Users report that OpenText TeamSite's content authoring capabilities score lower at 7.4 compared to Concrete CMS's 8.6, indicating that Concrete CMS offers a more user-friendly and efficient authoring experience.
Reviewers mention that the rich text editor in Concrete CMS is rated at 8.8, significantly higher than OpenText TeamSite's 6.3, suggesting that users find Concrete CMS's editor more versatile and easier to use for content creation.
G2 users highlight that Concrete CMS excels in mobile responsiveness with a score of 8.0, while OpenText TeamSite lags behind at 4.9, making Concrete CMS a better choice for businesses prioritizing mobile-friendly content.
Users on G2 note that the asset management features in Concrete CMS are rated at 8.5, compared to OpenText TeamSite's 6.8, indicating that Concrete CMS provides a more robust solution for managing digital assets.
Reviewers mention that Concrete CMS offers better SEO capabilities with a score of 8.9, while OpenText TeamSite only scores 6.7, making Concrete CMS a more favorable option for businesses focused on search engine optimization.
Users say that the ease of setup is a significant advantage for Concrete CMS, which scores 8.6 compared to OpenText TeamSite's 3.8, suggesting that Concrete CMS is more accessible for small businesses looking to implement a CMS quickly.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Concrete CMS
Free and Open Source
0/mo
Unlimited
Do anything you want with Concrete CMS on your own.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.