Link copied to clipboard

# Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Nucleus Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/nucleus-security-inc-nucleus/export.csv)

Cisco Vulnerability...Nucleus[+ Add Product](#)

Reviews

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**[

4.3/5(217)

](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews#reviews)

**Nucleus** [

4.5/5(32)

](https://www.g2.com/products/nucleus-security-inc-nucleus/reviews#reviews)

Pricing

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
Free Trial

No pricing available

**Nucleus**
Free Trial

**Contact Us** 1 Application / Device · Nucleus Security

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
3 months

Based on 6 responses

**Nucleus**
Not enough reviews yet

Return on Investment

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
22 months

Based on 26 responses

**Nucleus**
Not enough reviews yet

Perceived Cost

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
$$$$$

**Nucleus**
Not enough reviews yet

Average Discount

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
15%

**Nucleus**
Not enough reviews yet

Pros & Cons

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
Not enough data

**Nucleus**
[
Automation (1)
](https://www.g2.com/products/nucleus-security-inc-nucleus/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2371764&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Customization (1)
](https://www.g2.com/products/nucleus-security-inc-nucleus/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2371683&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Inadequate Remediation (1)
](https://www.g2.com/products/nucleus-security-inc-nucleus/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2371707&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)

Screenshots

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**
 ![Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/122977/Kenna.VM-Home-Page.png)

**Nucleus**
 ![Nucleus screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/133217/pd-mmlarge-blur.png)

Ratings

Meets Requirements

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**

8.6

8.6158

**Nucleus**

8.3

8.323

Ease of Use

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**

8.5

8.5161

**Nucleus**

8.8

8.824

Ease of Setup

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**

8.4

8.473

**Nucleus**

8.3

8.313

Ease of Admin

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**

8.4

8.475

**Nucleus**

8.3

8.313

Quality of Support

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**

8.7

8.7137

**Nucleus**

8.7

8.723

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**

8.9

8.974

**Nucleus**

8.9

8.912

Product Direction (% positive)

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)**

8.7

8.7150

**Nucleus**

9.3

9.317

Features

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management[Hide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features](javascript:void(0);)

8.2

143

8.6

15

Risk Analysis

Risk Scoring

9.0(won by 0.1)

128

8.9

14

Reporting

8.5(tied score)

127

8.5(tied score)

14

Risk-Prioritization

9.1(won by 0.1)

124

9.0

14

Vulnerability Assesment

Vulnerability Scanning

8.4

118

9.0(won by 0.6)

12

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Vulnerability Intelligence

8.7

126

9.2(won by 0.5)

14

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Contextual Data

8.3(tied score)

126

8.3(tied score)

14

Dashboards

8.5(won by 0.2)

126

8.3

14

Automation

Automated Remediation

7.3

92

8.6(won by 1.3)

11

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Workflow Automation

7.5

91

8.9(won by 1.4)

12

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Security Testing

7.7

94

8.2(won by 0.5)

10

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Test Automation

7.6

87

8.1(won by 0.5)

8

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Show 3 feature categories with incomplete data

Vulnerability Management[Hide 36 FeaturesShow 36 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

Not enough data

Additional Functionality

Search/Filter

Not enough data

Not enough data

Risk Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Generative AI

Not enough data

Not enough data

Alerts/Notifications

Not enough data

Not enough data

Compliance Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Third-Party Integrations

Not enough data

Not enough data

Certificate Assessment

Not enough data

Not enough data

API

Not enough data

Not enough data

Incident Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Automated Containment

Not enough data

Not enough data

Real-Time Data

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Scanning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Monitoring

Not enough data

Not enough data

Policy Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Asset Discovery

Not enough data

Not enough data

Penetration Testing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Runtime Container Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Activity Dashboard

Not enough data

Not enough data

Security Auditing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Issue Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Threat Intelligence

Not enough data

Not enough data

Patch Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Endpoint Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Collaboration Tools

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Goal Setting/Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Assessment

Not enough data

Not enough data

Asset Tagging

Not enough data

Not enough data

Assessment Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Access Controls/Permissions

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI Copilot

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability/Threat Prioritization

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Protection

Not enough data

Not enough data

Risk Assessment

Not enough data

Not enough data

Reporting/Analytics

Not enough data

Not enough data

SQL Injections

Not enough data

Not enough data

ServiceNow Store Apps[Hide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

Not enough data

ServiceNow Apps

ServiceNow Integration

Not enough data

Not enough data

Value

Not enough data

Not enough data

Agentic AI - ServiceNow Store Apps

Autonomous Task Execution

Not enough data

Not enough data

Multi-step Planning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Cross-system Integration

Not enough data

Not enough data

Proactive Assistance

Not enough data

Not enough data

Exposure Management Platforms[Hide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

Not enough data

Generative AI - Exposure Management Platforms

Predictive Analytics

Not enough data

Not enough data

Automated Threat Detection

Not enough data

Not enough data

Risk Identification and Assessment - Exposure Management Platforms

Comprehensive Risk Assessment

Not enough data

Not enough data

Advanced Analytics and Reporting

Not enough data

Not enough data

Monitoring and Integration - Exposure Management Platforms

Integration and Data Consolidation

Not enough data

Not enough data

Real-time Monitoring and Alerts

Not enough data

Not enough data

User Insights

Reviewers' Company Size

[![Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_522b7c020f205bc7a58f4cf24758aed7/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm.jpg "Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)")](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews)

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

6.5%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

17.0%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

76.5%

[![Nucleus](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/4f736a33f154423b66d7d98e5d0d7bfe/nucleus-security-inc-nucleus.svg "Nucleus")](https://www.g2.com/products/nucleus-security-inc-nucleus/reviews)

Nucleus

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

9.7%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

38.7%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

51.6%

Small-Business

(50 or fewer emp.)

6.5%

9.7%

Mid-Market

(51-1000 emp.)

17.0%

38.7%

Enterprise

(\> 1000 emp.)

76.5%

51.6%

Reviewers' Industry

[![Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_522b7c020f205bc7a58f4cf24758aed7/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm.jpg "Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)")](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Information Technology and Services

22.0%

Financial Services

12.0%

Retail

8.0%

Computer & Network Security

7.5%

Computer Software

6.5%

Other

44.0%

[![Nucleus](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/4f736a33f154423b66d7d98e5d0d7bfe/nucleus-security-inc-nucleus.svg "Nucleus")](https://www.g2.com/products/nucleus-security-inc-nucleus/reviews)
Nucleus

Computer & Network Security

30.0%

Airlines/Aviation

30.0%

Financial Services

10.0%

Information Technology and Services

6.7%

Computer Software

6.7%

Other

16.7%

FAQs

## Cisco Vulnerability... vs Nucleus FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 15, 2026

### What is the difference between Cisco Vulnerability... vs Nucleus?

Nucleus stands out for its higher G2 rating and reviewer-cited strengths in automation and customization, while Cisco Vulnerability... is noted for its informative dashboards and risk prioritization capabilities.

| | [Cisco Vulnerability...](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews) | [Nucleus](https://www.g2.com/products/nucleus-security-inc-nucleus/reviews) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| G2 Rating (reviews) | 4.3/5 (217 reviews) | 4.5/5 (32 reviews) |
| Largest Segment | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Ease of Setup score | 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Quality of Support score | 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | Informative dashboards and risk prioritization | Automation and customization |

### How do the pricing models of Cisco Vulnerability... and Nucleus compare?

Reviewers consider Nucleus the stronger value based on satisfaction scores for price and cost-related dimensions.

- **Cisco Vulnerability...:** In recent reviews, several reviewers mention concerns about pricing flexibility and cost limitations, especially for organizations or startups.
- **Nucleus:** Reviewers highlight the platform's automation and customization capabilities as delivering strong value, with positive sentiment around its API-centric design and workflow efficiency.

### What are the best alternatives to Cisco Vulnerability... and Nucleus?

The top three alternatives to Cisco Vulnerability... and Nucleus are Tenable Vulnerability..., InsightVM (Nexpose), and Wiz.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Cisco Vulnerability...](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews) | 4.3/5 (217 reviews) | Enterprise | Reviewers note cost concerns and limited pricing flexibility | Informative dashboards and risk prioritization |
| [Nucleus](https://www.g2.com/products/nucleus-security-inc-nucleus/reviews) | 4.5/5 (32 reviews) | Enterprise | Reviewers highlight strong value from automation and customization | Automation and customization |
| [Tenable Vulnerability...](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-vulnerability-management/reviews) | 4.5/5 (126 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — |
| [InsightVM (Nexpose)](https://www.g2.com/products/insightvm-nexpose/reviews) | 4.4/5 (79 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — |
| [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) | 4.7/5 (844 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — |

### Which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management features should I prioritize when comparing Cisco Vulnerability... and Nucleus?

Buyers should prioritize automation, reporting, dashboard usability, risk prioritization, and integration capabilities when comparing Cisco Vulnerability... and Nucleus.

- **Automation:** Nucleus is cited for automation in recent reviews (1 all-time mention); Cisco Vulnerability... does not have automation as a top-cited theme.
- **Reporting:** Both products are frequently mentioned for reporting, with Nucleus having 1 all-time mention and Cisco Vulnerability... highlighted for informative dashboards and reporting features in recent reviews.
- **Dashboard Usability:** Nucleus is cited for dashboard customization and usability (1 all-time mention each); Cisco Vulnerability... is noted for its informative dashboards and risk visualization.
- **Risk Prioritization:** Cisco Vulnerability... is frequently praised for risk-based prioritization and actionable insights; Nucleus is also recognized for risk scoring and prioritization in recent reviews.
- **Integration Capabilities:** Both products are mentioned for integration, with Nucleus reviewers highlighting API-centric design and Cisco Vulnerability... noted for integration with other security tools.

### What are the pros and cons of Cisco Vulnerability... vs Nucleus?

Cisco Vulnerability...'s headline strength is its informative dashboards and risk prioritization, while Nucleus is recognized for automation and customization.

- **Cisco Vulnerability... strengths:** Informative dashboards, risk-based prioritization, actionable remediation guidance, and integration with other security tools.
- **Cisco Vulnerability... trade-offs:** Reviewers note cost concerns, limited pricing flexibility, a learning curve for setup, and requests for more customizable reporting and dashboard features.
- **Nucleus strengths:** Automation (1 all-time mention), customization (1 all-time mention), dashboard usability and customization (1 all-time mention each), API-centric design, and workflow efficiency.
- **Nucleus trade-offs:** Reviewers mention reporting limitations, occasional platform bugs, and requests for improved filtering and export features.

### Is Cisco Vulnerability... or Nucleus better for small businesses?

Neither Cisco Vulnerability... nor Nucleus is primarily focused on small businesses, as both have Enterprise as their largest reviewer segment.

- **Cisco Vulnerability...:** Largest segment is Enterprise; reviewers highlight informative dashboards and risk prioritization, but note cost concerns for smaller organizations.
- **Nucleus:** Largest segment is Enterprise; reviewers emphasize automation and customization, with positive sentiment around workflow efficiency and API-centric design.

### Which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management platform has better integrations?

Reviewers favor Nucleus for integrations due to its API-centric design and automation capabilities.

- **Cisco Vulnerability...:** Reviewers mention integration with other security tools and platforms, including Cisco XDR, but do not cite specific third-party integrations with high frequency.
- **Nucleus:** Reviewers highlight API-centric design, automation engine, and integration with asset scanners and ticketing systems, with positive sentiment around the breadth and flexibility of integrations.

### How do Cisco Vulnerability... and Nucleus compare on customer support?

Cisco Vulnerability... and Nucleus are rated equally on Quality of Support, both scoring 8.7, indicating parity in reviewer satisfaction.

- **Cisco Vulnerability...:** Reviewers describe generally responsive support, though some mention delays in addressing complex issues and requests for more customized solutions.
- **Nucleus:** Reviewers consistently praise proactive and helpful customer support, with several noting strong partnerships and responsiveness to feature requests.

### Which is easier to implement, Cisco Vulnerability... or Nucleus?

Cisco Vulnerability... and Nucleus score within a tenth of a point on Ease of Setup, indicating near parity in implementation experience (8.4 vs 8.3).

- **Cisco Vulnerability...:** Reviewers note an intuitive interface but mention a learning curve for setup and onboarding, with some citing the need for training to unlock full potential.
- **Nucleus:** Reviewers highlight easy navigation and modular setup, but some mention that initial configuration and integration with existing tools can require effort and learning.

### Which product has better Reporting?

Reporting is a frequently mentioned feature for both Cisco Vulnerability... and Nucleus, with reviewers highlighting its importance in recent feedback.

- **Cisco Vulnerability...:** Reviewers praise informative dashboards and reporting features, with several noting the clarity and detail of reports, though some request more customization options.
- **Nucleus:** Reporting is cited as a key feature (1 all-time mention), with reviewers noting efficient scheduling, advanced filtering, and export capabilities, but some mention limitations in report customization and export functionality.

Alternatives

**Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Alternatives**

 ![Tenable Vulnerability Management](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/127e03b7d601741c15306f07b0f8cf84/tenable-vulnerability-management.svg "Tenable Vulnerability Management")

[
Tenable Vulnerability...
](/products/tenable-vulnerability-management/reviews)

 ![InsightVM (Nexpose)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1d6a2407e149c3d13d93bc4b09b076d6/insightvm-nexpose.svg "InsightVM (Nexpose)")

[
InsightVM (Nexpose)
](/products/insightvm-nexpose/reviews)

 ![Brinqa](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/e509d02a002cc556a1ad3d93d3f8c5be/brinqa.svg "Brinqa")

[
Brinqa
](/products/brinqa/reviews)

 ![Qualys VMDR](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_8f9c479b207589ba8dc7777f344ab0ac/qualys-vmdr.png "Qualys VMDR")

[
Qualys VMDR
](/products/qualys-vmdr/reviews)

**Nucleus Alternatives**

 ![Wiz](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/991dbad301661dc9e1b78a7e252252b4/wiz-wiz.svg "Wiz")

[
Wiz
](/products/wiz-wiz/reviews)

 ![CloudBees](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/87a3b92cea3fbc3b93144f9fd68c968d/cloudbees.svg "CloudBees")

[
CloudBees
](/products/cloudbees/reviews)

 ![Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/4c3b85f837807793635c7c336ce2a6a7/ivanti-autonomous-endpoint-management.svg "Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management")

[
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management
](/products/ivanti-autonomous-endpoint-management/reviews)

 ![Arctic Wolf](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/e17f8827b53eed6a18e05b301c792617/arctic-wolf.svg "Arctic Wolf")

[
Arctic Wolf
](/products/arctic-wolf/reviews)

## Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Nucleus

When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Nucleus easier to use. However, reviewers preferred the ease of set up for Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) along with administration. Reviewers agreed that both vendors make it equally easy to do business overall.

- Reviewers felt that Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) meets the needs of their business better than Nucleus.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Nucleus provide similar levels of assistance.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Nucleus over Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM).