Users report that Altair HyperWorks excels in its Finite Element Analysis capabilities, scoring 8.8, which reviewers mention is particularly beneficial for complex simulations. In contrast, Moldflow's score of 7.3 indicates it may not be as robust in this area.
Reviewers mention that Moldflow shines in Manufacturing Process Simulation with a score of 8.8, which is higher than Altair HyperWorks' 8.3. Users appreciate Moldflow's specific features for simulating injection molding processes effectively.
Users on G2 highlight the Ease of Setup for Moldflow, scoring a perfect 9.0, while Altair HyperWorks lacks a score in this area. This suggests that Moldflow may be more user-friendly for new users starting out.
Reviewers mention that Altair HyperWorks offers superior Editing Tools with a score of 9.0, which users say allows for more precise modifications in their designs compared to Moldflow's score of 7.8.
G2 users report that Altair HyperWorks has a strong Hardware Support score of 9.3, indicating compatibility with a wide range of systems, while Moldflow's score of 8.2 suggests it may have some limitations in this area.
Users say that both products have strong Quality of Support, but Moldflow edges out with a score of 8.6 compared to Altair HyperWorks' 7.6, indicating that users may find Moldflow's customer service more responsive and helpful.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Altair HyperWorks
No pricing available
Moldflow
No pricing available
Free Trial
Altair HyperWorks
No trial information available
Moldflow
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
46
8.5
18
Ease of Use
7.6
46
8.6
18
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.0
7
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.4
8
Quality of Support
7.6
43
8.6
17
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.