Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Canonical LXC and Red Hat OpenShift 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (71.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (49.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Canonical LXC
Star Rating
(14)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (71.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Canonical LXCRed Hat OpenShift
Star Rating
(303)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (49.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Red Hat OpenShiftSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Red Hat OpenShift excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to Canonical LXC. Users appreciate its intuitive dashboard that consolidates essential functions, making orchestration tasks much simpler.
- Users say that Canonical LXC offers a strong performance for creating containers, with many highlighting its stability and ease of use. The open-source nature of LXC allows for extensive community support and troubleshooting resources, which is particularly beneficial for startups.
- According to verified reviews, Red Hat OpenShift stands out for its comprehensive integration, which helps eliminate the usual complexities associated with Kubernetes. Reviewers mention that it provides a smoother path from code to production, making it a reliable choice for enterprise-level applications.
- Reviewers mention that Canonical LXC shines in its ease of setup, with many users finding the initial configuration straightforward. This is particularly appealing for smaller businesses looking for a quick deployment without extensive overhead.
- Users appreciate the quality of support provided by Red Hat OpenShift, noting that it effectively supports various applications, including complex deployments like the Maximo application suite. This level of support is crucial for enterprises that require dependable assistance.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while both platforms offer strong virtualization capabilities, Canonical LXC's focus on container networking is particularly praised, with users noting its effectiveness in creating isolated environments. In contrast, OpenShift's orchestration features are seen as more robust, making it a better fit for larger teams.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Canonical LXC
No pricing availableRed Hat OpenShift
No pricing availableFree Trial
Canonical LXC
No trial information availableRed Hat OpenShift
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
13
8.7
83
Ease of Use
8.2
13
8.2
226
Ease of Setup
9.0
5
7.8
193
Ease of Admin
9.3
5
8.6
57
Quality of Support
7.8
10
8.4
73
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
5
8.6
53
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
12
9.0
80
Features by Category
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Server Virtualization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Alerts management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.0
5
Monitoring
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Automation
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Analysis
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Issue Resolution
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.3
5
Development
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.5
17
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
9.1
18
Not enough data
9.2
16
Database
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.6
22
Infrastructure
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.2
24
Management
Not enough data
8.5
32
Not enough data
8.4
31
8.3
5
8.2
30
Organization
Not enough data
8.5
32
9.7
5
8.9
33
8.3
5
9.1
31
Development
Not enough data
8.5
27
Not enough data
8.8
30
Not enough data
8.6
25
9.3
5
9.2
26
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Canonical LXC and Red Hat OpenShift are categorized as Container Management
Unique Categories
Canonical LXC has no unique categories
Red Hat OpenShift is categorized as Container Monitoring, Container Orchestration, Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Server Virtualization
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Canonical LXC
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Red Hat OpenShift
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
35.7%
Computer Software
28.6%
Management Consulting
7.1%
Internet
7.1%
Financial Services
7.1%
Other
14.3%
Information Technology and Services
15.5%
Financial Services
13.8%
Banking
9.2%
Computer Software
8.5%
Telecommunications
7.1%
Other
45.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is LXC virtualization?
1 Comment
NM
It's a Operating-system-level virtualization in which the kernel of an operating system allows the existence of multiple isolated user-space instances,...Read more
Canonical LXC has no more discussions with answers
What is included in Red Hat OpenShift container platform?
1 Comment
NG
you can deploy your applications and have UI which is more superior to Kubernetes. operator development, etc.. all features of k8s are present in OCP.Read more
Red Hat OpenShift has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
