Best Survey Software - Page 54

Surveyo

Surveyol

Surveysides

SwiftAssess Co-Proctor

SwiftAssess Co-Proctor is an AI-powered remote proctoring solution designed to protect assessment integrity across remote, hybrid, test-centre and high-stakes assessment environments. It combines identity verification, environment checks, behavioural monitoring, secure browser technologies, multi-stream AI analysis and evidence-based review workflows to help institutions detect risks while maintaining fairness and transparency. Available as both a standalone solution and as part of the SwiftAssess ecosystem, Co-Proctor integrates with existing assessment platforms through LTI, APIs and SDKs, enabling organisations to strengthen exam security without disrupting existing workflows.

SwiftAssess SmartPaper

SwiftAssess SmartPaper is an AI-powered paper assessment solution that modernises traditional exams without requiring institutions to abandon paper workflows. It helps schools, universities, certification bodies, and training organisations automate scanning, grading, analysis, and reporting while maintaining the familiarity of paper-based testing. SmartPaper bridges the gap between paper and digital assessment, enabling institutions to improve efficiency, reduce manual effort, increase accuracy, and gain actionable insights from every assessment

Synthetic Respondents

Synthetic Respondents (HumanAI)

Tablez

Tablez is an online table booking system for independent restaurants, pubs, cafes, bars and hotel restaurants. Every venue gets its own booking page and link, a QR poster, a booking widget for any website, and a staff app for phones and tablets. Customers book in under a minute in any of 14 languages, with no account or app, and get automatic confirmation and reminder emails that cut no-shows. Paid plans add a drag and drop live floor plan, waitlist, guest profiles and notes, text reminders, reports, deposits and card holds through the venue's own Stripe account, events with set menus and pre-orders, a kitchen screen and AI phone answering. Tablez is free for up to 60 bookings a month, then from £9.99 a month, with no per cover fees, no commission and free setup help by phone or video call.

TeamDock

TeamDock is a team management platform designed for competitive youth and amateur sports teams. It gives coaches and managers one place to organize communication, schedules, roster information, externally hosted game video, timestamped Film Room notes, player feedback, team news, photos, sponsors, fundraising, polls, and public team content. TeamDock is built around the day-to-day needs of a single team rather than league-wide registration or administration. Coaches can connect video from services such as YouTube or Vimeo, add timestamped notes, tag players or team concepts, and share private feedback with individual players and their linked parents. Each team also receives a branded public page for news, schedule information, photos, sponsors, and other public-facing content, while private team information remains restricted to approved members. TeamDock currently supports hockey, basketball and Soccer/Football teams, with mobile access available through native iOS and Android apps.

techinterview.live

I've run 200+ technical interviews across two post-Series-B companies. Both on the technical committee and as hiring manager. Every tool I used billed like enterprise SaaS. Subscriptions, seat minimums, annual contracts. For something we used a few hours a week. So I built TechInterview.live. Live coding in a real editor. Excalidraw for system design. A Chrome extension that runs the whole workspace inside Google Meet. Candidates join with a link. No account, no download. Pricing is the way I always wanted it. From €2.50 per live interview. One-time credits that never expire. No subscription. You start with 6 free credits, no card needed. And we don't retain your candidates' data.

Teemly

Teemly is an assessment operations platform built in India for schools, colleges and coaching institutes. Most institutions already collect enough information about their students to answer the questions that matter - which topics a batch keeps failing, which class has drifted below the rest, which questions are teaching and which are just hard. Almost none of them can reach it. Results sit in separate spreadsheets, paper tests never land in the same record as online ones, and a final mark says a student did badly without saying why. Teemly closes that gap, from the question bank through to the report. A QUESTION LIBRARY THE INSTITUTION OWNS Questions live in one shared library rather than in individual teachers' files. Each carries its subject, topic, difficulty and curriculum tags, and coding questions carry their languages, sample and hidden test cases, and input/output mode alongside them. Every question shows where it has been used and how it has performed, so a teacher building a paper can see at a glance which questions are unused, which are reliable, and which a batch has consistently failed. Because questions are tagged once and reused, the same tags drive reporting later. Topic-level reporting is a by-product of how the bank is organised rather than a separate exercise someone has to maintain. BUILDING AND SENDING A TEST Assemble a paper from the library with coding, multiple-choice and written questions together, set marks per question, and publish it to a whole class or to selected students - for make-ups, remedial work or targeted practice. Schedule when it opens and when it closes, set duration and attempt rules, shuffle questions, and apply negative marking or partial credit where the assessment calls for it. Times follow the institution's own timezone, whichever device they were set from. RUNNING TESTS ONLINE Students write, run and debug real code in the browser, against sample cases they can see and hidden cases they cannot. There is nothing to install. Integrity events - leaving fullscreen, switching tabs, clipboard activity - are recorded while the test runs, and students are warned before anything is enforced. What matters is what happens afterwards: a flag opens a review, it does not decide the outcome. Every decision is signed off by a named teacher with the original evidence preserved, which is the difference between a system a school can defend to a parent and one it cannot. PAPER ASSESSMENTS ARE FIRST-CLASS Most institutions will run paper tests for years yet, and a platform that treats them as legacy forces a choice nobody wants to make. Print a question paper and its matching answer key directly from the same bank, conduct the test as usual, and enter the marks afterwards. They land in the same student record as online results, against the same class, subject and term. Absences are kept distinct from scores of zero, and unfinished grading stays out of standings until it is finished, so an average always says what it is based on. GRADING Objective and coding answers are evaluated automatically against their test cases. Written answers move into a grading queue rather than a teacher's inbox, so a paper with several markers can be tracked to completion instead of chased. Regrades correct the record rather than inflating it. REPORTING - THE REASON THE REST EXISTS Performance breaks down by class, subject, topic and question type, across assessments and across terms. An institution can see its overall average and which classes sit above or below it, which topics are weakest, which questions a batch keeps getting wrong across every paper they have appeared in, who has not attempted yet, and what is still awaiting grading. The reports open on what needs attention rather than on a wall of numbers: integrity events to review, responses still to grade, learners who have not attempted, classes and subjects running below target - each with the action that clears it. Reports export, and on higher plans they can be scheduled to department heads automatically. ADMINISTRATION Import students in bulk rather than one at a time. Organise them into classes, sections or batches, map teachers to what they teach, and give administrators, teachers and students their own views of the same data. Teemly runs multiple institutions independently, so a group or chain keeps each one's records separate while an owner sees across them. BUILT FOR TEACHING, NOT HIRING Coding assessment tools are mostly built to screen candidates for a job. They answer one question well: should we advance this person? An institution needs a different one: what does this student not understand yet, and what should happen in the next class? That difference runs through the product. Results attach to a student across a term rather than to a one-off attempt, reporting is organised by topic and cohort rather than by candidate ranking, and paper assessments are supported rather than migrated away from. WHO USES IT Schools running internal assessments and term examinations across classes and subjects. Colleges and universities running internals, practicals and semester-end assessments across departments. Coaching institutes running mock test series where batch-level performance and question-level difficulty matter more than any single score. DATA Student assessment data is held under a published retention policy, with a data processing agreement and a student data notice available to institutions that need them for their own compliance.

Tempo Custom Charts for Confluence

Create and share all kinds of highly visual and customizable charts directly on your Confluence pages.

TennisSlot plans timeslots for trainees

TennisSlot is an intelligent tennis training scheduling and group management platform designed for tennis clubs, tennis academies, and coaches. The software automates the time-consuming process of organizing training groups by matching players based on skill level, age, availability, and preferred training partners. Its optimization algorithm generates balanced training groups and efficient schedules in seconds, helping clubs reduce administrative workload and make better use of available coaching resources and training slots. Players can register through a dedicated link, submit their availability, and provide their training preferences. Club administrators can centrally manage players, coaches, and training slots, review automatically generated schedules, and make manual adjustments using an intuitive drag-and-drop interface. Once the schedule is finalized, personalized training information can be distributed to players via email or exported as PDF. Additional features include CSV import and export, configurable scheduling criteria, and partner preferences. TennisSlot replaces manual spreadsheets and complex coordination with a streamlined digital workflow, making tennis training organization faster, more transparent, and easier to manage for clubs of all sizes.

Average Rating: 5.0/5.0

Total Reviews: 1

thirds.ai

thirds.ai makes good-looking, on-brand images and PDFs from templates. You start from a designer-made template, your own words, HTML, or a picture, and add your logo, colours, and fonts. Then you make as many new files as you need, with new words, prices, and photos in each one. You can make them on the website, from ChatGPT or Claude through our connector, or through the API. Every file fits your brand, so you don't have to check each one. 1 credit makes 1 PDF or image. A file that fails costs nothing. You start free with 50 credits a month and no card.

Thisys

Thisys (pronounced THI-SYS) is an AI-powered platform for surveys, quizzes and feedback forms from Thisys Technologies Pty Ltd, an Australian company. It began as SurveyFace in 2012 and was relaunched as Thisys, rebuilt around AI. You describe what you need in plain English and Thisys drafts it for you to review. Or start from one of 570 editable templates across 30 industries. Collect by web link, email invitation with delivery tracking and automatic reminders, QR code or website embed, or put a tablet in kiosk mode. Analysis goes beyond a chart. Cross-tabulation with significance testing and weighting, automatic NPS scoring, themes across open-text answers, and an AI Decision Report: a verdict, the evidence behind it and recommended actions. The findings are computed from the data, and any AI sentence that contradicts them is left out. Reports export to PowerPoint, Word and PDF; responses export to CSV, Excel and SPSS. Quizzes mark themselves, with pass marks, partial credit, a gradebook, item analysis and certificates anyone can verify online. Protect finds tax file, Medicare and ABN numbers and card numbers using their checksums, and masks personal data on shared results. Consent records, retention windows and anonymous collection are built in. AI runs on one named provider, Anthropic Claude. It reads a survey's responses only once the owner allows it, and every AI output is a draft until you accept it. Free plan: unlimited surveys, all 19 question types and 1,000 answers a month. Pro is US$19 a month and Business is US$99 a month. Enterprise is custom, by conversation.