Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cube and Oracle Essbase 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aleph
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ClearPoint Strategy
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (79.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (76.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Cube
Star Rating
(122)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (79.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CubeOracle Essbase
Star Rating
(244)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Oracle EssbaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Oracle Essbase excels in data import capabilities with a score of 9.3, allowing for seamless integration of large datasets, while Cube Software's data import score of 8.3 indicates some limitations in handling complex data structures.
- Reviewers mention that Cube Software shines in ease of use, scoring 9.0 compared to Oracle Essbase's 7.9, making it more accessible for users who may not have extensive technical expertise.
- G2 users highlight Oracle Essbase's strong performance in data consolidation with a score of 9.3, which is crucial for organizations needing to merge data from multiple sources, whereas Cube Software's score of 8.8 suggests it may not be as robust in this area.
- Users on G2 report that Cube Software offers superior quality of support, achieving a score of 9.2, while Oracle Essbase lags behind with a score of 6.0, indicating a potential challenge for users needing timely assistance.
- Reviewers say that Oracle Essbase provides advanced budgeting features, particularly in budget periods with a score of 8.8, which is essential for organizations with complex financial planning needs, while Cube Software's performance in this area is not as strong.
- Users mention that Cube Software's reporting capabilities are impressive, particularly in standard reports with a score of 8.0, but Oracle Essbase outperforms in custom reporting with a score of 9.1, allowing for more tailored insights.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cube
No pricing availableOracle Essbase
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cube
Free Trial is available
Oracle Essbase
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
98
8.4
122
Ease of Use
8.9
98
7.9
123
Ease of Setup
8.7
51
6.7
82
Ease of Admin
9.1
46
7.2
83
Quality of Support
9.1
97
6.0
115
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
48
6.7
80
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
91
6.8
111
Features by Category
Budget Creation
8.2
62
Not enough data
8.6
57
Not enough data
8.6
59
Not enough data
8.2
61
Not enough data
7.9
47
Not enough data
8.8
56
Not enough data
Budget Management
8.7
50
Not enough data
8.2
49
Not enough data
8.1
43
Not enough data
Forecasting
8.8
56
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
8.6
48
Not enough data
8.4
49
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
Analytics
8.7
58
Not enough data
8.7
53
Not enough data
8.5
49
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Budgeting and Forecasting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.3
59
9.3
12
8.8
53
9.3
12
8.5
55
8.8
11
Reporting Structure
8.7
50
8.6
11
8.1
49
8.1
12
8.3
46
8.8
11
Standard Analytics
8.1
42
8.1
12
8.0
46
9.0
12
8.6
56
9.1
11
8.4
59
9.1
11
Custom Analytics
6.6
50
8.9
11
7.5
50
8.3
10
8.6
54
8.9
12
8.7
53
8.6
11
8.3
10
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Financial Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reconciliation
9.1
32
Not enough data
9.1
31
Not enough data
8.6
25
Not enough data
Reporting
9.1
33
Not enough data
8.8
30
Not enough data
9.1
32
Not enough data
Closing Process
8.8
18
Not enough data
8.3
18
Not enough data
9.0
24
Not enough data
AI - Financial Close
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Financial Planning
8.8
12
Not enough data
9.1
18
Not enough data
8.2
16
Not enough data
Agentic AI - FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Financial Insight
9.4
18
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
9.1
19
Not enough data
Data
6.9
18
Not enough data
8.3
19
Not enough data
9.3
20
Not enough data
8.4
19
Not enough data
Status Communication
8.4
20
Not enough data
9.4
18
Not enough data
7.9
16
Not enough data
7.8
12
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cube and Oracle Essbase are categorized as Financial Analysis
Unique Categories
Cube is categorized as Financial Close, FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis), and Budgeting and Forecasting
Oracle Essbase has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Oracle Essbase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
13.1%
Computer Software
12.3%
Financial Services
9.8%
Marketing and Advertising
4.1%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
4.1%
Other
56.6%
Insurance
9.4%
Information Technology and Services
8.6%
Financial Services
8.2%
Oil & Energy
6.4%
Hospitality
5.2%
Other
62.2%
Discussions
Cube has no discussions with answers
Oracle Essbase has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
