The software effectively lightens agent workloads by providing answers to common questions, which is a practical benefit for teams. Nonetheless, its intelligence and reasoning capabilities may not match those of other AI tools on the market.
View Full ReviewFin Reviews (3,938)
Fin Reviews (3,938)
What do users say?
What I like most about Fin is the way it communicates. At times, it sounds very human, and that is a very positive point. I also believe that the Workflows are very good for solving many cases.
In daily life, it allows us to resolve many cases easily and quickly for the clients.
It has some integrations, like Notion, website, etc.
In terms of performance, it meets expectations well and there are few downtimes. The price is okay, but it could improve in terms of FinAI per resolution; we find it expensive.
Fin offers various trainings, and we can track the progress. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The part about Fin where we don't really know what is shared and what is co-shared. With Fin, and at a regulatory level, it is a bit difficult for us to use our databases and share them with Fin, because we don't know what is being shared and the security they have. We would like to know more about this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I like how easy it is to manage articles and especially like that I can see what conversations customers have opened while looking at a specific article. I also like being able to sync external sites into the knowledge-base, which I use for adding our changelog details into FIN. It's easy to correct FIN anytime it answers incorrectly and the stats and reports are good as well.
Support is also great - they are always friendly and helpful when you need to speak to someone. They obviously also use FIN for AI support and it resolves my issues most of the time, but the team jumps in normally same-day if the AI can't resolve it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Don't dislike much - sometimes the text editing in content is a little annoying, but there's nothing I can think of that I specifically dislike. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a daily user of Intercom, Fin Intercom has been a real game-changer thanks to its strong AI features. It’s a great AI support tool that helps the user rephrase a response based on the customer’s mood. This reduces my workload and also helps improve response time, making support feel smoother overall. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Nothing in particular to add. It works great when it’s paired with a well-maintained knowledge base and supported by human oversight. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Fin is that it actually does the job instead of just pretending to help.
A lot of AI chatbots sound impressive at first, but once you rely on them day to day, they either give vague answers or end up passing everything to a human. Fin feels different. It can genuinely handle real customer questions on its own, which takes a lot of pressure off the team.
I also appreciate that the responses don’t feel robotic. Because it pulls from your own help center and past data, the answers are usually relevant and make sense in context, so customers aren’t stuck reading generic replies.
And when a human handoff is needed, it’s smooth. It avoids that frustrating loop where the customer has to repeat everything all over again, which is a big plus.
Overall, it feels practical: not overhyped, not complicated—just something that actually helps reduce workload and improve response time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Nothing in particular, but it does sometimes have glitches. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Fin is genuinely one of the easier tools I've worked with when it comes to setup and day-to-day configuration. You don't need to be deeply technical to get it running or make adjustments — the interface is intuitive and it doesn't take long to get comfortable with it.
One thing that's kept me positive on it is how frequently Intercom ships new features. It doesn't feel stagnant — there's a real sense that the product is actively being worked on and improved. On top of that, the interactive sessions and webinars they host are actually useful. They're a good way to keep up with what's new and ask questions directly, which isn't something every vendor bothers to do well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The biggest frustration has been hallucinations — Fin will occasionally give answers that sound confident but aren't accurate, which is a real concern when customers are relying on it for correct information. It's not constant, but it happens enough to where you have to stay on top of it.
The other issue is that when you catch a bad answer, it's not always obvious what to actually change to fix it. Whether it's a content source issue, a guidance tweak, or something else — the path to correcting it isn't as clear as it could be. A bit more transparency into why Fin responded the way it did would go a long way. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the translation option. It has been so helpful with users writing in and having instant translations. We use FIN's macros and Help Center to store all of our information. It has also made reporting a breeze. We report on metrics monthly, and those numbers are compiled nicely in Intercom. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Our primary concern is that FIN workflows do not always perform as intended. We follow the instructions given, but we usually have to dig deeper to get FIN to respond the way we want it to. We have also received steps from FIN to find out that we do not have the level that feature is available to. That should be part of the information. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Fin is how effectively it automates customer support by providing fast, relevant answers based on existing knowledge base content. It significantly reduces response times and helps handle a large volume of repetitive queries without requiring constant human intervention. The integration with Intercom is seamless, and it’s easy to deploy and scale, which makes it a valuable tool for improving support efficiency. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
One downside is that the accuracy of responses heavily depends on the quality and structure of the knowledge base, which can require ongoing maintenance. In some cases, the AI may provide incomplete or slightly off responses, especially for more complex or edge-case queries Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like everything about Fin so far. It has been great for handling general troubleshooting, sales, district questions, software questions, tutorials, and how-tos in our customer support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I wish the custom answers feature could show pictures and videos, as we use a lot of those. Also, the Fin reports should be easier to read and interpret. The initial setup of Fin was super hard, which was quite challenging. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It’s easy to use thanks to the platform’s interface and its integration with Claude. The quality of the output is truly amazing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I’d like a better native connection to Claude, so it has more visibility and the right permissions for posting (internal policies, etc.). It would also help to be able to connect it to building custom workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Questions about Fin? Ask real users or explore answers from the community
Get practical answers, real workflows, and honest pros and cons from the G2 community or share your insights.

How are you handling Fin workflows when the native builder feels too limited?
What is the best way to deal with emails sent to your personal email and getting into the help desk?
Pricing Options
Pricing provided by Fin.


