Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare SOLIDWORKS and Vectorworks Fundamentals 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CMS IntelliCAD
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
SOLIDWORKS
Star Rating
(620)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SOLIDWORKSVectorworks Fundamentals
Star Rating
(12)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Vectorworks FundamentalsSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SOLIDWORKS excels in 3D/solid modeling tools with a score of 9.7, making it a preferred choice for complex modeling tasks, while Vectorworks Fundamentals, with a score of 9.1, is noted for its ease of use in simpler 3D modeling scenarios.
- Reviewers mention that SOLIDWORKS offers superior rendering tools, scoring 8.0, which enhances the visual quality of designs, whereas Vectorworks Fundamentals has a lower score in this area, indicating it may not meet the same level of visual fidelity.
- G2 users highlight SOLIDWORKS' robust CAD-CAM import capabilities with a score of 9.1, which is crucial for users needing seamless integration between design and manufacturing processes, while Vectorworks Fundamentals lacks in this area, making it less suitable for CAD-CAM workflows.
- Users on G2 appreciate SOLIDWORKS' extensive component libraries, scoring 7.9, which facilitates quicker design processes, while Vectorworks Fundamentals has a lower score in this category, suggesting a more limited selection of pre-made components.
- Reviewers mention that SOLIDWORKS provides better support for file interoperability, scoring 8.0, which is essential for teams working with various file formats, while Vectorworks Fundamentals has a lower score, indicating potential challenges in file compatibility.
- Users say that SOLIDWORKS' quality of support is rated at 8.1, which is higher than Vectorworks Fundamentals' score of 7.8, suggesting that SOLIDWORKS users may have a better experience when seeking assistance or troubleshooting issues.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
SOLIDWORKS
No pricing availableVectorworks Fundamentals
No pricing availableFree Trial
SOLIDWORKS
No trial information availableVectorworks Fundamentals
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
516
8.3
11
Ease of Use
8.6
520
8.3
11
Ease of Setup
8.2
92
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.9
46
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
457
7.8
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
46
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
511
6.8
11
Features by Category
CAD to CAM
9.1
41
Not enough data
8.8
41
Not enough data
8.9
41
Not enough data
CNC Programming
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.4
36
Not enough data
Machining
8.6
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
Design
9.4
99
Not enough data
9.4
99
Not enough data
9.3
95
Not enough data
8.1
95
Not enough data
Edit
8.5
94
Not enough data
8.3
87
Not enough data
9.3
94
Not enough data
8.3
82
Not enough data
Collaboration
8.6
91
Not enough data
9.0
92
Not enough data
8.4
87
Not enough data
Library
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
CAD
8.9
23
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
Integration
8.5
25
Not enough data
9.6
27
Not enough data
8.5
23
Not enough data
Data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.2
24
Not enough data
8.9
24
Not enough data
8.1
22
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
Logistics
9.1
25
Not enough data
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
8.8
60
Not enough data
8.6
46
Not enough data
8.4
51
Not enough data
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
7.6
54
Not enough data
8.6
58
Not enough data
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
7.6
48
Not enough data
8.8
57
Not enough data
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
7.7
47
Not enough data
8.6
52
Not enough data
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
6.1
19
Not enough data
6.1
19
Not enough data
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Options
8.8
43
Not enough data
9.1
42
Not enough data
9.0
41
Not enough data
9.3
43
Not enough data
8.3
34
Not enough data
8.2
40
Not enough data
Tools
9.4
42
Not enough data
9.0
40
Not enough data
9.2
42
Not enough data
Design
9.4
42
Not enough data
Design
7.7
11
Not enough data
7.7
11
Not enough data
Tools
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
Library
8.1
12
Not enough data
Platform
8.5
12
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
Customization
7.6
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
Design
9.2
59
Not enough data
9.0
59
Not enough data
8.8
59
Not enough data
7.6
58
Not enough data
Tools
7.9
52
Not enough data
7.9
54
Not enough data
7.3
47
Not enough data
Work
7.5
40
Not enough data
7.8
41
Not enough data
8.2
48
Not enough data
8.1
43
Not enough data
8.4
46
Not enough data
Environment
8.3
52
Not enough data
8.4
50
Not enough data
8.2
48
Not enough data
8.6
52
Not enough data
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
9.0
24
Not enough data
7.6
24
Not enough data
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.3
24
Not enough data
8.2
23
Not enough data
7.8
25
Not enough data
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
7.5
22
Not enough data
8.2
22
Not enough data
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
7.8
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
SOLIDWORKS and Vectorworks Fundamentals are categorized as General-Purpose CAD
Unique Categories
SOLIDWORKS is categorized as Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD), Simulation & CAE, CAD Viewers, Sketching, PCB Design, Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM), CAD Libraries, CAD Data Exchange, and Additive Manufacturing
Vectorworks Fundamentals has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
SOLIDWORKS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Vectorworks Fundamentals
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
22.7%
Design
12.1%
Automotive
6.6%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
6.0%
Medical Devices
5.8%
Other
46.9%
Architecture & Planning
50.0%
Marketing and Advertising
16.7%
Design
16.7%
Research
8.3%
Museums and Institutions
8.3%
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is SOLIDWORKS used for?
3 Comments
YP
SOLIDWORKS IS USED FOR MULTIPLE WORK LIKE 2D & 3D CAD MODELING, ASSEMBLY MODELING, SHWWET METAL MODELING, SURFACE MODELING, RENDERING, SIMULATION, 3D...Read more
best use o this software
2 Comments
OS
Making 2D sketches and extruding them to make 3d sketches.Read more
Vectorworks Fundamentals has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
