Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and SAFE 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
SafeBase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ManageEngine Log360
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Perimeter
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (73.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Star Rating
(217)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)SAFE
Star Rating
(59)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (73.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about SAFESummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Cisco Vulnerability Management excels in its Risk-Prioritization feature, scoring 9.1, which allows teams to focus on the most critical vulnerabilities first. In contrast, SAFE's risk prioritization capabilities are less emphasized, leading to a lower user satisfaction in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Cisco's Vulnerability Intelligence feature, rated at 8.7, provides comprehensive insights that help organizations understand the context of vulnerabilities better. SAFE, while offering similar features, does not match the depth of intelligence provided by Cisco, which users find crucial for informed decision-making.
- G2 users highlight the Vulnerability Scanning capabilities of Cisco, which scored 8.4, as being robust and effective in identifying potential threats. Users on G2 have noted that SAFE's scanning features, while functional, do not deliver the same level of thoroughness, leading to occasional oversights.
- Reviewers say that Cisco's Dashboards are user-friendly and provide a clear overview of vulnerabilities, scoring 8.5. In comparison, SAFE's dashboard functionality is perceived as less intuitive, making it harder for users to quickly assess their security posture.
- Users report that Cisco's Automated Remediation feature, with a score of 7.3, is a significant advantage, allowing for quicker responses to vulnerabilities. SAFE's automation capabilities are noted to be less effective, which can lead to delays in addressing critical issues.
- Reviewers mention that Cisco's Monitoring and Alerts system is highly regarded for its reliability and responsiveness, contributing to a proactive security approach. SAFE's monitoring features, while adequate, do not provide the same level of assurance, leading to mixed reviews from users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
No pricing availableSAFE
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Free Trial is available
SAFE
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
158
8.3
48
Ease of Use
8.5
161
8.3
48
Ease of Setup
8.4
73
8.1
44
Ease of Admin
8.4
75
8.2
35
Quality of Support
8.7
137
9.2
48
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
74
8.5
35
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
150
9.5
46
Features by Category
Risk Analysis
9.0
128
8.8
20
8.5
127
7.4
20
9.1
124
8.8
20
Vulnerability Assesment
8.4
118
8.1
20
8.7
126
8.1
19
8.3
126
7.7
18
8.5
126
7.7
19
Automation
7.3
92
Feature Not Available
7.5
91
7.6
19
7.7
94
Feature Not Available
7.6
87
Feature Not Available
Functionality
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Risk assessment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI - Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Assessment
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
7.6
14
Risk Control
Not enough data
8.3
14
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.0
14
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.3
14
Not enough data
7.9
14
Not enough data
8.3
14
Reporting
Not enough data
6.8
14
Not enough data
8.3
14
Not enough data
8.3
14
Agentic AI - Third Party & Supplier Risk Management
Not enough data
6.5
12
Not enough data
7.2
12
Generative AI
Not enough data
5.9
23
Monitoring - IT Risk Management
Not enough data
7.0
23
Agentic AI - IT Risk Management
Not enough data
5.7
19
Not enough data
6.5
19
Generative AI - Security Compliance
Not enough data
7.1
7
Not enough data
6.7
7
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and SAFE are categorized as Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Unique Categories
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) has no unique categories
SAFE is categorized as Security Compliance, Third Party & Supplier Risk Management, Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment, and IT Risk Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SAFE
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
22.0%
Financial Services
12.0%
Retail
8.0%
Computer & Network Security
7.5%
Computer Software
6.5%
Other
44.0%
Information Technology and Services
17.5%
Hospital & Health Care
14.0%
Hospitality
8.8%
Financial Services
8.8%
Insurance
7.0%
Other
43.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is the best way to onboard new user/hire to leverage the Kenna tool to its fullest ?
1 Comment
SM
Andy - thanks for reaching out with this question. Customers have the option to engage with the Kenna CX team and related resources. We have developed an...Read more
Is there a way to sort by most recently changed asset scores?
1 Comment
SM
"Hi Matt. You are correct. You cannot sort directly on the last time that an asset score changed, but remember that Kenna is designed to pull you out of the...Read more
Training - is there training that I can take to be more efficient with this tool?
1 Comment
SM
Joe - Excellent question. Customers have the option to engage with their assigned CX team, and for those customers who have elected to have a lower touch...Read more
SAFE has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
