GitHub Copilot Reviews & Product Details

GitHub Copilot has significantly sped up my development workflow. Its inline code suggestions are accurate and context-aware, particularly when I’m working in C# and TypeScript. It takes care of repetitive boilerplate almost instantly, which saves me hours each week. The chat feature in VS Code is also excellent for explaining code, helping generate unit tests, and assisting with debugging when I get stuck. Overall, it integrates smoothly into my existing setup with virtually no friction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the suggestions feel off-context or overly verbose, so I still need to adjust them manually. It can also struggle at times with less common frameworks or niche libraries. The cost may be a barrier for solo developers or small teams. During heavy usage, it occasionally slows the editor down a bit, and the suggestions can start to feel repetitive when I’m working with similar code patterns across a project. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Developers do not have to leave their IDE to look up documentation or search Stack Overflow.

This helps to save time, brakes complex code for us to understand that easily. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it gives meaningless codes & sometimes wrong codes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Very helpful for coding. It’s useful for both code generation and editing, and it has increased my productivity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It hallucinates a little sometimes. I’m also unable to fetch the history from some previous sessions, and I keep seeing the same repetition again and again. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the integration in VSCode. Its performance while coding is pretty good. It used to be competitively priced, but they changed the pricing model, so it's no longer as inexpensive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

New pricing model - this completely ruined the experience Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it understand my intent means what im trying to build, what are the features ,where should data flow it gets me, its UI is actually user fiendly compared to most of AI Agents i know . it integration with mcp server makes work much easier like with figma,etc Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

costly and free tier ends very soon and context is also limited it should be which is a barrier in making full stak apps Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The usability is great and it fits naturally into my day-to-day coding. The suggestions are relevant and it performs well right out of the box, so I can rely on it for regular software development work without much setup or fuss. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly there isn't much I dislike. It's a solid tool, and while there's always some room to refine the suggestions and polish the experience, nothing major has gotten in the way of my day-to-day work so far. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most is how it fits into both my development workflow and our review process. I use it in my IDE to help write code, suggest improvements, and even debug when I’m stuck, which saves a lot of time. We also use it as part of an automated GitHub workflow for code reviews, and it’s helpful in catching basic issues or suggesting changes early. It feels like having an extra pair of eyes, especially for repetitive or boilerplate-heavy tasks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The suggestions aren’t always accurate, especially for more complex logic or domain-specific code. You still need to review everything carefully, as it can sometimes produce code that looks right but isn’t fully correct. In code reviews, it’s useful but not a replacement for human context, it can miss the bigger picture or intent behind changes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the interface and how easily i can use it in my IDE and let it explain my problem and it understands it easily and gives me accurate answers. Is interface is so easy for anyone to understand and start using right away. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It sometimes interrupts my work flow with some intrusive suggestions. Also if the session is too long then it starts hallucinating. It needs right prompt and we need to explain what we need or the answers would be very poor. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use GitHub Copilot to help with coding basic things, formatting my code, and looking for errors. It's integrated into my IDE (VS Code), so I don't have to switch tabs. I appreciate that it comes with multiple LLM options like Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini, allowing me to switch as I wish. It doesn't run out of credits and has better code handling compared to the traditional web versions. I love that I don't have to copy and paste my code because it already has access and updates it itself. Before changing my code permanently, I can see how the new version performs and the changes it made before deciding to 'keep' it. The integration of multiple AIs helps me check what each has to offer before going with one. The setup was really easy; I just got the extension and connected my GitHub account, and I was good to go. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it takes too long to generate a response and keeps meddling with the terminal instead of the actual code, but that happens rarely. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Integration within VsCode and ability to move the windows around and out of the VsCode window.

It's ability to perform multi-file edits with ease.

The clear mention of the pricing for each model, and model configuration.

The overall ability to make custom agents, and copy agent file to provide custom workflow instructions.

Ease to integrate and start with existing VsCode flow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lack of Grok models, specially the new Grok 4.5.

The listing of historical chats, and the inability to search through those. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.