Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and QAComplete 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$999 each year per concurrent user
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementQAComplete
Star Rating
(15)3.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$999 each year per concurrent user
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results. In contrast, QAComplete, while functional, does not match this level of performance, leading to some users feeling it lacks depth in test management.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center's integration capabilities are rated at 8.1, which facilitates seamless connections with other tools. However, users on G2 have noted that QAComplete's integration options are more limited, which can hinder workflow efficiency for teams relying on multiple software solutions.
- G2 users highlight that OpenText ALM Quality Center offers superior bug reporting features, particularly in Tester Reports & Feedback, which scored 9.1. This allows teams to gather detailed insights on issues. Conversely, QAComplete's bug reporting features, while adequate, do not provide the same level of detail, leading some users to feel less informed about their testing outcomes.
- Reviewers say that OpenText ALM Quality Center shines in its management capabilities, particularly in Reporting and Version Control, both rated at 8.9. This robust reporting functionality helps teams track progress effectively. QAComplete, while it offers basic reporting, does not provide the same depth, which can leave users wanting more comprehensive insights.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center's organization and reliability are standout features, with scores of 9.7 and 8.7 respectively. This high level of organization helps teams maintain clarity in their testing processes. In contrast, QAComplete's organization features are seen as less intuitive, which can lead to confusion among team members.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center's thoroughness in test management, scoring 9.0, is a significant advantage, as it ensures that all aspects of testing are covered. QAComplete, while functional, does not provide the same level of thoroughness, which can result in gaps in testing coverage that users find concerning.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableQAComplete
On-Premises
$999
each year per concurrent user
On-Premise (You Host)
Free Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableQAComplete
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.1
14
Ease of Use
7.9
118
7.7
14
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.7
106
7.1
13
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
7.5
14
Features by Category
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Automation
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and QAComplete are categorized as Test Management and Software Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
QAComplete has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
QAComplete
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Information Technology and Services
13.3%
Hospital & Health Care
13.3%
Computer Software
13.3%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Staffing and Recruiting
6.7%
Other
46.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
QAComplete has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
