Users report that Bluefish excels in coding features, particularly with its robust syntax highlighting (9.0) and find and replace functionality (9.1), making it a favorite among developers who prioritize code clarity and efficiency.
Reviewers mention that Pinegrow Web Editor shines with its WYSIWYG editor integration, allowing for a more visual approach to web design, which is particularly beneficial for users who prefer a less code-intensive experience.
G2 users highlight that Bluefish offers superior collaborative editing capabilities (8.3), making it easier for teams to work together on projects, while Pinegrow's collaborative features are less emphasized in user feedback.
Users on G2 report that Pinegrow Web Editor has a more extensive templates library, which is a significant advantage for users looking to quickly prototype or build websites without starting from scratch.
Reviewers mention that Bluefish's cross-platform support (9.3) is a strong point, allowing users to work seamlessly across different operating systems, while Pinegrow's support is noted to be more limited in comparison.
Users say that while both products have good extensibility (Bluefish at 8.9 and Pinegrow at 8.7), Bluefish is often preferred for its ability to integrate with a wider range of plugins, enhancing its functionality for advanced users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Bluefish
No pricing available
Pinegrow Web Editor
No pricing available
Free Trial
Bluefish
No trial information available
Pinegrow Web Editor
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
42
8.6
30
Ease of Use
8.5
42
8.3
30
Ease of Setup
8.3
9
8.5
8
Ease of Admin
7.8
6
8.1
7
Quality of Support
8.2
42
7.6
25
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.