I use GitHub Copilot to help with coding basic things, formatting my code, and looking for errors. It's integrated into my IDE (VS Code), so I don't have to switch tabs. I appreciate that it comes with multiple LLM options like Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini, allowing me to switch as I wish. It doesn't run out of credits and has better code handling compared to the traditional web versions. I love that I don't have to copy and paste my code because it already has access and updates it itself. Before changing my code permanently, I can see how the new version performs and the changes it made before deciding to 'keep' it. The integration of multiple AIs helps me check what each has to offer before going with one. The setup was really easy; I just got the extension and connected my GitHub account, and I was good to go. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it takes too long to generate a response and keeps meddling with the terminal instead of the actual code, but that happens rarely. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I love most about GitHub Copilot is how effortlessly it supports my day-to-day automation work. The ease of use is what hooked me from day one; it genuinely feels like having a partner who already understands my coding style and our specific Java framework. I use it constantly throughout the day, and that frequency has actually changed how I approach writing new scripts. Instead of digging through documentation for Rest Assured syntax or Selenium locators, I can just start typing and it completes what I’m trying to do. It keeps me in the flow, making the whole process feel more natural and far less like a chore.

The implementation and integration have been big pluses for me as well. Since our codebase already lives in GitHub, getting it running in my IDE was basically a one-click setup. It didn’t require complicated configuration or major changes to how we work; it simply fit into our existing Git workflow. The range of features—especially the new agent mode—has also noticeably boosted our productivity. It’s not only about basic code completion anymore; it’s about having a tool that can help me think through more complex logic or even refactor an entire page object while I’m still in the middle of a sprint.

Whenever I’ve hit a strange glitch or had questions about recent updates, both customer support and the community have been really helpful. It’s reassuring to know the platform is well supported, especially since we rely on it so heavily for testing now. At this point, it’s become an essential part of my toolkit—I can’t really imagine going back to writing boilerplate code by hand or spending hours debugging simple typos that Copilot catches right away. It lets me focus more on the interesting parts of my job, like figuring out the best testing strategies for our products. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The context window can also be a bit frustrating. In our larger automation files—especially those with hundreds of lines of API test cases—Copilot sometimes loses track of the logic I established at the top of the file. It then starts suggesting variable names or logic that doesn’t align with the rest of the script, which forces me to pause and manually correct it. It’s not a dealbreaker, but it does interrupt my momentum. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The Copilot drastically increases my productivity by suggesting, in real-time, repetitive code blocks and even more complex logic. It's like having a constant partner in programming the projects at Jheytech.Ai. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes, the suggestions may be based on outdated libraries, which requires a more careful manual review. Additionally, the reliance on a stable internet connection can be a limiting factor.

What problems does it solve?: "It solves the time bottleneck in writing boilerplate code and helps to learn new syntaxes more quickly, which is essential for my study flow at Uniasselvi."

Evaluation Title: "The indispensable right-hand for developers in training" Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find GitHub Copilot incredibly easy to use, and I love how it integrates seamlessly with many of my editors like Visual Studio Code and IntelliJ. That's definitely a great point about it. It plays a very important role in my day-to-day activities by helping me reduce my workload and complete tasks much quicker. The tool assists me in understanding problem statements without even writing the code, generating code, analyzing different solutions to opt for the best, and even reviewing pull requests by just selecting Copilot as the reviewer. It also provides a chat box in my editor, which allows me to push code changes, commit my code, and create pull requests or feature branches with ease. From a security perspective, GitHub Copilot also stands out positively. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the models in GitHub Copilot hallucinate or they're not able to capture the context or maintain the history. If that can be improved, it would be great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GitHub Copilot has significantly improved my coding productivity. It suggests intelligent code completions and entire functions that often match what I was planning to write. Copilot excels at routine tasks like boilerplate setup, loops, and standard patterns, which saves me a lot of time and helps me focus on the more complex parts of development. It’s like having a second pair of hands in my editor — especially useful for jumpstarting new files or unfamiliar APIs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Context awareness: Sometimes suggestions don’t fully understand the bigger picture of the current project or custom business logic, leading to irrelevant code.

Accuracy in complex logic: For advanced architecture or deeply specific requirements, suggestions can miss the mark and require careful editing.

Security awareness: Occasionally suggests patterns that might not follow best security practices, so you must Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use GitHub Copilot to help me code, and it reviews my code during PRs. I like how it goes straight into solving my problems and understands what I'm asking. It gives me more than one answer, allowing me to decide what's best for my application. The initial setup was super easy; I just had to link my proxy and log in. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes I feel like GPT isn't as effective as Claude, so maybe allow all the AI Agents to be equally knowledgeable. I think it might be better if it doesn't just suggest downloading plugins and instead explains things before doing them. Sometimes it just goes straight into asking to download instead of explaining why this solution might be best for me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GitHub Copilot proves to be an amazing tool for coding activities of every day. The implementation is pretty straightforward, and it does not demand a complicated setup. The development environment's integration is significantly seamless and fast. Moreover, it provides handy code suggestions, eliminates duplication of work, and the like. In effect, it turns coding into an easier, quicker, and more pleasant experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One aspect of GitHub Copilot that I am not really fond of is its occasional provision of incorrect or partial code recommendations. It might be the case that it does not perfectly grasp the project environment and thus comes up with non-optimal solutions. I continue to be in a situation where I have to meticulously review and test the code, which means more effort on my side. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use GitHub Copilot regularly for college projects and personal development work in VS Code. It helps me write code faster by suggesting functions, logic, and boilerplate—especially in languages like Python, JavaScript, and Java. I find it particularly useful for repetitive tasks, API usage, and quick scaffolding, which saves me a lot of time during assignments and practice projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it provides inaccurate information, so we still have to manually verify everything before using it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GitHub Copilot is easy to set up and I like that it integrates with VS Code. It's functionality has improved significantly over the past year and it genuinely makes a lot of tasks easier. I'm a fan of using it for planning and reviewing complex work to help find possible issues early on. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lately I've been hitting something that feels like a rate limit when the agent stops, in I have to prompt it to keep going. I'm not certain if this is a bug or a feature. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like using GitHub Copilot for writing code faster, generating boilerplate code, creating Spring Boot APIs, React components, and suggesting SQL queries and unit test cases. It's very helpful in providing quick code suggestions while writing Java, Spring Boot, and React applications. I appreciate its ability to reduce manual effort by generating repetitive code and giving good recommendations for logic implementation. I love its smart code auto-completion, real-time suggestions in the IDE, and the ability to generate complete methods, classes, and boilerplate code. It stands out in helping with Spring Boot REST APIs, JPA repository queries, React components, and unit test cases. The best aspect is that it understands code context and quickly suggests optimized solutions, which saves significant development time and boosts productivity. I also enjoy the smooth integration with IntelliJ IDEA, where it delivers real-time code suggestions. The initial setup was smooth and user-friendly, making the onboarding process straightforward and quick. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes GitHub Copilot suggestions are not fully accurate for complex business logic and may generate code that needs manual validation. It can also suggest outdated or unnecessary code patterns, and occasionally, the recommendations are repetitive. For large projects, it may not always be possible to understand the complete application context, so developers still need to review security, performance, and coding standards before using the generated code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.