Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Access Manager (NetIQ) and Ping Identity 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
AuthX
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Ory
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (70.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$3 Per User Per Month
OpenText Access Manager (NetIQ)
Star Rating
(10)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Access Manager (NetIQ)Ping Identity
Star Rating
(106)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (70.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$3 Per User Per Month
Learn more about Ping IdentitySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviews say that OpenText NetIQ Access Manager excels in its "Federation/SAML support (idp)" with a rating of 9.2, which users appreciate for seamless integration with identity providers, while Ping Identity also performs well in this area with a rating of 9.0, but some users feel it could offer more flexibility in configurations.
- Users report that Ping Identity shines in "Multi-Factor Authentication" with a score of 8.9, highlighting its diverse authentication methods, including SMS and biometric options, whereas OpenText NetIQ Access Manager has a slightly lower score of 7.8, with reviewers mentioning a need for more modern authentication methods.
- Reviewers mention that the "Ease of Setup" is a strong point for Ping Identity, scoring 8.3, as many users find the installation process straightforward and user-friendly, while OpenText NetIQ Access Manager, with a score of 7.2, has received feedback indicating that its setup can be more complex and time-consuming.
- Users on G2 highlight that OpenText NetIQ Access Manager's "Policy Management" feature scores 8.7, allowing for robust control over user access, but some users feel that Ping Identity's policy enforcement capabilities, rated at 8.2, could be more intuitive and easier to manage.
- G2 users report that Ping Identity's "Cloud Directory" feature, rated at 8.5, is particularly beneficial for enterprises looking for scalable solutions, while OpenText NetIQ Access Manager, with a lower score in this area, is noted for its strong on-premises capabilities but lacks the same level of cloud integration.
- Users say that the "Quality of Support" for both products is commendable, with OpenText NetIQ Access Manager scoring 8.1 and Ping Identity slightly higher at 8.4, but reviewers mention that Ping Identity's support team is often quicker to respond and more helpful in resolving issues.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Access Manager (NetIQ)
No pricing availablePing Identity
Cloud MFA & SSO
$3
Per User Per Month
Ping Identity's IDaaS for IT Departments
- Unlimited multi-factor authentication
- Unlimited single sign-on
- Included contextual capabilities to balance security with convenience
Free Trial
OpenText Access Manager (NetIQ)
No trial information availablePing Identity
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
8
9.0
72
Ease of Use
7.7
8
8.7
74
Ease of Setup
7.2
6
8.3
49
Ease of Admin
8.6
6
8.3
50
Quality of Support
8.1
8
8.4
66
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
6
8.6
48
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
9
8.4
72
Features by Category
Authentication Options
8.1
6
9.1
35
8.1
6
9.1
32
7.8
6
8.9
31
8.3
6
9.1
33
9.2
6
9.0
31
Not enough data
9.4
27
Access Control Types
Not enough data
8.6
22
8.7
5
8.9
28
8.0
5
8.7
25
8.0
5
8.5
17
8.0
5
9.0
17
Administration
7.8
6
8.9
29
8.6
6
8.7
21
7.8
6
8.2
28
8.1
6
8.5
31
Not enough data
8.1
15
Platform
8.6
6
9.4
27
8.0
5
8.8
25
8.3
6
8.8
31
8.1
6
8.6
25
7.8
6
7.3
22
8.3
5
8.1
27
7.3
5
8.8
23
Authentication type
Not enough data
8.5
8
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
5
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
12
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
7
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
13
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
8
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
14
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
8
|
Verified
Functionality
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
Not enough data
Implementation
Not enough data
7.8
16
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.2
10
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
11
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
7
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.3
7
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
7
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
7
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Authentication Risk Management - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Biometric & Behavioral Analysis - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Context-Aware Security Controls - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
8.8
14
Not enough data
8.2
15
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.3
16
Type
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.1
16
Reporting
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
7.4
14
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Authentication & Authorization - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration & Governance - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Access Manager (NetIQ) and Ping Identity are categorized as Single Sign-On (SSO)
Unique Categories
OpenText Access Manager (NetIQ) has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Access Manager (NetIQ)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Ping Identity
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
55.6%
Market Research
11.1%
Internet
11.1%
Higher Education
11.1%
Financial Services
11.1%
Other
0.0%
Information Technology and Services
15.0%
Computer Software
10.0%
Insurance
8.0%
Hospital & Health Care
8.0%
Financial Services
6.0%
Other
53.0%
Discussions
OpenText Access Manager (NetIQ) has no discussions with answers
Ping Identity has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
