Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Cucumber and Perforce ALM

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Cucumber
Cucumber
Star Rating
(39)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Cucumber
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM
Star Rating
(102)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (42.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Perforce ALM
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Reviews say that Helix ALM excels in "Requirements Listing" with a score of 9.3, indicating that users find it highly effective for managing and tracking requirements, while Cucumber, although strong, does not match this level of detail.
  • Users report that Helix ALM's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.7, which reviewers mention as a significant advantage, especially for mid-market companies needing reliable assistance, whereas Cucumber's support rating of 7.8 leaves some users wanting more responsiveness.
  • Reviewers mention that Helix ALM provides superior "Traceability" with a score of 8.8, allowing teams to easily track changes and relationships between requirements and tests, while Cucumber's traceability features are less robust, leading to potential gaps in tracking.
  • Users on G2 highlight that Helix ALM's "Centralized Information" feature, also rated at 9.3, is particularly beneficial for teams needing a single source of truth, whereas Cucumber's approach to information management is less centralized, which can complicate collaboration.
  • G2 users report that Helix ALM's "Bug Monitoring" capabilities, especially in "Analytics" and "Bug History," are rated at 8.6 and 8.7 respectively, providing comprehensive insights into bug trends, while Cucumber's analytics features are perceived as less detailed, which may hinder effective bug tracking.
  • Users say that Helix ALM's "Automated Creation & Testing" feature scores 8.6, making it a strong choice for teams looking to streamline their testing processes, while Cucumber, while effective for behavior-driven development, does not offer the same level of automation, which can slow down testing cycles.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cucumber
No pricing available
Perforce ALM
No pricing available
Free Trial
Cucumber
No trial information available
Perforce ALM
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
27
8.3
95
Ease of Use
8.1
27
7.8
95
Ease of Setup
8.1
9
7.2
71
Ease of Admin
7.6
7
7.4
63
Quality of Support
8.0
26
8.7
81
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.4
7
8.7
65
Product Direction (% positive)
7.6
24
7.1
92
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.5
14
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.6
14
Not enough data
8.8
13
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
8.7
14
Not enough data
8.7
14
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Requirements ManagementHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
8.6
7
Administration
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Communication
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Procedural
Not enough data
8.6
7
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cucumber
Cucumber
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM
Cucumber and Perforce ALM are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
Cucumber
Cucumber has no unique categories
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM is categorized as ALM Software, Bug Tracking, and Requirements Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cucumber
Cucumber
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
32.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
29.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
38.2%
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
23.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
42.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
35.0%
Reviewers' Industry
Cucumber
Cucumber
Information Technology and Services
29.4%
Computer Software
17.6%
Retail
8.8%
Food & Beverages
5.9%
Financial Services
5.9%
Other
32.4%
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM
Computer Software
16.0%
Information Technology and Services
13.0%
Medical Devices
12.0%
Telecommunications
6.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
49.0%
Alternatives
Cucumber
Cucumber Alternatives
Postman
Postman
Add Postman
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Add Apache JMeter
Cypress
Cypress
Add Cypress
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM Alternatives
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Add OpenText Application Quality Management
codebeamer
codebeamer
Add codebeamer
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
Add IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
Jira
Jira
Add Jira
Discussions
Cucumber
Cucumber Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Cucumber has no discussions with answers
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM Discussions
What is Helix ALM used for?
1 Comment
Official Response from Perforce ALM
Helix ALM is used to manage requirements, issues, and all types of testing, for automated, end-to-end traceability. It's often used by organizations in...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Perforce ALM has no more discussions with answers