Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Buffer and SocialOomph 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cloud Campaign
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Planable
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
$17.97 every two weeks
Buffer
Star Rating
(1,023)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansSocialOomph
Star Rating
(21)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$17.97 every two weeks
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Buffer excels in its Content Calendar feature, scoring 9.2, which allows for seamless scheduling and planning of posts across multiple platforms. In contrast, SocialOomph, while still functional, does not match this level of user satisfaction, indicating a need for improvement in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Buffer's Ease of Use is significantly higher at 9.2 compared to SocialOomph's 7.9, making it a more user-friendly option for those new to social media management tools.
- G2 users highlight Buffer's superior Social Publishing capabilities, scoring 9.3, which allows for efficient and effective post scheduling. SocialOomph, with a score of 8.6, offers similar features but lacks the intuitive interface that Buffer provides.
- Users on G2 report that Buffer's Quality of Support is rated at 8.5, indicating a strong customer service experience, while SocialOomph's support is rated lower at 7.6, suggesting that users may face challenges when seeking assistance.
- Reviewers mention that Buffer's Campaign Planning feature is robust and well-received, contributing to its overall higher ratings. SocialOomph, while offering campaign features, does not receive the same level of praise, indicating potential gaps in functionality.
- Users say that Buffer's Content Library feature, rated at 8.7, allows for easy access and organization of media assets, which is a significant advantage over SocialOomph, where users have reported difficulties in managing content effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Buffer
Free
Free
For individuals and businesses getting started with social media.
- 3 social accounts
- Publish to Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn, Google Business Profiles, Mastodon, Pinterest and Bluesky
- 10 scheduled posts per social account
Free Trial
Buffer
Free Trial is available
SocialOomph
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
900
7.7
18
Ease of Use
9.2
906
7.9
19
Ease of Setup
9.2
325
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.1
309
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.5
644
7.6
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
269
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.2
880
7.5
19
Features by Category
Content & Collaboration
9.0(won by default)
142
Not enough data
8.6(won by default)
125
Not enough data
8.2(won by default)
105
Not enough data
8.6(won by default)
106
Not enough data
8.8(won by default)
115
Not enough data
8.5(won by default)
99
Not enough data
Social Management
7.9
666
8.5(won by 0.6)
13
9.3(won by 0.7)
787
8.6
16
8.4(won by 0.8)
642
7.6
16
8.3
693
8.6(won by 0.3)
15
Feature Not Available
8.1(won by default)
6
8.6(won by default)
99
Not enough data
8.3(won by default)
25
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Social Media Management
7.2(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.4(won by default)
12
Not enough data
6.9(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.4(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.2(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.5(won by default)
12
Not enough data
7.2(won by default)
12
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Buffer and SocialOomph are categorized as Social Media Management
Unique Categories
Buffer has no unique categories
SocialOomph has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Buffer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SocialOomph
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Marketing and Advertising
23.1%
Computer Software
7.3%
Information Technology and Services
6.3%
Internet
5.3%
Non-Profit Organization Management
4.2%
Other
53.8%
Marketing and Advertising
33.3%
Management Consulting
14.3%
Professional Training & Coaching
9.5%
Writing and Editing
4.8%
Online Media
4.8%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Can I have tabs open for multiple companies at a time?
4 Comments
MM
I have one Buffer account with multiple clients on that one account, so I just click on which platform/client I want to work on within that (so just one...Read more
Which platforms are next on the Buffer integration roadmap?
2 Comments
GP
Buffer has a new feature to offer: Shop Grid.
It is a landing page made specifically for your Instagram profile, where you can direct people back to your...Read more
LinkedIn workarounds
2 Comments
ED
When a data source like Facebook or LinkedIn removes an API (the way the data is shared from their warehouse to someone else’s, like Buffer’s, and the way...Read more
SocialOomph has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
