Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitHub and Plastic SCM 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (64.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
$9.95 user/month
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,263)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansPlastic SCM
Star Rating
(36)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (64.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$9.95 user/month
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Ease of Use with a score of 8.7, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a straightforward interface. In contrast, Plastic SCM, while functional, has a lower score of 7.9, which some users find less intuitive.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Integration capabilities are robust, scoring 9.1, allowing seamless connections with various tools and services. Plastic SCM, while also strong in this area with a score of 9.2, is noted for its specific integrations tailored for game development, which some users find particularly beneficial.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's Quality of Support with a score of 8.7, indicating a responsive and helpful support team. Plastic SCM, with a score of 8.5, also provides good support, but some users feel that GitHub's community resources and documentation are more extensive and easier to navigate.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's Deployment Automation features score 8.9, making it easier for teams to manage their deployment processes. Plastic SCM, while scoring 8.8, is praised for its unique Branching Model that some users find advantageous for complex projects.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Task Management features score 8.9, providing a clear and organized way to manage projects. In comparison, Plastic SCM's task management capabilities, while functional, score slightly lower at 8.8, leading some users to prefer GitHub for project tracking.
- Users say that GitHub's Documentation is comprehensive and user-friendly, scoring 8.7, which helps new users get up to speed quickly. Plastic SCM's documentation, while adequate, scores lower at 8.2, with some users expressing a desire for more detailed guides and examples.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Plastic SCM
Team
$9.95
user/month
- Response < 24h
- Unity3D plugin
- Team Engine (Up to 15 users)
Free Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Plastic SCM
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,961
7.6
26
Ease of Use
8.7
1,977
7.9
26
Ease of Setup
9.0
588
8.0
16
Ease of Admin
8.7
450
7.7
16
Quality of Support
8.8
1,568
8.5
23
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
386
8.5
16
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,913
8.1
25
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
141
Not enough data
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.7
143
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
144
Not enough data
8.6
133
Not enough data
8.9
135
Not enough data
9.0
146
Not enough data
8.3
132
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
145
Not enough data
8.8
143
Not enough data
8.7
141
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
47
Not enough data
9.0
46
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
46
Not enough data
8.8
49
Not enough data
8.8
47
Not enough data
8.9
49
Not enough data
Testing
9.2
48
Not enough data
8.6
43
Not enough data
8.7
44
Not enough data
8.8
42
Not enough data
8.7
41
Not enough data
8.9
42
Not enough data
8.5
41
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.0
13
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
97
Not enough data
9.0
96
Not enough data
8.8
98
Not enough data
9.2
98
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
96
Not enough data
8.7
90
Not enough data
8.7
95
Not enough data
8.9
90
Not enough data
IT Management
9.0
98
Not enough data
8.9
90
Not enough data
8.9
88
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
237
Not enough data
9.2
240
Not enough data
8.8
237
Not enough data
Management
9.0
235
Not enough data
8.5
230
Not enough data
9.0
238
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.3
28
Not enough data
9.2
28
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
9.1
29
Not enough data
9.2
28
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
190
Not enough data
8.9
187
Not enough data
9.0
191
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.5
185
Not enough data
8.9
195
Not enough data
9.0
183
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.5
25
Not enough data
9.4
25
Not enough data
9.3
25
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
73
Not enough data
9.1
77
Not enough data
9.2
76
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
75
Not enough data
9.1
77
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
Management
8.8
136
Not enough data
9.2
135
Not enough data
8.6
132
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
133
Not enough data
8.9
135
Not enough data
8.7
133
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
135
Not enough data
8.8
133
Not enough data
9.1
137
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
222
Not enough data
8.9
211
Not enough data
8.7
203
Not enough data
Management
8.9
216
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.9
32
Not enough data
9.0
32
Not enough data
8.9
32
Not enough data
8.4
32
Not enough data
8.8
32
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
183
Not enough data
8.8
178
Not enough data
8.6
169
Not enough data
Security
8.3
166
Not enough data
8.5
167
Not enough data
9.0
176
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and Plastic SCM are categorized as Version Control Hosting
Unique Categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
Plastic SCM is categorized as Version Control Software
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Plastic SCM
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Computer Games
20.6%
Information Technology and Services
11.8%
Computer Software
8.8%
Automotive
8.8%
Gambling & Casinos
5.9%
Other
44.1%
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
What's a task branch exactly?
1 Comment
Official Response from Plastic SCM
You've probably heard of concepts like bug branches, topic branches, and so on, right? Ok, even if you haven't, here's the answer: it's a branch you use to...Read more
But aren't branches supposed to be evil incarnate?
1 Comment
Official Response from Plastic SCM
Who told you that? I bet you found that on some Subversion guide, forum, or manual, maybe even on some other SCM website, didn't you? Branches are...Read more
What's Plastic SCM?
1 Comment
Official Response from Plastic SCM
Plastic is a version control system: it versions files and directories and keeps track of branching and merging as you've never seen before. And even better?...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
