What I like best about Asana is how effectively it brings structure and visibility to cross-functional work. As someone working closely with Sales Ops, Marketing Ops, and Tech Ops, Asana helps me break down complex, ongoing initiatives into clear projects, tasks, owners, and timelines.

The flexibility of Asana is a big plus — I can use it both for long-term operational projects and day-to-day BAU requests. Features like custom fields, rules, and forms make it easy to standardize intake, prioritize work, and ensure nothing falls through the cracks. It has significantly reduced follow-ups and ad-hoc communication by giving all stakeholders a single source of truth.

Overall, Asana has improved accountability, transparency, and execution across teams, especially in fast-moving operational environments Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While Asana is very strong for internal project and task management, it can feel limited when used for request or ticket-style workflows. Features like native SLA tracking, automatic acknowledgements, and ticket IDs are not built in, which means teams need to rely on workarounds using rules, custom fields, or integrations.

Additionally, managing requests coming in via email alongside form submissions can sometimes feel fragmented, especially for operational teams handling high volumes. More robust reporting around ageing tasks and SLA breaches would also be helpful for operational oversight.

That said, these are manageable gaps for many teams, and Asana continues to work well as a flexible and collaborative platform when combined with clear processes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Task and subtask setup is what hooked me. I can break down a project into smaller pieces, assign them out, set due dates, and then actually forget about following up because the platform handles that nudging for me. The automations are genuinely useful, not just a feature that sounds good in a demo. I use them to move tasks along based on status changes and it has cut down on a lot of back and forth. The timeline view also helps a lot when I need to see how everything stacks up across a given week or month without digging through a list. Integration with Google Drive was easy to set up and I use it constantly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Search function is not great. If I need to find a task from a few weeks back and I do not remember exactly what it was called or which project it lived in, it can take a while to track it down. For a platform that is supposed to reduce chaos, having a weak search kind of works against that. I know the AI feature is supposed to help with this and it does a little, but it still feels like something that should work better out of the box at this point. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Asana is easy to understand and get started with. The automations and tools are very powerful, and it honestly feels like our team hasn’t even scratched the surface yet. There’s still a lot more we can do with it, but it already helps our marketing team stay organized inside our team and with outside contractors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing at the moment. I do really appreciate that Asana connects with so many of our other marketing tools, like Claude and Google suite. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Asana has been very helpful for our team. We’ve been using it for the past three years, and it has made our work much easier overall. Collaboration between team members is smoother, and ticket management is also far more manageable.

Asana integrates well with tools our teams already use, helping keep project updates, communication, and reporting connected in one place. This reduces context switching and improves overall efficiency.

Performance has been reliable even when managing large projects with multiple stakeholders. Pages load quickly, updates are reflected in real time, and the platform remains responsive during day-to-day use.

The value provided by Asana outweighs the cost. Improved visibility, automation, and project tracking have reduced manual coordination efforts and helped teams save time while delivering work more efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Overall, I had a positive experience with Asana. The main area for improvement would be reducing the learning curve for new users, since some advanced features take time to understand and can feel overwhelming at first. However, once you get the hang of Asana, I think it makes life much easier for managing every task, project, ticket, and more. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Asana as a Work Management Platform to map out our day-to-day tasks into larger projects and broader team portfolios. It solves the problem of scattered communication and lack of accountability by centralizing everything, eliminating confusion, and making it clear who owns each task and how it connects to the broader project timeline. I love the highly visual and intuitive user interface, and being able to switch between List, Kanban Board, and Timeline views makes tracking project progress incredibly simple. It feels modern and clean, which helps with quick team adoption. It's so easy to set up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The platform can have a steep learning curve for new users due to the extensive features. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like Asana all right, especially now that I've gotten past the hard learning curve. I appreciate that it has not just checklists but also a board view. Asana's board view makes it pretty similar to Trello, which is important to me as a visual kinetic learner because drag and drop functionality is crucial. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's too complicated for what it is. You shouldn't need to go consult a YouTube video or dig through endless documentation just to figure out how to create a new tag, for example. It just needs to function more simply. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like Asana's connection with MCP and how easy it is to use overall. I also appreciate its ability to create intelligent workflows and its connectivity with other platforms like Make, which greatly helps me in creating my own tools. Additionally, the integration with MCP from Calude has allowed me to quickly create boards and workflows, significantly increasing the use of Asana. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For me, what doesn't work so well at the moment are the documents, because Asana only creates documents and not folders, which means it lacks strong organization, preventing us from including different types of notes. I would also like them to connect much better to meeting recording systems to keep track of all my tasks more easily with what is said in meetings. And I would also like them to have a much better connection with Google Chat, which is the main platform we use to communicate. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It brings together all the individual tasks each of our team members has into one platform, which helps us work more seamlessly and efficiently. It’s also really useful for quickly finding past conversations and locating shared files when we need them. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The system layout matches how our team already works, so it’s easy for everyone to stay on the same page. We can also bring in other people from our company to collaborate, and it’s straightforward for them to pick up quickly. It’s flexible too, so we can adapt it to different project structures without having to force a single approach. Overall, it’s easy to train people on and to bring them into our workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Asana is how it makes it easy to organize and track work in a clear, visual way that keeps teams aligned without needing constant check-ins. Its UI is intuitive with multiple views like lists and boards, integrations with tools like Slack and Google Workspace are smooth, and performance is generally fast and reliable even with larger projects. It offers strong ROI for teams managing complex workflows since it reduces missed tasks and improves accountability, onboarding is straightforward with helpful templates and guidance, and its AI features add value by helping summarize tasks and streamline planning. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about Asana is that it can feel overwhelming at first because of the number of features and views, and some advanced capabilities are locked behind higher pricing tiers. While it’s powerful, it can also become cluttered if teams don’t maintain structure, and its AI features are still somewhat limited compared to more specialized tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Asana easy to use and intuitive, which is great for our startup as we're a lean team and not highly technical. I appreciate that I can engage with Asana via Claude. We rely on Slack and Claude as key integrations, which enhance our task management. It's pretty easy to set up and helps with task management and prioritization, allowing us to manage sprints and keep track of what everyone is working on. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would like more online tools to help us run standard agile ceremonies without having to build external spreadsheets. We are not agile experts nor do we want to spend time learning all about the methods. We would value having leading practice methods built into Asana to help us operate at a level of high performance, like team capacity management and capturing sprint goals. Also, I would have liked the re-onboarding process to be better after having a prior instance with an old team member. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.