Compare Canopy and Double 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (97.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (97.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$24.00 1 User Per Month
$10.00 1 Connected client Per Month
Canopy
Star Rating
(650)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (97.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$24.00 1 User Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 5 pricing plansDouble
Star Rating
(79)5.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (97.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$10.00 1 Connected client Per Month
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Canopy excels in user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher overall score compared to Double. Users appreciate its intuitive interface and the platform's ability to support various aspects of client advisory work, making it a robust choice for small businesses.
- According to verified reviews, Canopy's implementation process is praised for being quick and user-friendly. Recent users highlight that the platform is constantly evolving based on feedback, which enhances its usability and keeps it aligned with user needs.
- Users say that Double (formerly Keeper) shines in its integrations and the ability to handle multiple accounting tasks within a single program. Reviewers appreciate the software's feature-rich environment and the responsiveness of the support team, which helps address specific firm needs effectively.
- Reviewers mention that while Canopy has a strong overall performance, it faces challenges in certain areas like reporting and invoicing, where users feel it could improve. In contrast, Double has received positive feedback for its ease of communication with clients, particularly regarding timely responses to inquiries.
- G2 reviewers highlight that Canopy's support quality is commendable, with users noting the platform's responsiveness to feedback and updates. This commitment to improvement is a key factor in its higher satisfaction ratings compared to Double.
- According to recent user feedback, Double's focus on customer collaboration and feature development is a strong point, but it may not match Canopy's overall user experience and satisfaction levels. Users feel that Canopy's consistent updates and user-friendly design give it an edge in daily usability.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Canopy
Time & Billing*
$24.00
1 User Per Month
*Client Management required.
- Invoicing
- Time tracking
- Reporting
Double
Double Core
$10.00
1 Connected client Per Month
Everything you need to run your best month-end close, every month.
- 2-way ledger integration
- Custom-branded client portal
- Integrated email
Free Trial
Canopy
Free Trial is available
Double
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
404
9.6
67
Ease of Use
8.9
451
9.3
71
Ease of Setup
8.2
325
9.3
49
Ease of Admin
8.7
221
9.8
33
Quality of Support
9.0
394
9.9
65
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
219
9.9
33
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
392
10.0
69
Features by Category
Platform Additional Functionality
9.3
85
Not enough data
7.0
80
Not enough data
8.0
81
Not enough data
8.9
81
Not enough data
Platform Content
8.1
84
Not enough data
Platform Data
7.9
81
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Tax Practice Management
6.5
50
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
6.3
50
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Reconciliation
Not enough data
8.9
26
Not enough data
9.4
38
Not enough data
9.2
40
Reporting
Not enough data
8.7
49
Not enough data
9.7
42
Not enough data
9.1
41
Closing Process
Not enough data
9.7
34
Not enough data
7.7
32
Not enough data
8.9
28
AI - Financial Close
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
8.9
253
9.6
49
8.1
252
9.1
47
8.2
243
9.2
31
Collaboration
8.4
245
9.1
46
8.7
250
9.6
46
8.4
236
9.2
34
Billing
8.1
239
8.8
38
7.4
244
8.6
44
7.8
241
6.9
23
Onboarding
8.2
248
9.1
46
7.9
245
9.4
47
8.5
246
9.3
49
Visibility
8.3
250
9.6
41
7.5
241
8.5
39
8.9
249
7.7
47
7.7
240
8.4
38
8.5
249
9.2
48
7.4
241
9.1
49
Agentic AI - Accounting Practice Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Canopy and Double are categorized as Accounting Practice Management
Unique Categories
Canopy is categorized as Tax Practice Management
Double is categorized as Financial Close
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Canopy
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Double
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Accounting
92.2%
Financial Services
4.5%
Law Practice
0.9%
Airlines/Aviation
0.7%
Consulting
0.3%
Other
1.4%
Accounting
96.2%
Professional Training & Coaching
1.3%
Financial Services
1.3%
Computer Software
1.3%
‐
Other
0.0%
Discussions
Tax data manipulation
2 Comments
JP
We use Canopy to assist clients to know what information we need.Read more
What is the best way to transition to Canopy's time/billing option?
1 Comment
TT
Hi Tiffany- Happy to hear you're interested in streamlining more of your practice with Canopy! Getting set up with Canopy Payments starts with a simple...Read more
Canopy has no more discussions with answers
Double has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.
