Compare Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and IBM Netezza Performance Server 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (59.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Star Rating
(901)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)IBM Netezza Performance Server
Star Rating
(84)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (59.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IBM Netezza Performance ServerAmazon Relational Database Service (RDS) vs IBM Netezza Performance Server
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found them equally easy to use. However, Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is easier to set up and administer.reviewers also preferred doing business with Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) overall.
- Reviewers felt that Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) meets the needs of their business better than IBM Netezza Performance Server.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) over IBM Netezza Performance Server.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
No pricing availableIBM Netezza Performance Server
No pricing availableFree Trial
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Free Trial is available
IBM Netezza Performance Server
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
739
8.4
55
Ease of Use
8.8
747
8.8
53
Ease of Setup
8.9
523
8.3
23
Ease of Admin
8.7
435
8.2
24
Quality of Support
8.6
711
8.3
48
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
423
7.9
23
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
701
6.7
50
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Federation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Transformation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
8.6
13
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
12
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
11
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
9
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
9
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
11
|
Verified
Integration
Not enough data
7.5
8
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
11
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.2
10
|
Verified
Deployment
Not enough data
8.7
9
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
11
|
Verified
Performance
Not enough data
8.5
9
|
Verified
Security
Not enough data
8.9
11
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
10
|
Verified
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.8
305
Not enough data
8.9
309
Not enough data
8.8
294
Not enough data
8.9
304
Not enough data
Support
8.3
300
Not enough data
8.7
311
Not enough data
8.6
305
Not enough data
8.8
309
Not enough data
Security
8.6
298
Not enough data
8.7
314
Not enough data
8.8
308
Not enough data
8.8
311
Not enough data
Performance
8.8
305
Not enough data
8.6
299
Not enough data
8.7
307
Not enough data
8.5
293
Not enough data
8.5
297
Not enough data
Database Features
9.0
437
Not enough data
9.2
437
Not enough data
9.0
433
Not enough data
9.2
423
Not enough data
9.1
431
Not enough data
8.5
402
Not enough data
8.7
419
Not enough data
Configuration
8.8
245
Not enough data
8.4
240
Not enough data
8.6
248
Not enough data
8.0
225
Not enough data
8.9
239
Not enough data
Database Administration
8.8
240
Not enough data
8.6
230
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Availability
9.1
245
Not enough data
9.1
249
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
231
Not enough data
Security
8.3
170
Not enough data
8.6
179
Not enough data
8.4
169
Not enough data
Data Management
8.8
185
Not enough data
8.6
174
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) and IBM Netezza Performance Server share no categories
Unique Categories
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS) and Relational Databases
IBM Netezza Performance Server is categorized as Data Warehouse and Data Virtualization
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
IBM Netezza Performance Server
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Computer Software
17.0%
Financial Services
6.1%
Computer & Network Security
3.7%
Telecommunications
3.3%
Other
47.2%
Information Technology and Services
19.4%
Banking
11.9%
Insurance
11.9%
Retail
7.5%
Financial Services
6.0%
Other
43.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) used for?
2 Comments
AJ
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is a cloud-based service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that is used for managing and operating relational...Read more
An Amazon RDS performance best practice is to allocate enough RAM so that your working set resides almost completely in memory.
1 Comment
SS
niceRead more
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) has no more discussions with answers
IBM Netezza Performance Server has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
