Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Abaqus and Mathematica

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Abaqus
Abaqus
Star Rating
(50)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.9% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Abaqus
Mathematica
Mathematica
Star Rating
(86)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.3% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Mathematica
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Mathematica excels in 3D/solid modeling tools with a score of 8.5, while Abaqus falls short with a score of 6.4. Reviewers mention that Mathematica's advanced modeling capabilities allow for more intricate designs and simulations.
  • Reviewers say that Mathematica's editing tools are highly rated at 8.7, compared to Abaqus's 6.5. Users on G2 highlight that Mathematica offers a more intuitive interface for making adjustments to models, which enhances productivity.
  • G2 users note that while both products offer fluid analysis capabilities, Mathematica scores higher at 8.8 versus Abaqus's 8.2. Users mention that Mathematica provides more comprehensive tools for simulating fluid dynamics effectively.
  • Users say that Abaqus shines in finite element analysis with a score of 8.8, outperforming Mathematica's 8.1. Reviewers mention that Abaqus's specialized features for structural analysis make it a preferred choice for engineers focused on detailed simulations.
  • Reviewers mention that Mathematica's manufacturing process simulation is rated exceptionally high at 9.4, while Abaqus scores 8.0. Users report that Mathematica's tools for simulating manufacturing processes are robust and user-friendly, making it easier to visualize production workflows.
  • Users on G2 highlight that both products have similar command clarity scores of 8.6, but Mathematica's overall user experience is often described as more seamless, with reviewers noting that the clarity of commands enhances their workflow efficiency.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing available
Mathematica
No pricing available
Free Trial
Abaqus
No trial information available
Mathematica
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
37
8.4
78
Ease of Use
7.5
38
7.3
80
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
35
7.9
76
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.4
36
8.1
79
Features by Category
7.8
24
8.5
15
Design
6.4
18
8.5
8
6.6
18
8.1
9
6.5
19
8.7
10
7.0
16
8.8
8
Tools
8.2
14
8.8
8
8.8
22
8.1
8
8.1
16
7.9
8
Work
7.9
15
8.5
12
8.1
13
8.2
12
8.4
18
8.3
11
8.0
14
9.4
9
8.0
11
9.0
12
Environment
7.0
15
8.2
10
8.3
12
8.3
11
8.5
13
8.3
9
8.6
18
8.6
12
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Abaqus
Abaqus
Mathematica
Mathematica
Abaqus and Mathematica are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Abaqus
Abaqus has no unique categories
Mathematica
Mathematica has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Abaqus
Abaqus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
46.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
24.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
28.6%
Mathematica
Mathematica
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
31.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
45.3%
Reviewers' Industry
Abaqus
Abaqus
Higher Education
20.4%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
16.3%
Automotive
16.3%
Aviation & Aerospace
12.2%
Research
10.2%
Other
24.5%
Mathematica
Mathematica
Research
17.4%
Information Technology and Services
9.3%
Higher Education
8.1%
Computer Software
7.0%
Automotive
7.0%
Other
51.2%
Alternatives
Abaqus
Abaqus Alternatives
Ansys Mechanical
Ansys Mechanical
Add Ansys Mechanical
MATLAB
MATLAB
Add MATLAB
SolidWorks Simulation
SolidWorks Simulation
Add SolidWorks Simulation
Altair HyperWorks
Altair HyperWorks
Add Altair HyperWorks
Mathematica
Mathematica Alternatives
MATLAB
MATLAB
Add MATLAB
Scilab
Scilab
Add Scilab
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Add GNU Octave
Maple
Maple
Add Maple
Discussions
Abaqus
Abaqus Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Abaqus has no discussions with answers
Mathematica
Mathematica Discussions
Is Mathematica used in industry?
1 Comment
Is Mathematica better than Matlab?
1 Comment
Dhananjay S.
DS
no but in most of case is more useful Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Mathematica has no more discussions with answers