Users report that IBM Cloudant excels in Ease of Setup with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for quick deployment, while Azure Cosmos DB has a lower score of 8.6 in this area.
Reviewers mention that IBM Cloudant's Data Model is rated highly at 9.0, which allows for flexible data structures, whereas Azure Cosmos DB's score of 8.3 indicates it may not be as adaptable for certain use cases.
G2 users highlight that IBM Cloudant offers superior Data Replication capabilities with a score of 9.4, ensuring high availability and reliability, compared to Azure Cosmos DB's score of 8.7, which may not meet the same level of redundancy.
Users on G2 note that Azure Cosmos DB shines in Indexing with a score of 8.6, providing efficient query performance, while IBM Cloudant's score of 7.3 suggests it may lag behind in this critical area.
Reviewers mention that IBM Cloudant has a strong focus on Quality of Support with a score of 8.0, but Azure Cosmos DB outperforms it with a score of 8.6, indicating a more robust support system for users.
Users say that Azure Cosmos DB's Security features, particularly in Role-Based Authorization with a score of 8.1, are more comprehensive compared to IBM Cloudant's score of 7.5, which may leave some users wanting more in terms of access control.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Cosmos DB
No pricing available
IBM Cloudant
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure Cosmos DB
No trial information available
IBM Cloudant
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
48
8.7
31
Ease of Use
8.2
48
8.6
31
Ease of Setup
8.0
22
9.2
10
Ease of Admin
7.7
23
8.5
10
Quality of Support
8.2
46
8.0
29
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.