Best Secure Code Review Software

How Many Secure Code Review Software Products Does G2 Track?

Total Products under this Category: 72

Category Stats (Nov 2026)

  • Average Rating: 4.53/5 (↑0.01 vs Oct 2026) The average rating of products in this category, based on all submitted ratings
  • Top Trending Product: Endor Labs (+0.46%) - Among all products in this category, Endor Labs recorded the largest rating increase compared to last month

Last updated: November 13, 2026

How Does G2 Rank Secure Code Review Software Products?

Why You Can Trust G2's Software Rankings:

  • 30 Analysts and Data Experts
  • 5,500+ Authentic Reviews
  • 72+ Products
  • Unbiased Rankings

G2's software rankings are built on verified user reviews, rigorous moderation, and a consistent research methodology maintained by a team of analysts and data experts. Each product is measured using the same transparent criteria, with no paid placement or vendor influence. While reviews reflect real user experiences, which can be subjective, they offer valuable insight into how software performs in the hands of professionals. Together, these inputs power the G2 Score, a standardized way to compare tools within every category.

G2 Grid® for Secure Code Review Software

G2 Grid® for Secure Code Review Software plotting products by satisfaction and market presence

Highlighted products: GitHub, Aikido Security, GitGuardian, SonarQube, GitLab, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Qodo, and Checkmarx.

Underlying data: [Grid® JSON](https://www.g2.com/categories/secure-code-review/grids.json?focus%5B%5D=github&focus%5B%5D=aikido-security&focus%5B%5D=gitguardian&focus%5B%5D=sonarqube&focus%5B%5D=gitlab&focus%5B%5D=microsoft-defender-for-cloud&focus%5B%5D=qodo&focus%5B%5D=checkmarx)

GitHub

GitHub is where the world builds software. Millions of individuals, organizations and businesses around the world use GitHub to discover, share, and contribute software. Developers at startups to Fortune 50 companies use GitHub, every step of the way.

Average Rating: 4.7/5.0

Total Reviews: 2,375

How Do G2 Users Rate GitHub?

  • Quality of Support: 8.7/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.9/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 9.0/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind GitHub?

  • Seller: GitHub
  • Year Founded: 2008
  • HQ Location: San Francisco, CA
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    6,653 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Who Uses This: Software Engineer, Senior Software Engineer
  • Top Industries: Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 47% Small, 31% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About GitHub?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users love the user-friendly interface of GitHub, enjoying seamless collaboration and efficient project management.
  • Users value the ease of use of GitHub, praising its intuitive interface and seamless collaboration features.
  • Users value the efficient team collaboration GitHub offers, streamlining workflows and enhancing project management.
  • Users value the smooth collaboration on GitHub, appreciating its all-in-one platform for managing projects and code.
  • Users appreciate how GitHub offers integrated version control, enhancing collaboration and workflow efficiency in development projects.
Cons
  • Users find the complexity of GitHub's features challenging, especially for new team members adapting to advanced workflows.
  • Users find the steep learning curve challenging, especially for advanced features and managing complex repositories.
  • Users find the difficulty for beginners in mastering advanced features and git commands to be quite challenging.
  • Users find the learning difficulty challenging, especially with advanced features and complex workflows for newcomers.
  • Users find the steep learning curve for advanced features challenging, especially for beginners navigating Git commands and workflows.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of GitHub?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About GitHub?

Aikido Security

Aikido Security is the developer-first security platform that unifies code, cloud, protection, and attack testing in one suite of best-in-class products. Built by developers for developers, Aikido helps teams of any size ship secure software faster, automate protection, and simulate real-world attacks with AI-driven precision. The platform’s proprietary AI cuts noise by 95%, delivers one-click fixes, and saves developers 10+ hours per week. Aikido Intel proactively uncovers vulnerabilities in open source packages before disclosure, helping secure more than 50,000 organizations worldwide, including Revolut, Niantic, Visma, Montblanc, and GoCardless.

Average Rating: 4.5/5.0

Total Reviews: 272

How Do G2 Users Rate Aikido Security?

  • Quality of Support: 9.3/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.3/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 9.4/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Aikido Security?

  • Seller: Aikido Security
  • Company Website:
  • Year Founded: 2022
  • HQ Location: Ghent, Belgium
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    320 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Who Uses This: Founder, CTO
  • Top Industries: Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 78% Small, 15% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Aikido Security?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users appreciate the ease of use of Aikido Security, thanks to its clear insights and seamless integration.
  • Users appreciate Aikido Security's robust security capabilities, providing a comprehensive and seamless integration in their workflow.
  • Users value the intuitive dashboard of Aikido Security, which simplifies security issue identification and management.
  • Users value the easy integrations of Aikido Security, enhancing workflows with seamless connections to existing GitLab repositories.
  • Users find Aikido's easy setup highly efficient, enabling quick implementation and immediate usability for security assessments.
Cons
  • Users note the lack of advanced features in Aikido Security, such as dark mode and in-depth analysis options.
  • Users find the pricing structure expensive for micro businesses, making upgrades difficult to justify.
  • Users note the limited features of Aikido Security, wishing for more customization and advanced options.
  • Users find the pricing issues challenging, especially for micro businesses, due to the steep upgrade costs.
  • Users feel Aikido Security is lacking features like advanced reporting and deeper compliance analysis compared to competitors.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Aikido Security?

GitGuardian

GitGuardian is the credential layer security platform for securing the secrets that let code, machines, and AI agents access systems and act as trusted identities. API keys, tokens, passwords, and other secrets carry real access. When they leak, attackers do not need to break in, they can log in. The scale of the problem keeps growing: 28.6 million new secrets were exposed on public GitHub in 2025, a 34% year-over-year increase and the largest jump on record. GitGuardian finds the secrets that matter across an organization's entire secrets surface, inside and outside the perimeter. Internal Secrets Monitoring detects hardcoded credentials across private repositories, CI/CD pipelines, container images, cloud configs, and collaboration tools like Slack, Jira, Confluence, and Google Drive, using 550+ detectors with live validity checks that confirm each secret is active before it hits your queue. Public Secrets Monitoring scans public GitHub (1B+ commits per year) and DockerHub in real time for corporate secrets exposed online. Developer Endpoint Protection extends coverage to the developer machine itself: config files, shell history, MCP configs, and files persisted by AI coding agents like Claude Code, Cursor, and Copilot. AI Hooks add runtime guardrails inside the agents, checking prompts before they are sent. For every secret it finds, GitGuardian reveals context and blast radius. NHI Governance supplies that identity layer, discovering every machine identity across repos, CI/CD, cloud, and collaboration tools, attributing ownership, scoring risk, helping configure rotation policies, and surfacing continuous compliance evidence for PCI-DSS v4.0, NYDFS, DORA, NIS 2, and NIST 800-53. The detection surfaces find what's leaking. The identity layer connects each leak back to who owns it and what it accesses. One closed loop, from a developer's laptop to public GitHub. Honeytokens alert teams the moment an attacker uses a decoy credential. Backed by a $50M Series C raised in February 2026 (Insight Partners, Quadrille Capital) and trusted by 600K+ developers, GitGuardian is the #1 most-installed security app on the GitHub Marketplace. Enterprises including ING, BASF, Datadog, Bouygues Telecom, Euronext, and Orange Business rely on the platform.

Average Rating: 4.8/5.0

Total Reviews: 306

How Do G2 Users Rate GitGuardian?

  • Quality of Support: 9.1/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.0/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 9.4/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind GitGuardian?

  • Seller: GitGuardian
  • Company Website:
  • Year Founded: 2017
  • HQ Location: Paris, Île-de-France
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    208 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Who Uses This: Software Engineer, Software Developer
  • Top Industries: Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 85% Small, 12% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About GitGuardian?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users value the instant alert notifications from GitGuardian, enabling quick detection and remediation of sensitive data issues.
  • Users value the real-time secret detection of GitGuardian, enhancing security seamlessly within their development workflows.
  • Users value the fast and accurate vulnerability detection of GitGuardian, which ensures code safety effortlessly.
  • Users value the easy Git integration of GitGuardian, enhancing security without disrupting their coding workflow.
  • Users commend GitGuardian for its high accuracy in secret detection, enhancing security without disrupting their workflow.
Cons
  • Users experience false positives with GitGuardian, necessitating manual reviews and slowing down the workflow.
  • Users find the inefficient notifications overwhelming due to volume, false positives, and cluttered incident navigation.
  • Users note the limited customization options in GitGuardian, which can affect alert management and overall configuration.
  • Users find the confusing interface complicates navigation and increases manual filtering time for multiple incident alerts.
  • Users find the difficulty for beginners in navigating alerts overwhelming, impacting their ability to assess real threats effectively.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of GitGuardian?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About GitGuardian?

AI can help you find the answers. G2 helps you trust them.

Connect G2 to Claude or ChatGPT for answers grounded in G2's trusted reviews, comparisons, and pricing from real user insights.

How it works
Connect G2 to ChatGPTConnect G2 to Claude

SonarQube

Sonar, the industry standard for code verification and automated code review, helps reduce outages, improve security, and lower risks associated with AI and agentic coding. As an independent verification platform, Sonar enables organizations to securely develop at the speed of AI. Sonar is the foundation for high-performance software engineering, analyzing over 750 billion lines of code daily to ensure applications are secure, reliable, and maintainable. Rooted in the open source community, Sonar is trusted by 7M+ developers globally, including teams at ServiceNow, Booking.com, Deutsche Bank, AstraZeneca, and Ford Motor Company.

Average Rating: 4.4/5.0

Total Reviews: 165

How Do G2 Users Rate SonarQube?

  • Quality of Support: 8.2/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.3/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 8.2/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind SonarQube?

  • Seller: Sonar
  • Company Website:
  • Year Founded: 2008
  • HQ Location: Geneva, Switzerland
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    1,041 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Who Uses This: Software Engineer, DevOps Engineer
  • Top Industries: Information Technology and Services, Computer Software
  • Company Size: 41% Large, 41% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About SonarQube?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users appreciate the high-quality code analysis from SonarQube, ensuring cleaner, more reliable, and maintainable code.
  • Users appreciate SonarQube's separation of new and old code, enhancing prioritization of findings and improving overall code quality.
  • Users appreciate the effective issue identification of SonarQube, which enhances code quality and facilitates timely resolutions.
  • Users appreciate the ease of use of SonarQube, highlighting its simple setup and seamless CI/CD integration.
  • Users appreciate the easy integrations of SonarQube with CI/CD workflows, enhancing overall code quality and efficiency.
Cons
  • Users often face software bugs in SonarQube, leading to confusion with false positives and complex error messages.
  • Users find the complex configuration of SonarQube challenging, especially with initial setup and rule tuning in large projects.
  • Users report experiencing false positives that necessitate extra time for manual review and adjustments.
  • Users find the configuration complexity of SonarQube challenging, particularly with large projects and excessive warnings.
  • Users find the initial setup and configuration complex, especially for large projects, requiring time and careful tuning.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of SonarQube?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About SonarQube?

GitLab

GitLab is the most comprehensive AI-Powered DevSecOps platform that enables software innovation by empowering development, security, and operations teams to build better software, faster. With GitLab, teams can create, deliver, and manage code quickly and continuously instead of managing disparate tools and scripts. GitLab helps your teams across the complete DevSecOps lifecycle, from developing, securing, and deploying software. What makes us truly different? - Flexibility: Consume as a service or manage your own deployment - Cloud-Agnostic: Deploy anywhere with no vendor lock-in - No rip and replace: Scale to a platform approach at your own pace

Average Rating: 4.5/5.0

Total Reviews: 888

How Do G2 Users Rate GitLab?

  • Quality of Support: 8.5/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.9/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 8.7/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind GitLab?

  • Seller: GitLab Inc.
  • Year Founded: 2014
  • HQ Location: San Francisco, California
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    3,431 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Who Uses This: Software Engineer, Senior Software Engineer
  • Top Industries: Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 37% Medium, 37% Small

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About GitLab?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users value the ease of use in GitLab, appreciating its intuitive interface and straightforward setup for seamless collaboration.
  • Users appreciate the powerful all-in-one functionalities of GitLab that enhance collaboration and streamline development workflows.
  • Users value GitLab's integrated CI/CD feature, enhancing collaboration and streamlining code management seamlessly.
  • Users value the integrated CI/CD in GitLab, enhancing workflow efficiency and collaboration seamlessly.
  • Users value the seamless integration of GitLab with security tools, enhancing workflow efficiency and convenience.
Cons
  • Users find the complexity of the interface challenging, especially with large projects and advanced features being tiered.
  • Users find the difficult learning curve challenging, particularly when adapting to GitLab's complex features and structure.
  • Users often find the confusing interface of GitLab challenging, especially when navigating its extensive features and settings.
  • Users find the complex user interface challenging, especially with large projects, affecting performance and usability.
  • Users find the learning curve steep when adapting to GitLab's many features and unique group structures.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of GitLab?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About GitLab?

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a cloud native application protection platform for multicloud and hybrid environments with comprehensive security across the full lifecycle, from development to runtime.

Average Rating: 4.4/5.0

Total Reviews: 433

How Do G2 Users Rate Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

  • Quality of Support: 8.5/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.6/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 8.5/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

  • Seller: Microsoft
  • Year Founded: 1975
  • HQ Location: Redmond, Washington
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    232,750 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Ownership: MSFT
  • Phone: +1 (877) 276-2464

Who Uses This Product?

  • Who Uses This: Saas Consultant, Software Engineer
  • Top Industries: Information Technology and Services, Computer & Network Security
  • Company Size: 38% Medium, 35% Large

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users appreciate the proactive security of Microsoft Defender for Cloud, ensuring peace of mind against potential threats and malware.
  • Users emphasize the comprehensive security of Microsoft Defender for Cloud, appreciating its proactive threat protection and ease of use.
  • Users appreciate the ease of use and real-time threat notifications of Microsoft Defender for Cloud, enhancing workflow efficiency.
  • Users appreciate the real-time vulnerability detection of Microsoft Defender for Cloud, enhancing their security and workflow efficiency.
  • Users value the real-time threat detection of Microsoft Defender for Cloud, ensuring robust security and peace of mind.
Cons
  • Users find the pricing complexity and overwhelming features of Microsoft Defender for Cloud challenging to navigate effectively.
  • Users note that the pricing can be expensive, especially for small to medium businesses, causing potential budgeting issues.
  • Users express frustration with delayed detection of threats, complicating their security management and response efforts.
  • Users experience false positive alerts with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, complicating the detection of real threats.
  • Users express frustration over the complex licensing structure of Microsoft Defender for Cloud, leading to confusion and unexpected costs.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

Qodo

Qodo is the AI Code Quality and Governance Platform that helps engineering teams maintain code quality as AI accelerates coding velocity. Qodo works across IDEs and Git platforms to catch bugs earlier, enforce standards automatically, and scale review to match faster coding output. Qodo combines deep codebase understanding with a self-learning rules system and multi-agent review to validate code logic, detect architectural drift, surface security issues, and enforce standards before merge. Qodo goes beyond pattern matching or static AI reviews by combining full codebase context, PR memory, and your rules to deliver high-signal feedback that aligns with your project's unique architecture and standards. Key capabilities include agentic pull request review with context-enriched code suggestions, local code review in your IDE, custom rules enforcement, and multi-repo codebase indexing.

Average Rating: 4.5/5.0

Total Reviews: 121

How Do G2 Users Rate Qodo?

  • Quality of Support: 8.6/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.4/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 9.0/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Qodo?

  • Seller: CodiumAI
  • Company Website:
  • Year Founded: 2022
  • HQ Location: Tel Aviv, IL
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    146 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Who Uses This: Software Engineer
  • Top Industries: Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 61% Small, 25% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Qodo?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users appreciate the ease of use of Qodo, seamlessly integrating with their workflow and enhancing productivity.
  • Users appreciate Qodo's context-aware code reviews, providing valuable insights and suggestions that enhance efficiency and learning.
  • Users find Qodo to be a significant time-saver, enhancing collaboration and accelerating their development processes.
  • Users find Qodo to be a helpful coding assistant, offering context-aware suggestions that enhance the coding experience.
  • Users love the automation in Qodo, benefiting from swift unit test generation and seamless integration into coding routines.
Cons
  • Users experience slow performance with Qodo, leading to frustration and wasted time due to frequent crashes and lag.
  • Users find the steep learning curve of Qodo challenging, requiring significant time and effort to master its features.
  • Users encounter testing issues with Qodo, often requiring manual adjustments for generated unit tests to function properly.
  • Users experience occasional bug issues with Qodo, such as inaccurate suggestions and inconsistent command functionality.
  • Users feel the UI design is confusing, making it difficult to stay focused and find desired features.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Qodo?

Checkmarx

Checkmarx exists so the world can innovate faster than it ever has and still trust what it builds. That purpose starts with closing the Risk Gap — the widening distance between how fast software gets created and how fast risk can be understood and removed. As AI compresses the software development lifecycle from months to minutes, the old model of shipping code with known vulnerabilities and racing to patch it before attackers strike no longer works. Checkmarx's foundation: decades of deterministic threat intelligence and trillions of lines of code scanned each year. The Checkmarx One platform gives enterprises comprehensive application security, built to capture risk, eliminate vulnerabilities, and unify governance. Checkmarx Fusion now pairs that foundation with Claude-powered AI reasoning, unifying both engines to lead the category in detection accuracy. From there, the Checkmarx Assist family — Developer Assist, Triage Assist, and Remediation Assist — prevents vulnerabilities at the point of creation, prioritizes findings by real-world attackability, and generates review-ready fixes, so nothing sits in backlog waiting on a human to catch up. Checkmarx keeps detection and remediation independent. Instead of having the same system that writes the code grade its own work, security teams get oversight they can trust. This is the promise at the center of the mission: developers and agents never have to become security experts, and security leaders never have to take security on faith so enterprises can innovate at machine speed without ever trading speed for certainty.

Average Rating: 4.2/5.0

Total Reviews: 47

How Do G2 Users Rate Checkmarx?

  • Quality of Support: 8.4/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.7/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 8.2/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Checkmarx?

  • Seller: Checkmarx
  • Company Website:
  • Year Founded: 2006
  • HQ Location: Paramus, NJ
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    997 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Information Technology and Services, Computer Software
  • Company Size: 55% Large, 24% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Checkmarx?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users find Checkmarx easy to implement into existing repositories, appreciating its user-friendly interface and comprehensive features.
  • Users appreciate the intuitive user interface of Checkmarx, making security reviews straightforward and user-friendly.
  • Users value the accuracy of results from Checkmarx, noting its effective code review and user-friendly interface.
  • Users appreciate the automation of security reviews in Checkmarx, praising its ease of implementation and user-friendly interface.
  • Users commend Checkmarx for its excellent customer support, consistently available to assist with any issues that arise.
Cons
  • Users experience a high number of false positives with Checkmarx, especially when analyzing Kotlin based projects.
  • Users are frustrated with Checkmarx's poor feature support for Kotlin, leading to numerous false positives in scans.
  • Users note a significant issue with false positives in Kotlin support, affecting their experience when using Checkmarx.
  • Users feel that the poor navigation in Checkmarx hinders their ability to efficiently use the dashboards.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Checkmarx?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About Checkmarx?

Semgrep

Semgrep is a modern static analysis (SAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and secrets detection platform designed for both developers and security teams. It combines fast, deterministic analysis with context-aware AI that triages findings like a senior security engineer. The AI Assistant helps reduce false positives, prioritize meaningful results, and offers clear remediation guidance. Its “Memories” feature learns from past decisions to further reduce triage noise over time. Semgrep also supports deep analysis of transitive dependencies, not just direct ones, helping teams surface and address hidden risks in their supply chain. It integrates well into modern development workflows and is easy to customize across environments.

Average Rating: 4.6/5.0

Total Reviews: 56

How Do G2 Users Rate Semgrep?

  • Quality of Support: 8.8/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.6/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 9.4/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Semgrep?

  • Seller: Semgrep
  • Year Founded: 2017
  • HQ Location: San Francisco, US
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    265 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Information Technology and Services, Computer Software
  • Company Size: 45% Large, 43% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Semgrep?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users appreciate the ease of use of Semgrep, enabled by its intuitive syntax and smooth integration with CI/CD.
  • Users appreciate the flexibility and speed of Semgrep in enforcing coding standards and catching vulnerabilities effectively.
  • Users appreciate the effective vulnerability detection of Semgrep, facilitating quick identification and resolution of security issues.
  • Users appreciate the scanning efficiency of Semgrep, benefiting from rapid scans and streamlined CI/CD integration.
  • Users value Semgrep for its effective security vulnerability detection, enabling quick resolutions without hindering development speed.
Cons
  • Users find Semgrep not user-friendly due to a steep learning curve and complex initial setup requirements.
  • Users find the limited features of Semgrep restrict its usability and complicate effective vulnerability management.
  • Users find the difficult learning curve for Semgrep daunting, especially for creating advanced rules and setups.
  • Users express concerns about the lack of guidance in creating custom rules, complicating effective use of Semgrep.
  • Users note a steep learning curve for Semgrep's rule syntax, making it challenging for newcomers to master.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Semgrep?

DryRun Security

Security leaders face a paradox: ship faster and enable agentic development while staying secure and keeping developers productive. DryRun Security resolves this by securing every pull request and repo with a high-precision, automated security engineer review right where developers and their agents build. DryRun Security is the industry’s most accurate agentic code security intelligence platform. Powered by its proprietary Contextual Security Analysis (CSA) engine, DryRun Security delivers the AI moment for security teams in an AI-native developer world. Traditional static application security testing (SAST) floods teams with alerts, misses higher-order risk, and burns time in triage. DryRun Security goes beyond SAST with contextual analysis that prioritizes what is exploitable and impactful in your codebase, then helps engineers remediate fast. Instead of “find everything and hope someone sorts it out,” DryRun Security delivers code security intelligence that is ready to act on. DryRun Security puts a security engineer directly into developer workflows. In pull requests, the Code Review Agent reviews changes in context, explains risk in plain language, and guides fixes where developers already work. In repos, the DeepScan Agent produces focused, human-grade findings for the issues that actually matter, without weeks of manual review before major milestones. The Custom Policy Agent enforces guardrails with Natural Language Code Policies, so you can standardize security and compliance requirements across teams without brittle rule sets. Codebase Insights allows leaders to ask questions of their entire codebase like "Are we exposed to this new vulnerability" and have confidence in minutes. DryRun Security also integrates with AI coding workflows, so remediation happens with the precision of a security engineer working at machine speed. Teams connect DryRun Security insights and guidance into Claude, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, and Windsurf, helping developers and their agents fix issues with contextual, security-engineered direction tied to the PR and codebase. What DryRun Security delivers (beyond SAST) • Automated secure code review in every pull request with high-signal findings and low noise • Contextual Security Analysis that catches common vulnerabilities and deeper multi-dependency and logic risks • Automated remediation guidance that helps engineers fix faster, with explanations and next steps • Secrets analysis identifies genuine hardcoded secrets and suppresses the usual false alarms • Policy enforcement in PRs using Natural Language Code Policies for consistent guardrails across repos • Codebase intelligence and reporting for AppSec visibility, prioritization, and audit-ready evidence DryRun Security supports most code environments, languages, and frameworks, including: • GitHub, GitLab • C#, Golang, Elixir, JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Ruby, Java, Kotlin, PHP, Swift, HTML • Infrastructure as Code (Terraform, YAML) • And more

Average Rating: 4.9/5.0

Total Reviews: 23

How Do G2 Users Rate DryRun Security?

  • Quality of Support: 10.0/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 10.0/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 10.0/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind DryRun Security?

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Computer & Network Security, Computer Software
  • Company Size: 43% Small, 30% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About DryRun Security?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users value the context-aware security insights of DryRun Security, enabling effective vulnerability mitigation during code reviews.
  • Users value the context-aware vulnerability detection of DryRun Security, which reduces false positives and enhances trust with developers.
  • Users value the contextual intelligence of DryRun Security, enhancing code security and early issue detection in development.
  • Users value the accuracy of DryRun Security, as it reduces false positives and enhances code security insights.
  • Users value the easy setup of DryRun Security, enabling quick integration and automated scanning for better security.
Cons
  • Users experience slow performance in the management portal, with noticeable lag during UI interactions and loading times.
  • Users find the slow speed of the management portal frustrating, impacting their overall experience and efficiency.
  • Users note a need for better UX focus in DryRun Security to enhance developer engagement and workflow integration.
  • Users desire more customization options for tuning analyzers to enhance their experience with DryRun Security.
  • Users believe there are workflow issues that could be improved to enhance overall developer experience and adoption.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of DryRun Security?

OX Security

OX rewires your security program for the Mythos Age: the era where AI writes the code, chains the exploits, and moves faster than human-built defenses can track. OX is an AI Native Application Protection Platform (AINAPP) unifying security from Prompt to Runtime. It moves your control surface upstream to the prompt, preventing and governing risk at the source instead of chasing it downstream in runtime. OX Mind and OX AI Context Lake connect AI-user governance, code security, cloud and runtime enforcement, and agentic pentesting into one system that shares context across the entire Agentic Development Lifecycle (ADLC), replacing fragmented point tools with a single platform. The platform runs on four connected pillars: OX VibeSec: Prevents unsafe AI decisions at the point of creation and governs every AI user in the organization, not just developers using coding assistants. Full visibility into which agents, MCPs, skills, and packages run, with what permissions, against what data. OX Code: Separates exploitable risk from theoretical noise using evidence from your actual deployment, threat model, and threat intelligence. OX Cloud: Prevents misconfigurations and enforces runtime boundaries that code and agents cannot cross, watching what actually runs in production. OX Agentic Pentester: Continuously simulates adversarial agent behavior to prove exploit paths back to their exact source, feeding what it finds back into OX VibeSec to sharpen governance. OX connects to your existing stack and traces every finding back to its origin (the prompt, the AI user, or the endpoint that created it), then fixes issues at the source rather than flagging them after the fact. For new deployments, OX consolidates governance, code security, cloud enforcement, and pentesting into one platform. For existing stacks, OX layers governance on top and makes current tools smarter through continuous learning, so the same issue never gets created twice. Visit https://ox.security for more information.

Average Rating: 4.8/5.0

Total Reviews: 51

How Do G2 Users Rate OX Security?

  • Quality of Support: 9.6/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.7/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 9.0/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind OX Security?

Who Uses This Product?

  • Who Uses This: Security Engineer
  • Top Industries: Financial Services, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 63% Medium, 25% Large

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About OX Security?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users appreciate the seamless integration and comprehensive features of OX Security, enhancing efficiency and issue management.
  • Users appreciate the ease of use of OX Security, highlighting its user-friendly interface and quick setup.
  • Users commend the great support team from OX Security, enhancing their overall experience and success.
  • Users value the seamless integration with existing tools, enhancing security without disrupting workflows or creating bottlenecks.
  • Users value the comprehensive security capabilities of OX Security, enhancing their organization's security posture effectively.
Cons
  • Users experience integration issues with OX Security, citing incomplete documentation and limited functionality in certain areas.
  • Users note the missing features in OX Security, impacting usability and integration with certain platforms and systems.
  • Users find OX Security's complexity overwhelming, with a steep learning curve and inadequate documentation frustrating the experience.
  • Users find the inadequate reporting in OX Security limits their ability to showcase security progress effectively.
  • Users note the limited cloud integration with tools like Azure DevOps, affecting ease of use and accessibility.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of OX Security?

Greptile

Greptile is an AI code reviewer that helps software teams catch bugs before merge. It reviews and tests pull requests with full codebase context, providing independent validation for code written by developers and coding agents. Its knowledge base tracks architecture, conventions and past bugs, helping reviews identify issues beyond the changed code. Coding agents can access the same knowledge through Greptile’s Knowledge Base MCP to follow existing patterns and avoid repeating known mistakes. Teams can define review rules in plain English and connect Jira, Linear and Notion for requirements and project context. Greptile learns from engineers’ PR comments and feedback so reviews reflect the team’s standards. Teams can choose Base, Plus or Apex reviews, or let Greptile select the depth based on each PR’s size, risk and complexity. TREX adds end-to-end testing by running the app in a configured sandbox and exercising the flows a change affects. It posts findings with video recordings so developers can see what happened. Security review combines static scanning and dependency checks with an AI security agent. Developers can use Greptile MCP to pull review findings into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex or Devin and implement fixes. They can also use the Greptile CLI to review local branches before pushing code or opening a pull request. Try Greptile on your next pull request with a 14-day free trial.

Average Rating: 4.0/5.0

Total Reviews: 27

How Do G2 Users Rate Greptile?

  • Quality of Support: 7.8/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.0/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 8.3/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Greptile?

  • Seller: Greptile
  • Company Website:
  • Year Founded: 2024
  • HQ Location: San Francisco, California, United States
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    39 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 74% Small, 26% Medium

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Greptile?

Black Duck Polaris Platform

Black Duck builds trust in software by enabling organizations to manage application security, quality, and compliance risks at the speed their business demands. Black Duck solutions help developers to secure code as fast as they write it, development and DevSecOps teams to automate testing within development pipelines without compromising velocity, and security teams to proactively manage risk and focus remediation efforts on what matters most. With Black Duck, organizations can transform the way they build and deliver software, aligning people, processes, and technology to intelligently address software risks across their portfolio and at all stages of the application lifecycle.

Average Rating: 4.2/5.0

Total Reviews: 103

How Do G2 Users Rate Black Duck Polaris Platform?

  • Quality of Support: 8.5/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.4/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 8.4/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Black Duck Polaris Platform?

  • Seller: Black Duck
  • Year Founded: 2024
  • HQ Location: Burlington, US
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    1,317 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Information Technology and Services, Computer Software
  • Company Size: 53% Large, 32% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Black Duck Polaris Platform?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users commend the accuracy of findings in Black Duck Polaris, especially its powerful engine for identifying open source issues.
  • Users praise the powerful open source issue identification by Black Duck Polaris, benefiting from extensive Black Duck Knowledge.
Cons
  • Users note that the platform requires huge resource constraints for on-prem deployment, impacting its usability.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Black Duck Polaris Platform?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About Black Duck Polaris Platform?

Assembla

Assembla is the only managed cloud hosting provider for Perforce (Helix Core) and SVN, with project management built in. We provision, manage, and support your entire version control infrastructure so your team never has to touch a server. Teams running Perforce or SVN in the cloud come to Assembla because we are the only provider that handles everything: dedicated instances, automated backups, failovers, SOC 2 and GDPR compliance, and 24/5 DevOps support. No self-managed infrastructure. No custom integrations. No DevOps overhead. Perforce Cloud delivers managed Helix Core hosting on a shared, high-performance cloud environment with monthly licensing and the Perforce license included. Perforce Enterprise Cloud gives larger teams a dedicated single-tenant instance with custom architecture and unlimited users and storage. SVN Cloud Hosting brings the same managed approach to Subversion, with modern collaboration features like merge requests, locking, and code search that most SVN providers do not offer. More than 5,500 development teams worldwide trust Assembla to keep their most critical code available, secure, and compliant.

Average Rating: 4.2/5.0

Total Reviews: 146

How Do G2 Users Rate Assembla?

  • Quality of Support: 8.4/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 8.3/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 8.8/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Assembla?

  • Seller: Assembla
  • Year Founded: 2005
  • HQ Location: San Antonio, TX
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    21 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Who Uses This: Software Engineer, Product Manager
  • Top Industries: Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  • Company Size: 51% Small, 40% Medium

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Assembla?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About Assembla?

Jit

Jit is redefining application security by introducing the first Agentic AppSec Platform, seamlessly blending human expertise with AI-driven automation. Designed for modern development teams, Jit empowers organizations to proactively manage security risks across the entire software development lifecycle.​ AI-Powered Agents Jit's AI Agents, such as SERA (Security Evaluation and Remediation Agent) and COTA (Communication, Ops, and Ticketing Agent), collaborate with your teams to automate vulnerability triage, risk assessment, and remediation processes, significantly reducing manual workloads. ​ Comprehensive Security Scanning Achieve full-stack security coverage with integrated scanners for SAST, DAST, SCA, IaC, CSPM, and more. Jit's platform ensures continuous monitoring and immediate feedback on code changes, facilitating rapid identification and resolution of security issues. ​ Developer-Centric Experience With integrations into popular IDEs and CI/CD pipelines, Jit provides developers with contextual security insights directly within their workflows, promoting a shift-left approach without disrupting productivity. ​ Agentic AI for AppSec Teams Risk-Based Prioritization Utilizing the Model Context Protocol (MCP), Jit evaluates vulnerabilities in the context of runtime environments, business impact, and compliance requirements, enabling teams to focus on the most critical risks. ​ Seamless Integrations Jit integrates with a wide array of tools, including GitHub, GitLab, AWS, Azure, GCP, Jira, Slack, and more, ensuring that security processes are embedded within your existing technology stack. ​

Average Rating: 4.5/5.0

Total Reviews: 43

How Do G2 Users Rate Jit?

  • Quality of Support: 9.3/10 (Category avg: 9.2/10)
  • Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.6/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
  • Ease of Setup: 9.2/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Jit?

  • Seller: jit
  • Year Founded: 2021
  • HQ Location: Boston, MA
  • LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
    161 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

  • Top Industries: Computer Software, Financial Services
  • Company Size: 44% Medium, 42% Small

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Jit?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros
  • Users appreciate the automated and lightweight security controls of Jit, enhancing workflows without adding complexity.
  • Users praise the easy integrations of Jit, which streamline security management within existing development workflows effortlessly.
  • Users value the ease of use of Jit, enjoying seamless integration and simplified management within their workflows.
  • Users value the efficiency of Jit, streamlining workflows and reducing excess with lightweight, automated security controls.
  • Users appreciate the seamless integration support of Jit, enhancing their development workflow without added complexity.
Cons
  • Users face integration issues with Jit, as it lacks comprehensive support for all enterprise environments and tools.
  • Users find the limited features of Jit hinder integrations and onboarding, affecting complex environments and documentation quality.
  • Users experience limited integration capabilities with Jit, particularly for advanced configurations and third-party tools.
  • Users frequently find the documentation lacking, particularly for advanced configurations and integrations with third-party tools.
  • Users find the complexity of Jit overwhelming, particularly with advanced integrations and configuration for beginners.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Jit?

Adam Crivello
AC
Researched and written by Adam Crivello
Updated October 3, 2024