Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Opentext functional Testing for Developers and TestComplete

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Star Rating
(12)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (63.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional Testing for Developers
TestComplete
TestComplete
Star Rating
(97)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TestComplete
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that TestComplete excels in its "Test Variety" capabilities, allowing for a wide range of testing types including functional, regression, and load testing, which reviewers mention enhances its versatility in different testing scenarios.
  • Reviewers mention that OpenText UFT Developer shines in "Customization," with its ability to create custom test scripts using various programming languages, which users say provides greater flexibility for developers looking to tailor their testing processes.
  • G2 users highlight that TestComplete's "Ease of Use" is a significant advantage, with many reviewers stating that its intuitive interface makes it easier for teams to adopt and integrate into their workflows compared to OpenText UFT Developer.
  • Users on G2 report that OpenText UFT Developer has a strong "Quality of Support," with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, which they say is crucial for resolving issues quickly.
  • Reviewers mention that TestComplete's "Test Feedback" feature is particularly robust, providing detailed insights and reports that help teams understand test results better, while users say that OpenText UFT Developer's feedback mechanisms are less comprehensive.
  • Users say that TestComplete's "Product Direction" is viewed positively by 83% of reviewers, indicating a strong confidence in the product's future development, whereas OpenText UFT Developer's direction received a much lower positive rating of 48%, leading to concerns about its long-term viability.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
No pricing available
TestComplete
No pricing available
Free Trial
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
No trial information available
TestComplete
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
9
8.5
82
Ease of Use
8.3
9
8.0
82
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
7.8
36
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.5
35
Quality of Support
8.3
8
8.1
81
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
7.9
36
Product Direction (% positive)
4.2
8
8.3
82
Features by Category
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
TestComplete
TestComplete
Opentext functional Testing for Developers and TestComplete are categorized as Automation Testing and Software Testing
Unique Categories
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Opentext functional Testing for Developers has no unique categories
TestComplete
TestComplete is categorized as Mobile App Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
9.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
63.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
27.3%
TestComplete
TestComplete
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
51.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
28.3%
Reviewers' Industry
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Computer Software
45.5%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Consulting
9.1%
Financial Services
9.1%
Consumer Goods
9.1%
Other
9.1%
TestComplete
TestComplete
Computer Software
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
23.9%
Hospital & Health Care
6.5%
Financial Services
3.3%
Telecommunications
2.2%
Other
39.1%
Alternatives
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Opentext functional Testing for Developers Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Postman
Postman
Add Postman
UiPath Agentic Automation
UiPath Agentic Automation
Add UiPath Agentic Automation
Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence
Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence
Add Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence
TestComplete
TestComplete Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Ranorex Studio
Ranorex Studio
Add Ranorex Studio
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Add Sauce Labs
Katalon Platform
Katalon Platform
Add Katalon Platform
Discussions
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Opentext functional Testing for Developers Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Opentext functional Testing for Developers has no discussions with answers
TestComplete
TestComplete Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
TestComplete has no discussions with answers