# What are the most trusted Wastewater Pipeline Inspection solutions by Infrastructure Manager professionals based on user reviews?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I've been researching <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/wastewater-pipeline-inspection"><strong>wastewater pipeline inspection software</strong></a> specifically for infrastructure management teams, and one thing became clear quickly: infrastructure managers don't evaluate this category the way field crews or IT do. They're weighing asset lifecycle planning and long-term data continuity against day-to-day inspection mechanics, and most listings here haven't built up G2 reviewer volume yet, which made this harder to pin down than expected. Platforms that come up most when the question is framed around infrastructure management specifically: ITpipes, GraniteNet, and PipeLogix.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/itpipes/reviews"><strong>ITpipes</strong></a>: Built around asset management workflows rather than pure field capture, with native Esri ArcGIS mapping and two-way sync into systems like Cityworks, Cartegraph, and Maximo; the AI-assisted defect coding claims to cut coding time while holding NASSCO accuracy standards, though that comes from the vendor page since reviewer volume here is still building.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/granitenet/reviews"><strong>GraniteNet</strong></a>: From CUES, pairs inspection software with rugged CCTV and sonar equipment built for long-term field durability; infrastructure managers weighing total cost of ownership across a fleet's lifespan tend to look here first, even without independent reviewer commentary to confirm it yet.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ibak/reviews"><strong>IBAK</strong></a>: Positions itself around flexible sewer network applications rather than one fixed workflow, which matters for teams managing mixed pipe conditions across an aging network.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/pipelogix/reviews"><strong>PipeLogix</strong></a>: Built around collection and deliverable generation, PACP exports, and video player exports, with packages flexible enough to scale between a single truck and a full office deployment; that scalability is exactly what infrastructure managers juggling variable budgets across departments tend to ask about.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/pipe-insights/reviews"><strong>Pipe Insights</strong></a>: Differentiates by validating defects with AECOM's engineers rather than relying on software output alone, an angle that appeals to managers who need confidence in defect calls that feed into capital planning decisions.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For infrastructure managers who've actually run one of these against a capital planning cycle: did the asset management integration hold up once real budget decisions depended on it, or did the data still end up exported into a separate system anyway?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 15 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;For infrastructure managers, I’d put a lot of weight on how inspection data carries forward into asset planning. ITpipes’ connections with ArcGIS and asset management systems stand out for that reason, while Pipe Insights adds an interesting engineering-validation layer. When inspection findings start influencing rehabilitation priorities, having confidence in both the defect data and its history becomes incredibly valuable.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 15 days ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4