Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Google Cloud Firestore and MongoDB

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Google Cloud Firestore
Google Cloud Firestore
Star Rating
(95)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.3% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud Firestore
MongoDB
MongoDB
Star Rating
(539)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MongoDB
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that MongoDB excels in data replication with a score of 8.9, which reviewers mention contributes to its reliability in enterprise environments, while Google Cloud Firestore's score of 7.8 indicates some limitations in this area.
  • Reviewers mention that Google Cloud Firestore offers superior ease of setup with a score of 9.2 compared to MongoDB's 8.4, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for quick deployment.
  • G2 users highlight MongoDB's strong query optimization capabilities, scoring 8.6, which reviewers say enhances performance for complex queries, whereas Firestore's score of 8.0 suggests it may not be as efficient in this regard.
  • Users on G2 report that Google Cloud Firestore shines in security features, particularly with its encryption score of 9.1, while MongoDB's score of 8.6 indicates it may not offer the same level of data protection.
  • Reviewers mention that MongoDB's application performance is rated highly at 9.1, which users say is crucial for applications requiring high throughput, while Firestore's performance is slightly lower, impacting its suitability for demanding applications.
  • Users say that MongoDB's multi-model support is beneficial for diverse data types, scoring 8.6, while Google Cloud Firestore's score of 8.2 suggests it may not be as versatile in handling various data models.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Google Cloud Firestore
No pricing available
MongoDB
No pricing available
Free Trial
Google Cloud Firestore
No trial information available
MongoDB
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
79
8.8
418
Ease of Use
8.7
79
8.6
419
Ease of Setup
9.3
23
8.4
192
Ease of Admin
9.2
22
8.1
177
Quality of Support
7.8
74
8.5
363
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
22
8.5
157
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
79
9.1
400
Features by Category
8.3
23
8.5
103
Data Management
8.7
23
8.8
90
8.9
23
8.8
91
8.1
22
8.5
84
8.0
23
8.5
82
Availability
8.0
22
8.2
77
8.0
22
8.3
81
7.8
23
8.6
81
Performance
8.0
19
8.6
85
Security
8.4
23
8.4
83
9.1
23
8.7
87
7.7
20
8.5
82
9.1
23
8.6
80
Support
8.2
20
8.6
80
8.9
19
8.9
83
7.9
18
7.9
68
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database as a Service (DBaaS)Hide 17 FeaturesShow 17 Features
8.5
23
Not enough data
Configuration
9.1
22
Not enough data
7.6
21
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
7.9
19
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
Database Administration
9.0
19
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
8.5
20
Not enough data
Availability
9.1
21
Not enough data
8.6
20
Not enough data
8.8
19
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
Security
8.6
19
Not enough data
8.4
21
Not enough data
8.4
19
Not enough data
Data Management
8.9
20
Not enough data
8.7
19
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Google Cloud Firestore
Google Cloud Firestore
MongoDB
MongoDB
Google Cloud Firestore and MongoDB are categorized as Document Databases
Unique Categories
Google Cloud Firestore
Google Cloud Firestore is categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
MongoDB
MongoDB is categorized as AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Google Cloud Firestore
Google Cloud Firestore
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
54.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.9%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
14.9%
MongoDB
MongoDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
37.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
25.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
37.0%
Reviewers' Industry
Google Cloud Firestore
Google Cloud Firestore
Computer Software
22.3%
Information Technology and Services
11.7%
Education Management
10.6%
Higher Education
4.3%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Other
47.9%
MongoDB
MongoDB
Computer Software
22.8%
Information Technology and Services
20.6%
Internet
5.1%
Financial Services
4.0%
Education Management
3.0%
Other
44.6%
Alternatives
Google Cloud Firestore
Google Cloud Firestore Alternatives
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Add Amazon DynamoDB
MongoDB Atlas
MongoDB Atlas
Add MongoDB Atlas
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
Add Azure Cosmos DB
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Add Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
MongoDB
MongoDB Alternatives
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Add Amazon DynamoDB
Couchbase
Couchbase
Add Couchbase
Redis Software
Redis Software
Add Redis Software
Arango
Arango
Add Arango
Discussions
Google Cloud Firestore
Google Cloud Firestore Discussions
What is Google Cloud Firestore used for?
1 Comment
Anirban D.
AD
this is a no sql database similar like mongo , it is available in google cloud with two different mode Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Google Cloud Firestore has no more discussions with answers
MongoDB
MongoDB Discussions
How to make MongoDB to accept joins
2 Comments
Ambreen Z.
AZ
As MongoDB is a document oriented Database. So data is distributed across different nodes and in order to apply joins, a data should be collected on a...Read more
Is MongoDB a software?
2 Comments
Bhanu Pratap  S.
BS
It's a platform not moreover a softwareRead more
What is MongoDB used for?
2 Comments
Vivek K.
VK
MongoDB is a NoSQL database, that works on concepts of documents, and collections rather than tables and relations. Read more