Users report that OpenFOAM excels in fluid analysis with a score of 8.8, making it a preferred choice for those focused on computational fluid dynamics, while Abaqus, with a score of 8.2, is noted for its strong capabilities in finite element analysis, particularly in structural simulations.
Reviewers mention that OpenFOAM's command clarity is rated at 7.2, which some users find less intuitive compared to Abaqus's higher score of 8.6, indicating that Abaqus may offer a more user-friendly interface for managing complex simulations.
G2 users highlight that OpenFOAM's support quality is rated at 6.1, which some users find lacking, whereas Abaqus receives a much higher score of 8.1, suggesting that users may have a better experience with customer support and resources when using Abaqus.
Users on G2 report that OpenFOAM's editing tools score 6.8, which some find adequate but not exceptional, while Abaqus's editing tools are rated at 6.5, indicating that both products have room for improvement in this area, but OpenFOAM may have a slight edge.
Reviewers say that OpenFOAM is particularly strong in discrete event modeling with a score of 6.7, but Abaqus outperforms it in continuous event modeling with a score of 8.1, making Abaqus a better choice for users needing robust continuous simulation capabilities.
Users report that while OpenFOAM is popular among small businesses, with 63.6% of reviews coming from this segment, Abaqus also serves a significant small-business market at 46.9%, indicating that both products are viable options for smaller enterprises looking for simulation software.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing available
OpenFOAM
No pricing available
Free Trial
Abaqus
No trial information available
OpenFOAM
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
37
8.0
26
Ease of Use
7.5
38
6.7
26
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
35
6.1
21
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
What do you use as mesher? Are there free ones that are good for complex geometries?
1 Comment
CH
I used snappyHexMesh to mesh a complicated geometry and it did well. Many like cfMesh too. If snappyHexMesh is used, can use blockMesh to generate background...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.