Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Nucleus 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us 1 Application / Device
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Star Rating
(217)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)Nucleus
Star Rating
(31)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 Application / Device
Free Trial is available
Learn more about NucleusSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviews say that Cisco Vulnerability Management excels in risk scoring with a rating of 9.0, which users appreciate for its ability to prioritize vulnerabilities effectively, while Nucleus follows closely with a score of 8.8, indicating a strong but slightly less robust risk assessment capability.
- Users report that Nucleus shines in vulnerability intelligence, achieving a score of 9.1, which reviewers mention helps them stay ahead of emerging threats, whereas Cisco Vulnerability Management has a solid score of 8.7, suggesting it may not be as comprehensive in threat intelligence.
- Reviewers mention that Nucleus offers superior automated remediation features, scoring 8.8, which users find particularly beneficial for streamlining their security processes, while Cisco Vulnerability Management's score of 7.3 indicates room for improvement in this area.
- Users on G2 highlight that Cisco Vulnerability Management provides a more user-friendly experience with an ease of use score of 8.5, compared to Nucleus's 8.8, suggesting that while both are user-friendly, Nucleus may have a slight edge in overall usability.
- G2 users report that Nucleus's workflow automation capabilities are rated highly at 8.9, which reviewers say significantly enhances their operational efficiency, while Cisco Vulnerability Management's score of 7.5 indicates it may not offer the same level of automation in workflows.
- Users say that both products have comparable quality of support, each scoring 8.7, but reviewers mention that Cisco Vulnerability Management has a slight advantage in being a good partner in business, with a score of 8.9, indicating strong customer relationships.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
No pricing availableNucleus
Nucleus Security
Contact Us
1 Application / Device
- Asset & Vulnerability Inventory
- Contextual Threat Enrichment
- Analyst Workbench
Free Trial
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Free Trial is available
Nucleus
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
158
8.3
23
Ease of Use
8.5
161
8.8
24
Ease of Setup
8.4
73
8.3
13
Ease of Admin
8.4
75
8.3
13
Quality of Support
8.7
137
8.7
23
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
74
8.9
12
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
150
9.3
17
Features by Category
Risk Analysis
9.0
128
8.9
14
8.5
127
8.5
14
9.1
124
9.0
14
Vulnerability Assesment
8.4
118
9.0
12
8.7
126
9.2
14
8.3
126
8.3
14
8.5
126
8.3
14
Automation
7.3
92
8.6
11
7.5
91
8.9
12
7.7
94
8.2
10
7.6
87
8.1
8
ServiceNow Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - ServiceNow Store Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Identification and Assessment - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring and Integration - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Nucleus are categorized as Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Unique Categories
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) has no unique categories
Nucleus is categorized as Exposure Management Platforms and ServiceNow Store Apps
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Nucleus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
22.0%
Financial Services
12.0%
Retail
8.0%
Computer & Network Security
7.5%
Computer Software
6.5%
Other
44.0%
Computer & Network Security
30.0%
Airlines/Aviation
30.0%
Financial Services
10.0%
Information Technology and Services
6.7%
Computer Software
6.7%
Other
16.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is there a way to sort by most recently changed asset scores?
1 Comment
SM
"Hi Matt. You are correct. You cannot sort directly on the last time that an asset score changed, but remember that Kenna is designed to pull you out of the...Read more
Training - is there training that I can take to be more efficient with this tool?
1 Comment
SM
Joe - Excellent question. Customers have the option to engage with their assigned CX team, and for those customers who have elected to have a lower touch...Read more
What is the best way to onboard new user/hire to leverage the Kenna tool to its fullest ?
1 Comment
SM
Andy - thanks for reaching out with this question. Customers have the option to engage with the Kenna CX team and related resources. We have developed an...Read more
How to retain my preferences.
1 Comment
AD
Hello Pradeep! The capability to retain preferences is on our roadmap and has been prioritized, as it is a request from multiple large-enterprise customers.Read more
Nucleus has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
