When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found FloQast easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with FloQast overall.
Reviewers felt that FloQast meets the needs of their business better than Cadency by Trintech.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that FloQast is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of FloQast over Cadency by Trintech.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cadency by Trintech
No pricing available
FloQast
No pricing available
Free Trial
Cadency by Trintech
No trial information available
FloQast
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
121
9.1
1,171
Ease of Use
8.4
125
9.3
1,181
Ease of Setup
7.8
90
8.9
635
Ease of Admin
7.8
95
9.1
440
Quality of Support
8.4
120
9.4
1,052
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
No, it won't replace them, it will link to them, and to your ERP system to bring them together in one place. That is what we really like about FloQast - we...Read more
Will FloQast be compatible with my existing ERP/ GL System?
1 Comment
RW
FloQast integrates with many systems so there would be no need to export a TB manually. If you're using NetSuite or Sage Intacct you would connect directly....Read more
What is the best way to automate trial balance uploads?
1 Comment
SS
FloQast offers a feature called FloQast Connect that will automate your trial balance uploads. This allows organizations with on-premise legacy or enterprise...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.