Users report that CyberArk Privileged Access Manager excels in "Multi-Factor Authentication" with a score of 9.2, which reviewers mention enhances security significantly, while Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CallManager) offers basic security features but lacks the same level of advanced authentication options.
Reviewers mention that CyberArk's "Password Vault" feature, rated at 9.7, is highly praised for its robust security and ease of use, whereas users on G2 note that Cisco's password management capabilities are less comprehensive, impacting overall user satisfaction.
G2 users highlight that CyberArk's "Temporary, time-limited privilege" feature, rated at 9.1, is particularly beneficial for managing access securely, while Cisco's access management features do not provide the same level of granularity, leading to potential security concerns.
Users say that Cisco Unified Communications Manager shines in "Conference Calls" with a score of 9.4, making it a preferred choice for organizations that prioritize communication, while CyberArk does not focus on communication features, which may limit its appeal for users needing collaboration tools.
Reviewers mention that CyberArk's "Audit Logging" feature, rated at 9.2, is crucial for compliance and security audits, whereas Cisco's logging capabilities, while functional, do not offer the same depth of detail, which could be a drawback for organizations with strict compliance requirements.
Users report that Cisco's "Video Calls" feature, rated at 8.6, is user-friendly and integrates well with other communication tools, while CyberArk does not provide video communication features, making it less suitable for teams that rely heavily on video conferencing.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.