Users report that Labelbox excels in Quality of Support with a score of 9.1, while Encord has achieved a perfect score of 10.0, indicating that Encord's support is highly regarded for its responsiveness and effectiveness.
Reviewers mention that Encord offers superior Task Quality with a score of 9.8 compared to Labelbox's 9.1, suggesting that users find Encord's labeling tasks to be more accurate and reliable.
G2 users highlight that Labelbox shines in Ease of Setup with a score of 9.0, whereas Encord's score of 8.3 indicates that some users may find Encord's initial setup process to be less straightforward.
Users on G2 report that Encord's Human-in-the-Loop feature is particularly strong, scoring 9.8, which enhances the model training process by integrating human feedback effectively, while Labelbox scores 8.9 in this area.
Reviewers say that Labelbox's Model Training Efficiency is rated at 9.7, which is competitive, but Encord's overall model training capabilities, including pre-built algorithms, are rated higher at 10.0, making it a more attractive option for users focused on model development.
Users report that Encord's Data Quality is rated at 9.6, which is higher than Labelbox's 9.3, indicating that Encord may provide better tools for ensuring the integrity and quality of data used in machine learning projects.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Encord
Simple and scalable pricing
Contact Us
Our pricing scales with your organization. Start building out your data annotation & active learning pipelines today.
Computer vision labeling toolkit
Model assisted labeling using your own models or our proprietary micro-models
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.