# Best VR simulators for equipment training and procedure rehearsal

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For training programs built around hands-on skills, walking through equipment or a process step by step in a safe, repeatable environment, a few <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/vr-training-simulator">VR Training Simulator</a> platforms have real evidence behind them.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/facilitate-com-facilitate/reviews">Facilitate</a> (4.8★, 11 reviews) comes up specifically for "process refreshers," walking learners through using a piece of equipment again after their initial induction, without needing a technical team to build it. Reviewers across colleges and enterprise L&amp;D teams describe it as no-code and quick to author in, with the main limitation being spotty WiFi on large campuses during creation.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/warp-vr/reviews">Warp VR</a> (4.8★, 41 reviews) is built around realistic 360° scenarios for safety and process training, with reviewers specifically citing it replacing costly or risky on-site sessions for procedure practice. It runs across headsets, tablets, and browsers, though 360 video makes editing long scenarios slower and needs decent hardware to run smoothly.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/arborxr/reviews">ArborXR</a> (4.8★, 81 reviews) is the deployment layer behind this at scale. It's device management rather than a content authoring tool, but reviewers including an enterprise manufacturer describe using it to roll out technician and equipment training across a global headset fleet securely, which matters once a program moves past a pilot.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Given how much of this depends on your existing content and headset fleet, are you building new procedure content, deploying to a lot of devices at once, or both?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 17 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;I’d focus on building the procedure content first, then worry about fleet-scale deployment. The real test is whether a subject-matter expert can turn an actual equipment procedure into a realistic scenario, update it when the process changes, and measure whether learners perform the steps correctly. Once that workflow is repeatable, device management becomes the next scaling problem.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 16 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4