Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Direct3D and WebGL 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (46.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Direct3D
Star Rating
(24)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Direct3DWebGL
Star Rating
(18)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about WebGLSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that WebGL has a more straightforward integration process for web applications, making it easier for developers to implement 3D graphics directly in browsers without additional plugins, while Direct3D requires a deeper understanding of Windows-specific APIs.
- Reviewers mention that Direct3D excels in performance optimization, particularly for high-end gaming applications, with features like DirectCompute that allow for advanced parallel processing, which WebGL does not support as robustly.
- G2 users highlight that WebGL's cross-platform compatibility is a significant advantage, allowing applications to run on various devices and operating systems, whereas Direct3D is primarily limited to Windows environments.
- Users on G2 indicate that Direct3D offers more advanced rendering techniques, such as tessellation and advanced shader capabilities, which are crucial for creating visually stunning graphics, while WebGL's capabilities are more basic in comparison.
- Reviewers say that WebGL's community support is strong, with numerous tutorials and resources available for beginners, but some users feel that Direct3D's documentation is more comprehensive for advanced users looking to leverage its full potential.
- Users report that while both platforms have their strengths, Direct3D's support for VR and AR applications is more mature, providing developers with tools that WebGL currently lacks, making it a better choice for cutting-edge immersive experiences.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Direct3D
No pricing availableWebGL
No pricing availableFree Trial
Direct3D
No trial information availableWebGL
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
18
9.2
13
Ease of Use
8.6
18
6.5
12
Ease of Setup
8.0
5
6.7
5
Ease of Admin
6.7
5
5.7
5
Quality of Support
8.1
17
7.8
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
5
6.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
16
5.5
13
Features by Category
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Direct3D and WebGL are categorized as 3D Rendering
Unique Categories
Direct3D has no unique categories
WebGL has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Direct3D
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
WebGL
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
15.0%
Apparel & Fashion
15.0%
Education Management
10.0%
Computer Games
10.0%
Oil & Energy
5.0%
Other
45.0%
Internet
13.3%
Information Technology and Services
13.3%
Design
13.3%
Computer Software
13.3%
Real Estate
6.7%
Other
40.0%
Discussions
Direct3D has no discussions with answers
How the webgl is different from unity3d produced webgl? There are issues with cross browser compatib
1 Comment
MT
https://docs.unity3d.com/Manual/webgl-browsercompatibility.htmlRead more
WebGL has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
