Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Mathematica and Simcenter Amesim 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (37.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Mathematica
Star Rating
(86)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MathematicaSimcenter Amesim
Star Rating
(116)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Simcenter AmesimSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Simcenter Amesim excels in drag and drop functionality, scoring a high 9.0, which allows for intuitive model creation. In contrast, Mathematica's graphical programming received a lower score of 7.4, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Simcenter Amesim's quality of support is rated at 9.0, making it a reliable partner for businesses. Conversely, Mathematica's support quality is rated at 7.9, suggesting that users may experience longer wait times or less effective assistance.
- G2 users highlight that Simcenter Amesim's fluid analysis tools score 7.8, while Mathematica shines with a score of 8.8, indicating that users find Mathematica's capabilities in fluid dynamics to be superior for complex simulations.
- Users on G2 report that Simcenter Amesim's ease of use is rated at 8.3, which is favorable compared to Mathematica's 7.3. This suggests that Simcenter Amesim may be more user-friendly for those new to systems modeling.
- Reviewers mention that Simcenter Amesim's discrete event modeling is rated at 7.9, while Mathematica offers a higher score of 8.5, indicating that users find Mathematica more effective for simulating event-driven systems.
- Users say that while Simcenter Amesim has a solid entry-level price point, Mathematica's extensive features, particularly in 3D/solid modeling tools, which scored 8.5, may justify its higher cost for users needing advanced capabilities.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Mathematica
No pricing availableSimcenter Amesim
No pricing availableFree Trial
Mathematica
No trial information availableSimcenter Amesim
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
78
8.4
75
Ease of Use
7.3
80
8.2
97
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
7.7
51
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.8
24
Quality of Support
7.9
76
8.9
72
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.5
22
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
79
9.2
72
Features by Category
Design
8.5
8
5.9
49
8.1
9
6.6
51
8.7
10
6.9
51
8.8
8
5.8
49
Tools
8.8
8
7.8
50
8.1
8
5.9
48
7.9
8
7.5
49
Work
8.5
12
8.0
48
8.2
12
8.4
49
8.3
11
7.9
51
9.4
9
6.0
46
9.0
12
7.8
44
Environment
8.2
10
7.2
46
8.3
11
7.2
48
8.3
9
6.8
46
8.6
12
8.1
52
Systems Modeling
Not enough data
6.7
24
Not enough data
6.1
23
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
7.7
25
Not enough data
9.0
24
Requirements
Not enough data
6.9
21
Not enough data
6.5
22
Not enough data
7.0
23
Collaboration
Not enough data
7.4
22
Not enough data
7.4
23
Debugging
Not enough data
7.8
24
Not enough data
6.7
23
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Mathematica and Simcenter Amesim are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Mathematica has no unique categories
Simcenter Amesim is categorized as Systems Engineering And MBSE
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Mathematica
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Simcenter Amesim
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Research
17.4%
Information Technology and Services
9.3%
Higher Education
8.1%
Computer Software
7.0%
Automotive
7.0%
Other
51.2%
Automotive
31.1%
Aviation & Aerospace
13.2%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
12.3%
Airlines/Aviation
8.5%
Higher Education
4.7%
Other
30.2%
Discussions
Is Mathematica better than Matlab?
1 Comment
DS
no but in most of case is more useful
Read more
Mathematica has no more discussions with answers
How can i develop python scripts to automate postprocessing in AMESim? MATLAB or python is better?
1 Comment
MG
Hi!
I have been facing similar problems regarding post-processing and proper recording of parameter changes and their effects on specific signals.
I...Read more
Is AMESim open source?
1 Comment
RN
Simcenter Amesim is a commercial software, but it can integrate open-source codes such as ModelicaRead more
What is Siemens Simcenter?
1 Comment
RN
Simcenter is a set of simulation and test solutions enabling engineers to model and simulate complexity of different systems, explore different design...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
