Compare Opentext functional Testing for Developers and Postman 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (63.6% of reviews)
Mid-Market (36.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Star Rating
(12)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (63.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional Testing for DevelopersPostman
Star Rating
(1,736)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Postman excels in user experience, with many praising its intuitive interface that makes API testing accessible even for beginners. Users appreciate how easy it is to send requests and test different endpoints, highlighting that they never felt lost while using the tool.
- According to verified reviews, Postman stands out for its robust scripting capabilities, allowing users to create complex automated tests. Reviewers mention features like the "Pre-request Script" and "Tests" tabs, which enable them to programmatically capture tokens and chain requests, elevating their testing process significantly.
- Users say that Opentext functional Testing for Developers shines with its extensive language support, allowing developers to create automated tests in popular programming languages such as Java, C#, and JavaScript. This flexibility is a significant advantage for teams working in diverse coding environments.
- Reviewers mention that while Opentext offers strong cross-browser support and ease of development, it faces challenges in user satisfaction compared to Postman. The overall ratings indicate that users find Postman more user-friendly and easier to set up, which can be crucial for teams looking to implement testing solutions quickly.
- G2 reviewers highlight that Postman has a higher quality of support, with users rating it positively for responsiveness and helpfulness. This aspect is particularly important for teams that may require assistance during their testing processes, as it can significantly impact productivity.
- According to recent feedback, while Opentext has a solid foundation for test maintenance and analysis, it does not match the overall satisfaction and ease of use that Postman provides. Users often express a preference for Postman's streamlined approach, which allows them to achieve quick results without extensive configuration.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
No pricing availablePostman
Free Plan
Free
For individuals or a small team of 3 or less to start testing APIs.
- Up to 3 collaborators
- Access to API Client
- 3 Packages
Free Trial
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
No trial information availablePostman
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
9
9.3
1,358
Ease of Use
8.3
9
9.2
1,376
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.3
622
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.0
189
Quality of Support
8.3
8
8.7
1,128
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.0
161
Product Direction (% positive)
4.2
8
9.2
1,316
Features by Category
API Management
Not enough data
8.8
131
Not enough data
9.1
133
Not enough data
8.7
131
Not enough data
8.8
125
Security Testing
Not enough data
8.6
124
Not enough data
9.4
129
Not enough data
9.5
135
Security Management
Not enough data
8.8
121
Not enough data
8.4
120
Not enough data
7.9
120
Development
Not enough data
9.5
562
Not enough data
8.7
499
Not enough data
8.7
478
Not enough data
8.8
496
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.8
504
Not enough data
8.8
488
Not enough data
8.9
499
Functionality
Not enough data
9.4
30
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
8.9
29
Not enough data
9.5
29
Usability
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
9.4
33
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.9
17
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.9
17
Functionality - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
8.5
16
Data and Analytics - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
9.0
15
Integration - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.9
17
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Development - API Platforms
Not enough data
9.6
350
Not enough data
8.8
281
Not enough data
8.8
256
Not enough data
8.8
267
Collaboration - API Platforms
Not enough data
8.9
286
Not enough data
8.8
264
Not enough data
8.6
254
API Management - API Platforms
Not enough data
9.0
265
Not enough data
8.4
259
Not enough data
8.5
254
Not enough data
8.9
267
Not enough data
8.2
251
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
8.1
167
Not enough data
8.0
163
Not enough data
8.1
164
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
Not enough data
9.5
836
Not enough data
8.7
709
Not enough data
8.7
649
Not enough data
8.7
358
API Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
754
Not enough data
8.9
723
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
632
Data Integration
Not enough data
8.8
665
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Opentext functional Testing for Developers and Postman are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
Opentext functional Testing for Developers is categorized as Automation Testing
Postman is categorized as Service Virtualization, API Platforms, API Development, API Security, API Management, Build Automation, and AI Agent Builders
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Postman
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
45.5%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Consulting
9.1%
Financial Services
9.1%
Consumer Goods
9.1%
Other
9.1%
Computer Software
35.3%
Information Technology and Services
30.3%
Financial Services
3.3%
Banking
2.0%
Internet
1.8%
Other
27.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
Opentext functional Testing for Developers has no discussions with answers
What is Postman used for?
7 Comments
KK
Personnaly i used postman for connect multiple softwares through API.Read more
Is it possible to make such a service in the form of a Web App ?
3 Comments
VN
Hey Shrini,
We recently launched Postman on the Web feature to use on a browser. Make sure to install the Postman Agent file to bypass any CORDS...Read more
Is there any alternative?
3 Comments
LP
There exists Postwoman as an alternative:
https://postwoman.ioRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
