Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cacheflow and Conga CPQ 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
FlexPay
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (75.8% of reviews)
Enterprise (57.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us 1 User Per Month
Cacheflow
Star Rating
(35)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (75.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CacheflowConga CPQ
Star Rating
(180)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (57.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 User Per Month
Learn more about Conga CPQSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Conga CPQ excels in its Document Signing feature, with a high rating of 9.3, making it a reliable choice for businesses that prioritize secure and efficient signing processes. In contrast, Cacheflow also offers strong signing capabilities but does not match the same level of user satisfaction.
- Reviewers mention that Cacheflow shines in Configuration Rules with a score of 9.1, indicating a more intuitive setup for complex pricing structures compared to Conga CPQ's score of 8.0. This makes Cacheflow a better option for companies needing flexible configuration options.
- G2 users highlight the superior Ease of Use of Cacheflow, which scored 9.0, compared to Conga CPQ's 7.9. Reviewers appreciate Cacheflow's user-friendly interface, which simplifies the onboarding process for new users.
- Users on G2 report that Conga CPQ's Quality of Support is rated at 7.7, which is lower than Cacheflow's impressive 9.3. This suggests that Cacheflow may provide more responsive and effective customer service, a critical factor for businesses needing ongoing support.
- Reviewers mention that Cacheflow's Billing Automation feature is rated at 9.0, showcasing its efficiency in managing billing processes, while Conga CPQ's rating of 8.0 indicates room for improvement in this area.
- Users say that Conga CPQ's Signature Workflow is rated at 9.4, which is a standout feature for those who require a streamlined process for managing signatures, whereas Cacheflow's workflow capabilities, while strong, do not reach the same level of user satisfaction.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cacheflow
No pricing availableConga CPQ
See Conga CPQ in action
Contact Us
1 User Per Month
Deliver accurate quotes faster for bigger deals, better margins, and a higher win rate.
Close sales efficiently:
Manage unlimited solution configurations
Optimize pricing to win deals
Streamline product bundling and customization
- Single Data Model: Built on a unified data architecture, Conga CPQ ensures consistent, synchronized data across your entire revenue lifecycle—from CRM to CLM and Billing—reducing errors and manual entry.
- Enterprise-Grade Complexity and Scalability: Conga CPQ is engineered to support global enterprise needs, handling advanced configurations, pricing scenarios, and quoting volumes with ease. It’s trusted by Fortune 500 companies to manage scale without compromise.
- Simplified Administration: Empower business users with low-code tools to manage product catalogs, rules, and pricing logic—eliminating IT bottlenecks and reducing administrative overhead.
Free Trial
Cacheflow
Free Trial is available
Conga CPQ
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
31
8.1
146
Ease of Use
8.9
31
7.9
147
Ease of Setup
8.7
21
7.5
92
Ease of Admin
9.2
8
7.9
90
Quality of Support
9.3
30
7.8
133
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
8
8.4
92
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
31
8.0
140
Features by Category
Configuration - cpq
Not enough data
8.4
101
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
75
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
97
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
101
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
92
|
Verified
Pricing
Not enough data
8.1
100
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
102
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
87
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
92
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
97
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
81
|
Verified
Quoting
Not enough data
8.2
84
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
88
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
99
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
86
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
80
|
Verified
Admin
Not enough data
8.1
60
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
60
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
56
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
56
|
Verified
Channels
Not enough data
8.2
63
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
54
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
54
|
Verified
Platform
Not enough data
9.0
54
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
42
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
56
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
58
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI - cpq
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Document Creation
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
7.9
21
Not enough data
8.8
22
Not enough data
9.0
23
Not enough data
8.7
24
Not enough data
Workflow
8.9
22
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
Analytics
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.1
21
Not enough data
7.7
21
Not enough data
Administration and Platform
9.0
24
Not enough data
8.0
24
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
9.3
23
Not enough data
8.8
22
Not enough data
8.5
23
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.3
17
Not enough data
Billing and Payments
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Revenue Recognition
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Revenue Optimization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Billing
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
Dunning
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
Performance
9.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
Reporting
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Subscription Billing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customer Requirements
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Contracts
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Revenue
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cacheflow and Conga CPQ are categorized as Quote-to-Cash and CPQ
Unique Categories
Conga CPQ has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cacheflow
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Conga CPQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
57.6%
Information Technology and Services
27.3%
Security and Investigations
3.0%
Food & Beverages
3.0%
Education Management
3.0%
Other
6.1%
Computer Software
32.7%
Information Technology and Services
16.4%
Internet
4.1%
Hospital & Health Care
3.5%
Computer & Network Security
3.5%
Other
39.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Cacheflow has no discussions with answers
Apttus CPQ Integration with Oracle EBS R12 and SFDC
1 Comment
DC
We are also looking the same integration solutions between these applications.
Apttus CPQ Integration requirements with Oracle EBS R12 and SFDC.
Any help...Read more
Conga CPQ has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
