Users report that TUNE excels in its Affiliate Tracking feature, scoring 9.2, which reviewers mention provides robust tracking capabilities for affiliate performance, while Allbound PRM, although strong, scores slightly lower at 8.7.
Reviewers mention that Allbound PRM shines in Quality of Support, with a score of 9.1, indicating that users find their customer service responsive and helpful, compared to TUNE's score of 8.7.
G2 users highlight TUNE's Individual Portals feature, which received a high score of 9.0, allowing for personalized experiences for affiliates, whereas Allbound PRM's score of 8.4 suggests it may not offer the same level of customization.
Users on G2 report that Allbound PRM's Marketing Material Bank is particularly effective, scoring 8.7, which reviewers say provides a comprehensive repository for marketing assets, while TUNE's score of 7.2 indicates room for improvement in this area.
Reviewers mention that TUNE's Custom Attribution feature, scoring 8.5, allows for tailored tracking solutions, which is a significant advantage over Allbound PRM's lower score in this category.
Users say that Allbound PRM's Ease of Use is a standout feature, with a score of 8.8, making it more user-friendly compared to TUNE's score of 8.4, which some users find slightly less intuitive.
Yes, you can search via content specification or by nameRead more
What is channelIT used for?
1 Comment
Official Response from Channel Mechanics PRM
The world’s leading vendors use Channel Mechanics PRM solution to automate the business of working with partners so that they can focus on the relationships....Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.