Azure Service Bus Reviews & Product Details

Dead Letter Queue, Message Queues and Topics, Decoupling Applications, Publisher-Subscriber Model, Partitioning and Scaling, Message Filtering, Hybrid Connectivity, We have implemented a Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Throughput Limitations, sometimes if in case our tier is a low tier and we have to handle busy scenarios it wont work and message size limit it wont work for larger payload messages. When dealing with topics and understanding and implementing topics and subscriptions is not an easy in one time go. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is effortless to integrate this in your Azure projects; they offer incredible ways to scale your systems without spending too much money on it, and with Azure function, they are just delightful Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As with many Azure services, their principal use is with other Azure services; this is limiting sometimes but still worth using if you are already on Azure, although this doesn't mean that it is not useful with other technologies, just that is easier with other Azure solutions Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to use, effective solution and no scalability issue. It was easy to adopt and implement and liked the dashboard screens and mobile based approvals. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes felt that the documentation is a little complex to understand for beginners. But once I got my hands on it was easy to explore and get our issues resolved quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Message transformations and scalability is what I liked the most. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Need to better notify and known issue, bugs Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

role management and throughput are good in axure service bus Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I couldnt think of any aspect where i dislike azure service bus, it does its purpose. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

High scalability with the ability to trigger an Azure Function directly. There are many settings to adjust according to the use case, so it's a very flexible solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Tricky to monitor properly, though the tools exist natively to do this. The documentation on this is getting better, but still requires hands-on experience to get it right. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Thanks to the SB, we can have decoupled architecture and scalability easy; you can let the SBQ accumulate the message and let your systems handle them as they can without paying enormous expensive resource for a couple of minutes of high traffic Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Depuration is hard. The Azure Portal UI SB is hard to use since it does not have a lot of options for visualizaation; you can use the unofficial SB explorer tool, but it isn't lovely, and I would rather have an official tool for SB exploration Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We used azure for purchasing and payments to suppliers. I like the dashboard and the ease of approvals using mobile. I didn’t use this as much as my employees, but the workflow was efficient. I also liked the ability to see everything in one snapshot. The suppliers thought it was more user friendly than other software they used for their clients. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I hated approving things from the PC! Honestly, if I got an approval request on my pc, I would pick up my phone and approve it from there. I also didn’t like that if I got a reminder to approve something I may have missed, there was no link to see it. I had to go tot the sight and manually log in. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Perhaps the biggest advantage of Microsoft Azure is its ease of integration with other Microsoft products. If you're used to using Excel, Access, SQL Server, and other Microsoft products, Azure will fit in nicely.

Azure does a good job at pointing the user into user-friendly methods for data capture and analysis. In fact, I think Azure does the best job at this compared to competing tools.

Microsoft Azure has recently made strides in implementing advanced analytics, such as machine learning. Their advances are great and integrate nicely with the tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Risk of regression. Since all applications are talking via a centralised entity, any change to the entity bears a risk of introducing a regression. Mitigating this risk is an expensive undertaking, usually requiring investment into automated testing. Never have an ESB without continous integration and very high automated test coverage Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Never been trained or expose to Azure and the simplicity of their UX made me self-thought and complete my goal. Every clicks and changes and consistent so it's easy for me to navigate and follow the Knowledge Center instructions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Might be just cosmetic but the color scheme. Wish we can customize it to it would look seamless on our company color theme. Some of the standard object/field as well, I wish can be repurposed. Since API will be the same name we plan to use but it's part of the standard object, it would be easier for our developer if they can just repurpose it rather than creating a similar name -- for easier coding. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.