minimal user input beyond configuration, which the cloud provider and Red Hat manage effectively. This automation simplifies the process significantly, allowing for a quick and efficient deployment through the Red Hat Hybrid Cloud Console. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Red Hat OpenShift to be quite complex, particularly when managing configurations for security settings, networking, and storage across multiple clusters and environments. This complexity can make the initial setup challenging and often requires a significant investment in training and support. Additionally, the cost associated with using Red Hat OpenShift is a concern, given the resource demands it imposes. Furthermore, there are certain integration issues which can complicate its use with other tools or systems, affecting the overall seamlessness we aim for in our workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate Red Hat OpenShift for its seamless support in hosting our Maximo application suite, notably through its capabilities in easy containerization and simplified deployment processes with pipelines. The platform stands out for its ease of installation and maintenance, which significantly reduces the complexity typically associated with such tasks. Moreover, I find the options like auto-scaler of nodes and descheduler extremely valuable, especially as the auto-scaler adeptly adjusts the number of nodes based on utilization, ensuring optimal load management and consistent performance. This automation is crucial in maintaining a reliable performance without manual intervention. The initial setup was straightforward, facilitated by using playbooks, which helped streamline the process efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find that the monitoring features in Red Hat OpenShift could be improved. Specifically, there is a lack of inbuilt viewing dashboards that I believe would enhance the usability and effectiveness of the monitoring capabilities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate the fantastic dashboard offered by Red Hat OpenShift. Its intuitive design places all necessary functions in one location, creating an unparalleled user interface that simplifies orchestration tasks significantly. No other orchestration solution provides such a comprehensive and user-friendly console, making Red Hat OpenShift stand out in terms of usability and accessibility for managing deployments effectively. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Red Hat OpenShift to be a bit costly, and it requires a lot of resources to start the deployment process. Additionally, the initial setup took some time to understand and get started with. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I appreciate most about OpenShift is that it serves as an advanced, out-of-the-box solution for monitoring our Kubernetes cluster. The range of options available for managing and viewing information is extensive, and the interface is very straightforward to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One aspect I dislike about Openshift is that it does not offer straightforward support for ingress. Instead, it uses what it calls "routers," which are essentially just HA Proxy processes. I am not sure about SSO integration of Openshift, but it should be available. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like how OpenShift bundles everything into one clean, integrated platform. It cuts the usual Kubernetes chaos and gives teams a smoother, more reliable path from code to production. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ChatGPT said:

OpenShift can feel heavy and overly strict. It demands more resources than you’d expect, and its opinionated setup sometimes slows you down when you just want to get work done. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The sky is the limit with OCP. When i first started with containerization I was very lost until i started working in Open shift. I went from knowing nothing to being a Open shift administrator within a few months. Now we manage over 20 clusters worldwide and continue to grow! There are so many great resources available to learn and can be applied to both kuberenetes and Open shift as they are very similar. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Steep learning curve, it tools months to get proficient but once you understand the technology it just works. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If you don't have the time, skills, or desire to set up your own kubernetes/ hypervisor infrastructure ( on top of your actual product) OpenShift can provide a mostly lock in free solution for you. You do have to drink the Kool-Aid, but you don't have time to make your own Kool-Aid, so shut up and enjoy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Part of being bespoke is they have made decisions that help more tightly bind you to other products in their ecosystem. Of course there is an cost and myriad of Licensing complexity to extract the most revenue from you. That is the trade you make for not having to do a whole bunch of work yourself.

You will still need to be able to debug and understand all the components when things go wrong, or invest in other layers of support for that. This is just the toolset. This is like "Snap On", and your still the mechanic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.