I use Qodo for AI-powered code reviews and it solves the problem of slow and inconsistent code reviews. What I like most about Qodo is that it actually understands the context of the code. It doesn’t just flag surface-level issues it actually understands what the code is trying to do, providing useful and actionable suggestions. Features like in-IDE feedback and automated test suggestions fit naturally into my workflow, helping to catch issues early without slowing me down. It feels more like a helpful coding assistant than a tool that constantly interrupts my work. The initial setup was very easy, as Qodo integrated smoothly with our IDE and Git workflow, allowing us to start using it almost immediately without any complex configuration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Qodo works really well most of the time, but it's not perfect. For more complex or niche code scenarios, the suggestions can occasionally miss the mark and still require a manual review. I've also noticed that some generated unit tests need minor adjustments before they run correctly. These aren't major issues, but improving accuracy in edge cases and test generation would make the experience even better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
This review contains authentic analysis and has been reviewed by our team
This reviewer was offered a nominal incentive as thanks for completing this review.
Organic review. This reviewer was offered a nominal incentive as thanks for completing this review.


