Zealous is not the only option for Awards Management Software. Explore other competing options and alternatives. Awards Management Software is a widely used technology, and many people are seeking quick, high quality software solutions with ad hoc reporting and automated responses. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to Zealous include customer service. The best overall Zealous alternative is Bloomerang CRM. Other similar apps like Zealous are Award Force, Benevity, Submittable, and InEvent. Zealous alternatives can be found in Awards Management Software but may also be in Grant Management Software or Scholarship Management Software.
Bloomerang CRM helps nonprofits raise more by turning donor data into deeper relationships. With a 360º view of every supporter, you can personalize outreach, boost retention, and unlock greater generosity—all in one intuitive, mission-driven platform.
Advanced cloud software for organizers of awards, employee recognition, grants, scholarships, pitch competitions and more to manage submission, evaluation and award of results, online.
Benevity is a platform for online workplace giving, volunteering and grant management programs.
InEvent is an end-to-end integrated platform for management, communication and interaction at events.
OpenWater is a cloud-based awards software platform designed to automate and help grow awards and recognition programs.
Instrumentl is designed to match nonprofits and researchers with relevant grants and help them manage their grants process.
Evalato (formerly part of the Weemss) is a next-gen submission and evaluation platform for awards, grants, applications, scholarships and other programs.
AwardSpring’s scholarship management platform is simple, powerful, and easy to use. Our thoughtful, intuitive design simplifies your application process and empowers you to focus on what really matters - less paperwork, more awarding.
SmarterSelect's totally online solution eliminates paper and the effort spent simply organizing paperwork and information, rather than evaluating the most deserving applicants.