Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenFOAM and SolidWorks Flow Simulation 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (48.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenFOAM
Star Rating
(35)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenFOAMSolidWorks Flow Simulation
Star Rating
(35)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SolidWorks Flow SimulationSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenFOAM excels in fluid analysis with a score of 8.8, providing robust capabilities for complex simulations, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation, with a score of 8.1, is noted for its user-friendly interface but may lack some advanced features that OpenFOAM offers.
- Reviewers mention that OpenFOAM's documentation is highly regarded, scoring 8.7, which helps users navigate its extensive functionalities, whereas SolidWorks Flow Simulation, despite having good documentation, scores slightly lower at 8.3, indicating room for improvement in clarity and comprehensiveness.
- G2 users highlight that SolidWorks Flow Simulation shines in ease of use with a score of 8.3, making it more accessible for beginners, while OpenFOAM's score of 6.7 suggests a steeper learning curve, which may be challenging for new users.
- Users on G2 report that OpenFOAM's integration capabilities score 8.5, allowing for seamless collaboration with other software tools, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation, with a score of 8.5 as well, is praised for its integration with SolidWorks CAD, making it a preferred choice for users already within that ecosystem.
- Reviewers mention that OpenFOAM's support quality is rated at 6.1, indicating potential challenges in obtaining timely assistance, whereas SolidWorks Flow Simulation scores significantly higher at 8.3, reflecting a more responsive support system that users appreciate.
- Users say that OpenFOAM's performance in mechanical event simulation is rated at 7.1, which may not meet the expectations of users looking for high-fidelity simulations, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation scores 8.3, indicating a more reliable performance in this area, particularly for mechanical applications.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenFOAM
No pricing availableSolidWorks Flow Simulation
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenFOAM
No trial information availableSolidWorks Flow Simulation
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.0
26
8.6
30
Ease of Use
6.7
26
8.3
30
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
6.1
21
8.3
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
24
7.1
28
Features by Category
Design
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.8
7
Work
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Design
6.2
11
8.8
8
6.1
11
8.3
8
6.8
11
7.7
8
7.1
12
7.7
8
Tools
8.8
13
8.1
8
6.5
8
7.7
8
6.3
8
8.1
8
Work
6.7
8
8.3
8
6.9
9
8.5
8
7.1
8
8.3
8
6.4
7
7.7
8
6.9
9
8.5
8
Environment
7.1
8
8.1
8
6.8
10
8.3
8
7.4
7
9.0
8
7.2
12
8.8
8
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenFOAM and SolidWorks Flow Simulation are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenFOAM
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
30.3%
Automotive
18.2%
Research
12.1%
Higher Education
9.1%
Oil & Energy
6.1%
Other
24.2%
Information Technology and Services
21.2%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
12.1%
Design
12.1%
Higher Education
9.1%
Automotive
9.1%
Other
36.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
What do you use as mesher? Are there free ones that are good for complex geometries?
1 Comment
CH
I used snappyHexMesh to mesh a complicated geometry and it did well. Many like cfMesh too. If snappyHexMesh is used, can use blockMesh to generate background...Read more
OpenFOAM has no more discussions with answers
SolidWorks Flow Simulation has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
