Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare KDevelop and Qt 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Opti Digital
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
1oT
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
KDevelop
Star Rating
(10)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about KDevelopQt
Star Rating
(53)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about QtSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that KDevelop excels in its "Ease of Use" with a score of 9.0, making it a preferred choice for developers who prioritize a user-friendly interface, while Qt, with a score of 8.4, is noted for being slightly more complex to navigate.
- Reviewers mention that KDevelop's "File Management" feature, scoring 7.7, is straightforward, but Qt shines with its "Multi-Language Support" at 8.3, allowing developers to work seamlessly across different programming languages.
- G2 users highlight that KDevelop offers solid "Customization" options with a score of 8.0, enabling tailored development environments, whereas Qt's "Straight-Out-the-Box Functionality" at 8.7 is praised for its immediate usability without extensive setup.
- Users on G2 report that KDevelop's "Help Guides" are comprehensive, scoring 8.3, which aids in onboarding new users, while Qt's support is also rated well at 8.3, but some users feel that the documentation could be more detailed.
- Reviewers say that KDevelop's "Patching & Updates" feature, with a score of 7.7, is reliable, but Qt's performance in "Integrations" is highlighted as a strong point, allowing for better connectivity with other tools and platforms.
- Users report that KDevelop's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.0, which is slightly lower than Qt's 8.3, indicating that while both products offer good support, Qt may have a slight edge in responsiveness and assistance.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
KDevelop
No pricing availableQt
No pricing availableFree Trial
KDevelop
No trial information availableQt
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
8
8.5
45
Ease of Use
9.0
8
8.4
45
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.5
13
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.3
11
Quality of Support
8.0
5
8.3
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
7.8
10
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
8
8.2
45
Features by Category
Python Integrated Development Environments (IDE)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Design
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Control
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Platform - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Advertising - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Mobile Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
KDevelop and Qt are categorized as Python Integrated Development Environments (IDE) and C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE)
Unique Categories
KDevelop has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
KDevelop
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Qt
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
30.0%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Renewables & Environment
10.0%
Medical Devices
10.0%
Marketing and Advertising
10.0%
Other
20.0%
Computer Software
28.8%
Information Technology and Services
7.7%
Telecommunications
5.8%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
5.8%
Higher Education
5.8%
Other
46.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
KDevelop has no discussions with answers
What are the primary benefits of QtCreator?
1 Comment
LR
QtCreator has many benefits:
+ It is stable mature software being continuously developed and maintained following best practices since 1995.
+ It has...Read more
What is the use of Qt Creator?
1 Comment
SP
It’s a multi-platform Développement IDE available for windows, Linux, macOS, android and others.Read more
Is Qt Creator IDE free?
1 Comment
SP
QT Creator is the development IDE, you can use the IDE however the QT libraries are only free for open source development which means if you use the open...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
