Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare F5 NGINX and Imperva App Protect 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Edgenexus ADC (Application Delivery Controller)
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
HAProxy
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $2500 per year
Free
F5 NGINX
Star Rating
(107)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $2500 per year
Browse all 3 pricing plansImperva App Protect
Star Rating
(80)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that F5 NGINX excels in Static Content Caching with a score of 8.5, which reviewers mention significantly improves website load times, while Imperva App Protect does not have a comparable feature highlighted in user reviews.
- Reviewers mention that F5 NGINX's Logging and Reporting capabilities are robust, scoring 9.3, allowing for detailed insights into traffic and performance, whereas users on G2 note that Imperva App Protect's logging features, scoring 8.0, are less comprehensive.
- G2 users highlight that F5 NGINX offers superior Performance and Reliability with a score of 9.5, which reviewers say translates to fewer downtimes and faster response times compared to Imperva App Protect, which lacks specific performance accolades.
- Users say that F5 NGINX's API / Integrations score of 8.1 is a strong point, with reviewers mentioning seamless integration with various web frameworks, while Imperva App Protect's integration capabilities, scoring 7.5, are seen as more limited.
- Reviewers mention that F5 NGINX provides better Cloud Deployment support with a score of 8.3, which users say is crucial for modern applications, while Imperva App Protect's cloud capabilities are perceived as less flexible.
- Users report that F5 NGINX's Security Monitoring features, scoring 9.0, are highly effective, with reviewers noting proactive threat detection, whereas Imperva App Protect's security monitoring, scoring 7.5, is viewed as reactive and less comprehensive.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
F5 NGINX
NGINX Plus, Single Instance
Starting at $2500
per year
24/7 Enterprise support with 30-minute SLA is available, for $5,000/year per instance.
We also provide Basic support for $2,500/year and Professional support for $3,500/year for less-critical deployments.
Imperva App Protect
Free
Free
Personal Blogs
- Bot mitigation
- Content delivery network
- Two-factor authentication
Free Trial
F5 NGINX
Free Trial is available
Imperva App Protect
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
96
8.1
79
Ease of Use
8.4
96
8.3
79
Ease of Setup
8.3
65
8.2
68
Ease of Admin
8.4
65
8.3
68
Quality of Support
7.6
70
7.5
77
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.1
45
7.6
67
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
93
7.6
77
Features by Category
Content
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Content Delivery Network (CDN)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Management
Not enough data
8.5
47
Not enough data
7.8
46
Not enough data
7.4
45
Integration
Not enough data
7.3
22
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Administration
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Threat Protection
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
9.4
21
Feature Not Available
8.9
20
Feature Not Available
9.1
20
Feature Not Available
Controls
8.4
21
Feature Not Available
9.0
21
Feature Not Available
8.3
20
Feature Not Available
Functionality
8.2
18
Feature Not Available
8.1
21
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.5
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
Protection
8.1
21
Not enough data
9.2
22
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
Resolution
7.1
23
Not enough data
7.7
21
Not enough data
7.5
21
Not enough data
7.9
21
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Data Management
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
User Features
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Modernization
8.3
7
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
AI Performance Improvement - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Server
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
F5 NGINX and Imperva App Protect are categorized as DDoS Protection and Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Unique Categories
F5 NGINX is categorized as Load Balancing, Container Networking, Web Server Accelerator, and Application Server
Imperva App Protect is categorized as Website Security and Content Delivery Network (CDN)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
F5 NGINX
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Imperva App Protect
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
38.7%
Computer Software
17.0%
Internet
7.5%
Retail
2.8%
E-Learning
2.8%
Other
31.1%
Information Technology and Services
16.5%
Internet
12.7%
Financial Services
12.7%
Computer Software
10.1%
Marketing and Advertising
6.3%
Other
41.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Improve the delivery of static resources
3 Comments
MB
Application serverRead more
F5 NGINX has no more discussions with answers
Imperva App Protect has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
