Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Camel and WSO2 Integrator 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Omatic Software
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (53.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache Camel
Star Rating
(20)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache CamelWSO2 Integrator
Star Rating
(31)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about WSO2 IntegratorSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that WSO2 Integrator excels in its ability to handle complex integration scenarios, particularly with its Data Services feature, which allows for seamless data access and manipulation across various sources.
- Reviewers mention that Apache Camel shines in its extensive library of pre-built connectors, making it easier for users to integrate with a wide range of systems without extensive custom coding.
- G2 users highlight that WSO2 Integrator has a slightly steeper learning curve, with an Ease of Use score of 7.9, while Apache Camel is praised for its user-friendly interface, reflected in its higher score of 9.2.
- Users on G2 report that WSO2 Integrator's support quality is commendable, with a score of 8.3, but Apache Camel edges out with a score of 8.6, indicating a more responsive support experience.
- Reviewers say that WSO2 Integrator's product direction is viewed positively by 8.7% of users, suggesting a strong roadmap, while Apache Camel's lower score of 7.1 indicates some concerns about its future development and updates.
- Users report that WSO2 Integrator is particularly beneficial for mid-market companies, as it caters well to their integration needs, while Apache Camel is favored by small businesses for its flexibility and ease of setup.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Camel
No pricing availableWSO2 Integrator
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache Camel
No trial information availableWSO2 Integrator
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
15
8.4
27
Ease of Use
9.2
15
8.0
27
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.2
24
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.4
15
Quality of Support
8.6
12
8.5
25
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.6
16
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
16
9.1
27
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Camel and WSO2 Integrator are categorized as Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
Unique Categories
Apache Camel has no unique categories
WSO2 Integrator is categorized as On-Premise Data Integration
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Camel
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
WSO2 Integrator
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
30.0%
Computer Software
10.0%
Utilities
5.0%
Telecommunications
5.0%
Insurance
5.0%
Other
45.0%
Computer Software
16.7%
Banking
13.3%
Manufacturing
6.7%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Financial Services
6.7%
Other
50.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Apache Camel has no discussions with answers
WSO2 Integrator has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
