Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GNU Octave and Posit 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ILUM
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
High Digital
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Starburst
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (48.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GNU Octave
Star Rating
(55)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GNU OctavePosit
Star Rating
(562)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PositSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Posit excels in data visualization capabilities, with a score of 8.9, particularly highlighting its intuitive graphs and charts, while GNU Octave, although competent, received a lower score of 8.0 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Posit offers superior model training features, scoring 9.1, which users appreciate for its efficiency and effectiveness in developing machine learning models, whereas GNU Octave's model training scored 8.9, indicating it may not be as robust in this aspect.
- G2 users note that Posit has a more user-friendly reports interface, scoring 8.2, which simplifies the process of generating and customizing reports, while GNU Octave lacks in this area, leading to a less streamlined experience.
- Users on G2 highlight that Posit provides better support for data governance, scoring 9.0, which is crucial for organizations needing to manage data compliance effectively, compared to GNU Octave's score of 8.2.
- Reviewers say that Posit shines in its ease of setup with a score of 8.7, making it more accessible for new users, while GNU Octave does not have a comparable score, indicating potential challenges in initial configuration.
- Users report that Posit's collaboration features, with a score of 8.1, facilitate teamwork effectively, whereas GNU Octave's collaboration tools scored slightly lower at 8.0, suggesting a less integrated experience for teams working together.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GNU Octave
No pricing availablePosit
No pricing availableFree Trial
GNU Octave
No trial information availablePosit
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
43
9.1
496
Ease of Use
8.4
43
8.3
496
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.8
106
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.3
90
Quality of Support
8.2
39
8.1
403
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.5
81
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
41
8.5
488
Features by Category
Administration
8.4
17
8.7
76
8.2
20
9.2
82
8.0
18
8.2
76
Capabilities
8.9
20
9.0
89
8.0
18
8.9
67
8.1
17
8.9
55
8.5
16
8.8
59
Methodology
8.8
13
9.1
77
8.3
19
9.5
85
8.3
16
9.3
82
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
9.5
10
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
Tools
8.5
11
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
Work
9.0
10
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
Environment
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
System
Not enough data
9.1
25
Model Development
Not enough data
8.8
19
Not enough data
7.8
21
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
9.0
21
Model Development
Not enough data
9.0
20
Machine/Deep Learning Services
Not enough data
8.6
15
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
7.6
17
Machine/Deep Learning Services
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
9.1
18
Deployment
Not enough data
8.4
19
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
8.7
19
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Integrations
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
6
Platform
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.3
6
Processing
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.1
8
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GNU Octave and Posit are categorized as Statistical Analysis
Unique Categories
GNU Octave is categorized as Simulation & CAE
Posit is categorized as Big Data Processing and Distribution and Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GNU Octave
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Posit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Research
11.3%
Computer Software
11.3%
Information Technology and Services
5.7%
Higher Education
5.7%
Food Production
5.7%
Other
60.4%
Higher Education
19.1%
Information Technology and Services
12.6%
Research
11.2%
Computer Software
8.7%
Education Management
5.6%
Other
42.8%
Discussions
GNU Octave has no discussions with answers
Can we save our process if we don't save a project?
2 Comments
SL
There are many ways to save results as an R script runs, take a look at the R saveRDS function as one example.
For questions like this about R a great...Read more
What is the best way to run R code within a VBA routine?
1 Comment
PB
I ran into same kind of problems. Then I discovered PowerBI.
With PowerBI, and the help of PowerQuery, I'm getting rid of all VbA engines to process...Read more
Which software is used for R programming?
1 Comment
SH
RStudio is the most popular IDE for running R programs and has a free license. The official R software environment is an open-source free software...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
