Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare BrowserStack and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Star Rating
(2,479)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 user plan
Free Trial is available
Browse all 32 pricing plans
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Star Rating
(11)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that OpenText UFT Mobile excels in "Automated Regression Testing" with a score of 8.4, indicating a strong capability in ensuring that new code changes do not adversely affect existing functionalities. In contrast, BrowserStack, while still competent, has a lower score of 8.4 in this area, suggesting it may not be as robust in this specific functionality.
  • Reviewers mention that OpenText UFT Mobile's "Test Feedback" feature is highly rated at 9.2, providing users with valuable insights during the testing process. BrowserStack, however, has a slightly lower score of 8.6, which may indicate less comprehensive feedback mechanisms.
  • G2 users highlight that BrowserStack shines in "Real-Time Monitoring" with a score of 8.5, allowing for immediate insights during testing sessions. OpenText UFT Mobile, while effective, does not have a comparable feature that matches this level of real-time capability.
  • Users on G2 report that OpenText UFT Mobile's "Customizable Testing Tools" are rated at 8.9, allowing for tailored testing experiences. In comparison, BrowserStack's customization options are rated lower, which may limit flexibility for users needing specific testing configurations.
  • Reviewers mention that BrowserStack's "Test Variety" is rated at 8.7, showcasing its ability to handle diverse testing scenarios effectively. OpenText UFT Mobile, while still strong at 8.5, may not offer the same breadth of testing options as BrowserStack.
  • Users say that OpenText UFT Mobile's "Quality Assurance Dashboard" is rated at 8.5, providing a comprehensive overview of testing metrics. BrowserStack, while effective, does not have a similarly rated dashboard feature, which could impact users' ability to track testing progress efficiently.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
BrowserStack
Free Trial
$0.00
1 user plan
Browse all 32 pricing plans
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
No pricing available
Free Trial
BrowserStack
Free Trial is available
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
2,209
8.7
9
Ease of Use
8.9
2,269
9.1
9
Ease of Setup
8.9
1,274
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.7
545
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.7
1,883
8.1
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
512
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.3
2,222
8.5
8
Features by Category
8.0
119
Not enough data
Functionality
7.7
115
Not enough data
7.7
112
Not enough data
8.4
114
Not enough data
Reporting
8.0
111
Not enough data
8.5
281
Not enough data
Functionality
8.5
272
Not enough data
8.4
267
Not enough data
8.7
265
Not enough data
Management
8.4
270
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
266
Not enough data
8.6
1,156
8.8
7
Functionality
8.6
1088
9.2
6
8.7
1075
8.3
7
8.8
1084
8.1
6
Management
8.4
1070
7.9
7
8.3
1033
9.4
6
8.4
1049
9.7
6
Digital Accessibility PlatformsHide 18 FeaturesShow 18 Features
8.0
136
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.2
132
Not enough data
8.3
128
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Reporting
8.3
126
Not enough data
8.4
127
Not enough data
Automation
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.0
124
Not enough data
Functionality
8.1
128
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
128
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Accessibility Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Digital Accessibility ToolsHide 12 FeaturesShow 12 Features
8.1
131
Not enough data
Support
8.4
120
Not enough data
8.2
120
Not enough data
Reporting
8.4
120
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Functionality
8.4
124
Not enough data
8.3
125
Not enough data
8.2
119
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Accessibility Tools
8.0
14
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.1
14
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.2
906
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
866
Not enough data
8.6
859
Not enough data
8.2
844
Not enough data
8.5
849
Not enough data
Automation
8.4
833
Not enough data
8.5
844
Not enough data
8.5
838
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
7.6
45
Not enough data
7.4
46
Not enough data
7.5
45
Not enough data
7.5
135
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
7.6
129
Not enough data
7.5
128
Not enough data
7.4
128
Not enough data
AI Software Testing ToolsHide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
7.6
22
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
7.6
20
Not enough data
7.5
20
Not enough data
7.8
20
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
7.3
20
Not enough data
7.5
20
Not enough data
7.6
20
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
7.9
21
Not enough data
7.4
21
Not enough data
7.5
21
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
BrowserStack and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web are categorized as Mobile App Testing and Software Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is categorized as Other Development
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
43.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
37.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
19.0%
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
18.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
45.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
36.4%
Reviewers' Industry
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Computer Software
22.8%
Information Technology and Services
20.3%
Financial Services
5.5%
Marketing and Advertising
4.0%
Retail
2.7%
Other
44.7%
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
Computer Software
54.5%
Investment Banking
9.1%
Insurance
9.1%
Hospital & Health Care
9.1%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
9.1%
Other
9.1%
Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack Alternatives
Pcloudy
Pcloudy
Add Pcloudy
Qase
Qase
Add Qase
Perfecto
Perfecto
Add Perfecto
Katalon Platform
Katalon Platform
Add Katalon Platform
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Alternatives
Postman
Postman
Add Postman
Salesforce Platform
Salesforce Platform
Add Salesforce Platform
Okta
Okta
Add Okta
Xcode
Xcode
Add Xcode
Discussions
BrowserStack
BrowserStack Discussions
What are the benefits of automating a test case?
7 Comments
dnyaneshwar d.
DD
It helps to reduce the manual testing efforts which ultimately reduces the testing resource and budget.Read more
What can BrowserStack do?
4 Comments
Tony N.
TN
BrowserStack is a cloud-based web and mobile testing platform that enables users to test their websites and apps on real browsers and mobile devices. It...Read more
Which of the following features are supported by BrowserStack automate ?*?
4 Comments
dnyaneshwar d.
DD
Web/App Automate Read more
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web has no discussions with answers